Jim D.

Hillary and Trump

Recommended Posts

Anyone had a chance to see any of this ?

 

I havent seen where they downloaded what they were claiming they would. I did read the FBI anonymous users thread that was posted earlier by  joeblast and it was eerie how much he said has come to pass.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

looks like the basis for the child sex ring/trafficking is outlined here, with it's links to Hillary

 

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794247777756860417

 

commentary on earlier fbi anon leaks, from the donald:

 

FBI ANON was right again

http://pastebin.com/hgW5q5Kx 1.

"
The people under the magnifying glass do have an affinity for children.
"

2.

" Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primary in British parliament and Saudia Arabia, that's why Hillary and Bill love foreign donors so much.
They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.
"

3.

"I said that in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what,
and no one has yet asked about all the human trafficking bits I have been laying out."

Edited by wilfred
  • Like 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

looks like the basis for the child sex ring/trafficking is outlined here, with it's links to Hillary

 

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794247777756860417

 

commentary on earlier fbi anon leaks, from the donald:

 

FBI ANON was right again

http://pastebin.com/hgW5q5Kx 1.

2.

"The people under the magnifying glass do have an affinity for children."

3.

" Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primary in British parliament and Saudia Arabia, that's why Hillary and Bill love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you."

 

"I said that in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about all the human trafficking bits I have been laying out."

 

 

edit..if this has any basis in reality it has to be over for her to say the least. why is this not being reported anywhere??/???

Edited by bax44

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, here we have a person who defends the size of his hands, and the size/functionality of his penis, during a presidential debate.  Who is up during all hours having twitter fights on topics, and using the language, of an immature grade school bully... maybe 4th or 5th grade level, and an especially immature bullyish ass-holish 4th grader at that ... and that language & topic level is pretty much gone by the time we reach middle school, say a 12 or 13 year olds ... and was never there in the first place with more quality children... and yet he's a fully grown adult, and you're pointing to him and saying, "Yeah, that guy should be president of the most powerful nation in the world".

 

trump-reality-tv-freak.jpg

 

Again, I just find it bizarre that this is a conversation at all.

 

And, again, I recommend the book "The Wizard of Oz and Other Narcissists" to get an in-depth clinical study on Dump's personality disorder and that is worth actual detailed study.  But, imo, that he has a profound disorder of some sort ... couldn't be more blatant.

 

(And, disclaimer, I'm using "you" in the paragraph above as the general broad "you", not pointing to anyone specifically.)

Edited by Trunk
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so these people are having 'pizza' parties pretty often. seem to really love their pizzas. this is some sick stuff...

 

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/5azc9k/someone_tell_me_im_wrong_this_invite_to_a_pizza/

 

http://magafeed.com/wikileaks-emails-uncover-john-podestas-sick-twisted-spirit-dinners/

 

Edited by wilfred
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, here we have a person who defends the size of his hands, and the size/functionality of his penis, during a presidential debate. Who is up during all hours having twitter fights on topics, and using the language, of an immature grade school bully... maybe 4th or 5th grade level, and an especially immature bullyish ass-holish 4th grader at that ... and that language & topic level is pretty much gone by the time we reach middle school, say a 12 or 13 year olds ... and was never there in the first place with more quality children... and yet he's a fully grown adult, and you're pointing to him and saying, "Yeah, that guy should be president of the most powerful nation in the world".

 

trump-reality-tv-freak.jpg

 

Again, I just find it bizarre that this is a conversation at all.

 

And, again, I recommend the book "The Wizard of Oz and Other Narcissists" to get an in-depth clinical study on Dump's personality disorder and that is worth actual detailed study. But, imo, that he has a profound disorder of some sort ... couldn't be more blatant.

 

(And, disclaimer, I'm using "you" in the paragraph above as the general broad "you", not pointing to anyone specifically.)

Many people are 'holding their noses' when they vote for Trump. At least he isn't trying to turn the world into a cinder block, selling the USA to every dictator on the planet to line her own pocket, removing the last vestiges of US freedom of rights, allegedly involved in a paedophillia ring and child trafficking.

 

I don't know how anyone can vote for Clinton. If she doesn't stand down this year she will likely go to prison. She is pushing the world towards a serious confrontation and every decision she has made has been disasterous. No one can point to a single thing of good that she has done. She is reckless, lacks judgement -look at the use of that secret server-and has ridden on Bills coat tails as a result of being the 'suffering' woman. She has threatened Bills accusers. She has got her criminal friends off the hook when they should have gone to prison.

 

How can anyone with any morals vote for that ? If I was democrat, then I wouldn't vote at all, or I woukd give the vote to an independent such as Stein.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clinton news network.

 

Sudden panic because Trump is winning. Now that the FBI have officially found no connection between Trump, Putin or Russia, the Clinton engine is suddenly seeing their election floundering and are crying 'rigging' - whilst less than 3 weeks ago they were laughing at Trump for saying there was rigging.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clinton news network.

