-
Content count
7,350 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
56
About dwai
- Currently Viewing Forums Index
-
Rank
Tadekam evadvitiyam
Recent Profile Visitors
19,481 profile views
-
Inhale:retention:exhale:retention ratio is important too. What is it that OP follows?
-
oh I wasnât referring to myself. My teacher on the other handâŚentirely another level. I know many of them. The good ones are never raucously vocal like many there are like I said, language. Transfer of force through the fascia is also not the entire story. Not magical at all â only phenomena that need a higher degree of sensitivity to get.
-
I didnât find the video objectionable at all. I do know experientially what this chi stuff is, so I am not a skeptic. I was a long time ago, but not now. I think many practitioners complain about this stuff because theyâve spent a lot of time and effort and not been able to enter âthe gateâ beyond the physical level. So they think all there is, is the physical level. My experience with my teachers is that the secret is not a secret at all. We make it more complex than it needs to be, in our obsession with science. Iâve heard pretty famous western teachers say, âitâs all physicsâ and then in the same breath say, âput your mind on the opponentâs root and displace themâ. If it is all physics, what role does the mind play there beyond being an observer? When someone experiences the âadhereâ jin, it is nothing short of magical, until the principles are shown. There needs to be a fair degree of sensitivity in a practitioner to be able to feel the field.
-
Then you should revisit what you do, along the lines of what @Trunk pointed out. Breath retention should be done in a sequential manner, after learning how to control the epiglottis to regulate speed of inhale and exhale, etc.
-
I think it is unwise to dismiss something purely because of personal biases or knowledge limitations. Set aside chi for a moment; thereâs more to fascial web connection and manipulation than biomechanics can explain. There is the role of the mind as well, in terms of the effect when it is focused on or away from a particular point during a hand-trapping type of interaction (which is what push hands is).
-
People see âmotiveâ, I see language. Also, all respect to Rob Poynton, I donât see in him what I see in more advanced practitioners. Systema seems like Russian tai chi really, with some ground grappling thrown into the mix. What is âwooâ? Anything people canât understand and looks supernatural.
-
Do you mean you get knocked out or you are in a state of absorption?
-
The long Om is not a mantra practice in itself - there is much more going on under the surface. It is the method provided in the Mandukya Upanishad and with the associated instruction and understanding, it will help in realization.
-
Iâm not referring to Sri Aurobindoâs light body. I was referring to all our friends here who want to develop a light body.
-
If that works for you, more power to you. Let us exchange notes after you succeed in your practice. No use for me. For others there might be. For those bums who are interested, let us chat after their light body is perfected.
-
I realize this line of discourse is distressful for many here. FWIW, For all the friends who have been hurt by nondual assertions, please donât take what some of us saying as a criticism or rejection of your personal practices. Please continue to do what works for you. But at least give what is being pointed to a serious thinking through. If @Bindi wants to develop her central channel, it will become easier with nondual recognition. All practices will become more natural, and progress towards becoming effortless. If someone wants to develop a light body, itâll help them too. So it is for all other spiritual practices. No one is diminishing the suffering caused by/faced by humanity. And I am certain all good people do the best they can to help (whether they are dualists or nondualists).
-
Things and nondual? đ¤ đ¤Śđžââď¸
-
In duality all we have are questions, not many convincing answers. In nonduality there are only answers, but no questions at all.
-
I did answer it in response to Apech's cross-eyed post
-
It wasn't a trick question. Does anyone need proof other than the act of seeing? Similarly with consciousness. Only thing is, it is mixed up with the mind and experiences for most of us. The acts of thinking, hearing, seeing, tasting, smelling, and feeling (subtle body falls under this category) are all that are needed to recognize consciousness.