 

Sudden panic because Trump is winning. Now that the FBI have officially found no connection between Trump, Putin or Russia, the Clinton engine is suddenly seeing their election floundering and are crying 'rigging' - whilst less than 3 weeks ago they were laughing at Trump for saying there was rigging.

Clinton New Network?

 

Let me understand I am confused. Anything that goes against Trump is Clinton backers manipulating the system and the only reliable sources are those that bash Clinton and support Trump?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you just have to watch the reporting. What they cover and what they don't report.

 

Lots of bad information about Clinton right now and watch how they cover for her, defend it.

 

Notice how every panel discussion is slanted liberal.

 

If you wanna know about Trump watch CNN. If you wanna know about Clinton watch Fox.

 

.

Edited by Jonesboy
  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clinton New Network?Let me understand I am confused. Anything that goes against Trump is Clinton backers manipulating the system and the only reliable sources are those that bash Clinton and support Trump?

Make your own mind up about it. Trump is not supported by any network other than Fox. As I'm sure you have read, there is a sliding door between CNN and the Clinton campaign, namely one Donna Brazille who has subsequently been sacked for giving Clinton questions in advance. Several of the emails point to collusion between the Clinton campaign and CNN as well as all the other MSM.

 

I've already said there is a coup taking place in the USA as well as other countries including Britain. I don't know where Trump himself stands, he has been involved in the Clinton network through campaign contributions and he may have been involved further -hence the story of him raping a 13 year old.

 

This is no longer an election in the normal sense of the word. Anything you thought you knew has changed. It is likely there is misinformation and psy-ops being utilised by both sides. There is sufficient evidence to suggest that the Clinton Foundation and those connected to it are the most criminal people on the planet earth. The situation in Haiti and the pay to play contributions is enough to convince me that this is serious corruption and probably something far, far worse.

 

Don't be taken in by the attempts to re-erect Cold War Mcarthyism from the grave. Communism has long gone from Russia, they are just a large country with a pretty small economy and some nasty weapons. Their preference would be to trade with the USA whoever the POTUS is.

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Clinton New Network?

 

Let me understand I am confused. Anything that goes against Trump is Clinton backers manipulating the system and the only reliable sources are those that bash Clinton and support Trump?

Ummm...

 

You do know that CNN was recently revealed to have been actively colluding with the Clinton campaign, right?

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, here we have a person who defends the size of his hands, and the size/functionality of his penis, during a presidential debate.  Who is up during all hours having twitter fights on topics, and using the language, of an immature grade school bully... maybe 4th or 5th grade level, and an especially immature bullyish ass-holish 4th grader at that ... and that language & topic level is pretty much gone by the time we reach middle school, say a 12 or 13 year olds ... and was never there in the first place with more quality children... and yet he's a fully grown adult, and you're pointing to him and saying, "Yeah, that guy should be president of the most powerful nation in the world".

 

 

 

Again, I just find it bizarre that this is a conversation at all.

 

And, again, I recommend the book "The Wizard of Oz and Other Narcissists" to get an in-depth clinical study on Dump's personality disorder and that is worth actual detailed study.  But, imo, that he has a profound disorder of some sort ... couldn't be more blatant.

 

(And, disclaimer, I'm using "you" in the paragraph above as the general broad "you", not pointing to anyone specifically.)

pointing at him and saying "but he's a teenager in his mind" might have carried some weight in pretty much any other election, when the opponent isnt a lifelong criminal, and has evidence leaking like the hole in the titanic.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No you just have to watch the reporting. What they cover and what they don't report.

 

Lots of bad information about Clinton right now and watch how they cover for her, defend it.

 

Notice how every panel discussion is slanted liberal.

 

If you wanna know about Trump watch CNN. If you wanna know about Clinton watch Fox.

 

.

I do not see anything slanted liberal at all. I see authoritarianism around every corner?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not see anything slanted liberal at all. I see authoritarianism around every corner?

That's quite an extraordinary comment, my friend. Quite revealing, in fact, and I thought I'd quote it for posterity. ;)
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That's quite an extraordinary comment, my friend. Quite revealing, in fact, and I thought I'd quote it for posterity. ;)

Our country reeks of authoritarianism. Not liberalism. I would consider Bernie Sanders liberal. Clinton is a right wing authoritarian war hawk.

 

War hawks are not liberals it automatically disqualifies you. It is like the term married bachelor. It is an impossible contradiction.

 

Obama is not a liberal. Almost all the politicians in the US are right wing authoritarians.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Confusing these labels. Easier to state if someone is for more statism or more freedom.

 

Bernie was an old 70s style socialist with big Government planning, Clinton is part of a massive crime syndicate which seeks to use the state to fill the pockets of its members.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites