寒月 Hanyue

The Dao Bums
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won



About 寒月 Hanyue

  • Rank
    Dao Bum

Recent Profile Visitors

15,561 profile views
  1. sitting practice

    I agree with Apech. Most debating this, appear to forget or overlook context. Teachers advising X is preferred over Y are doing so based on the context of a given cultivation method. If you are not practicing that method, then their advise about the use of posture becomes either less or entirely irrelevant. The main thing when learnign a tradition or specific method from a teacher, is follow their advice and trust that it suits and supports the practice of THAT method. There will always be others doing other things while practicing other methods. Criticism of sitting in a chair, is like a football (soccer) player complaining a basketball player used his hands. That said, there are a variety of reasons to learn to sit in full lotus, as well as a variety of approaches of doing so. Some advise it because of the physical stability the posture brings from a culture that sat on the floor. This physical stability enables a deeper practice developing stability of mind and other states. Some advise it as a method to shut off the leg channels, this enables an easier and quicker concentration of energy at the base of the torso, as well as building energetic pressure to stimulate energy centers and channels. Some say that in "proper" full lotus the leg channels are not shut off and the channels are fully open and flowing. This last view, does not in fact undermine the use of the posture to shut off the channels. They are simply different usages, of the same posture at different stages by different levels of practitioner. Things are not so black and white; posture X = 'one thing only' I've had teachers advocate it, or working towards it. While others have felt it was a "show off" posture for the flexible. It is certanly true that the vast majority of those I have met that can comfortably adopt the full lotus posture have no eneregtic or spiritual development whatsoever. Best,
  2. Liu He Ba Fa

    Thanks for sharing That was great! Lovely to watch, such clear shenfa.
  3. This is correct. It has Bruce's name on it as a stamp of approval, but it is Paul's book, following Pauls way of explaining things. All the senior students have their own ways of leading people through the neigong, as does Bruce. I like the original H&E Dvd as well. Though there are some issues with it. In the same way that Bruce goes into the advanced version rather than the usual foundational version of cloud hands on the Energy Gates Dvd. In the H&E Dvd he doesn't explain/teach the initial circulation for the large cycle, he goes straight into a more advanced version. I still think it gives a great introduction, and overview for layers of the practice that many will get a lot from. All in a relatively inexpensive package. Best,
  4. Not all Daoist lines place or associate the zhongdantian (central/middle dantian) with the heart, or the heart as being a dantian. Some do, some don't. This can annoy people that want everything to line up and fit neat boxes, but there you go. And no it doesn't mean one tradition is "correct" and others "false", and which is which.... Over the years I've been exposed to several dantian models, all of which follow the internal logic of the tradition that used them. Similar to 'chakra' models (of which there are plenty) used in different yogic and Buddhist traditions.
  5. That is because it was set up to organise hosting workshops 8 years ago! There are no plans for us to host Michael in Europe. If you wish to know whether or not he has any intention to travel to Europe, e-mail him and ask directly, his e-mail is on his website http://www.qigongamerica.com/ You could even look into organising and hosting him yourself.
  6. Does music deplete qi/jing?

    You're welcome. No. Wouldn't that be a miserable life! While it is common to translate 慾 as "desire" and if you look in a modern dictionary it will also say "passion", this can lead to some interesting interpretations of what Laozi is trying to point out. That you must live a "passionless" life? Not only is this counter to the received pragmatic teachings, but also if we turn our hats to a scholastic view. 慾 etymologically carries the meaning of 'to want, to request, to ask, expectation, longing' the meaning of which is usually summed up as I mentioned, in the translation of "desire". One way that makes pragmatic sense of this, is the view that Laozi was pointing out that when we want things to be something they are not, this leads us away from the Dao and into mental or emotional states that separate us from it (be they viewed or experienced as "positive" or "negative" states). You can however fully accept what is, and experience positive emotional states. Denial of emotional states is in fact counter to the teaching of accepting things as they are and naturally arise. That, or you can choose a dour life. Yes it is true that many renunciates aim to reduce the impact of the world upon themselves to aid their training. Hence the term renunciate. But that is only way approach to get somewhere, and even that does not always lead people to where they are trying to get to. So don't mistake the approach for the destination. Laozi explains an approach in a kind of tongue twisting, brain frying play on words in verse 71 (though different editions of the text read slightly differently); Know not-knowing: supreme. Not know knowing: faulty Only faulting faults is faultless. The Sage is faultless By faulting faults, And so is without fault. - Addiss & Lombardo If you can wrap your head around that, you'll see that avoiding things is irrelevant. It was and is only ever a temporary stop-gap, which may or may not be helpful for any given individual. Don't forget the Chinese saying "The small hermit lives on a mountain, the great hermit lives in town."
  7. Daoist Winter practices

    There are two paths that you can get an answer from. One is irrelevant for most people. The other can be understood in several ways. For some it will lead to an esoteric study usually involving tables of correspondences and associations, as well as practices or methods that engage those correspondences and associations in order to align with the qualities viewed as relevant to winter (or the given season). Without knocking the above, as I mentioned it is not the only understanding. Another is more directly connected to the natural realm. This is about following the qi of the seasons, it's not the weather, that is only one part. The qi of the season has a terrestrial and celestial aspect, but as I've said it isn't about going into complicated calculations and potentially dogmatic tables of correspondences. Instead it is rooted in observation of nature, flora and fauna. Winter is often touted as relating to our kidney system, which is true but easily misunderstood. It isn't really talking about the kidney organs, although they are an aspect of it. The Neijing provides suggestions that are based on not taxing the kidney system, physically, or mentally-emotionally. So, whatever you have in your life that uses the kidney system, you want to learn to back off from that (plausible), or even completely stop it (not so easy in todays society). The actual practices therefore should be the ones that emphasis or allow that, or that aspect of your practice becomes emphasised (not entirely the same thing). While nature is going deeply yin heading into the peak of winter, it does not mean there is no yang. Reducing activity does not always mean no activity, or even less activity, it refers more to how you approach and do activity. You still want to encourage some circulation to maintain health and fend off the cold. The cold is viewed as driving things deep into the body, which is why the surface and extremities can become cold. We are advised that we want our qi to go deeply inwards, to store and nourish during winter. So why not let the cold do this for us? They are not the same. In our practice we want to maintain some yang, this enables and allows the yin aspect of our practice to be better, deeper or more full. Losing the yang can lead to what is called 死坐 "dead sitting", a concept found in Daoism and Chan Buddhism. Another aspect is changing with the yin-yang changes of light (daytime) and dark (nighttime), maximising the time we have available light, and getting suitable rest. Another would be eating sensibly in accordance with seasonally available foods, as well as cutting back on yin foods (cold/cooling food etc), while emphasising yang foods (hot/warming foods etc), this includes what we drink and any teas we consume (which change seasonally). So our food, practice, habits and activities fall in line with the nature and qi of winter, more than they do not. The caveat is that each person is unique, and given possible present pathologies what is best for an indiviual is always a balance between medical and seasonal considerations. Just because you read somewhere "do X in ______ season", it does not mean it is appropriate for you. Learn to know yourself... and find those that can help you do so in the meantime.
  8. Does music deplete qi/jing?

    Apologies but this feels like a mis-understanding of Laozi. 五色使人目盲 the five colours make our eyes blind 五音使人耳聾 the five tones make our ears deaf 五味使人口爽 the five flavours make our mouths numb To beleive that there is only one singular 'true' meaning in these classics is a mistake. Bearing that in mind. Here the number five is being used to represent the manifesation in the world around us, it could read "all colour(s), all sound(s), all flavour(s)...". It is not saying "music uses the five tones, the five tones make us deaf, therefore do not listen to music". Just as it does not mean "blind", "deaf", "numb" in the literal sense of physically being incapable of seeing, hearing etc. It means that we are blind to the Dao, deaf to the Dao etc. Even if you avoid music, you are still hearing the "five tones" Laozi is referring to. Rather it is pointing to what occurs when we lose ourselves in the manifestation of the world. Buddhists would call that maya (illusion). Laozi remember is trying to point you to the Dao, which is 'constant', rather than the world of form, which is always changing. If you are not blind to the Dao, deaf to the deaf, numb to the Dao, you can watch, or listen or eat and it will not make you "blind", "deaf", "numb". These passages are not in isolation; 視之不見, we look but don't see it 名曰夷; and call it indistinct 聽之不聞, we listen but don't hear it 名曰希; and call it faint 搏之不得, we reach but don't grasp it 名曰微。 and call it ethereal Which is a continuation of the previous ideas. This is not philosophy or life advice, it is a direct pragmatic experience of consciousness.
  9. Spider Kung Fu

    I remember this thread haha Doc's logic and reasoning is not always straight forward, there are often intentional puzzles, and mis-direction. He liked to keep people on their toes, as well as see who was truly paying attention and doing their homework. Just to be clear, many of the basic/foundational kamae in Bujinkan taijutsu can be found in all sorts of arts or activities the world over. It doesn't mean they are related! Unless of course hiraichimonji really is the secret kamae of football goal keepers around the globe!? While there are some very rare and bizarre gongfu styles, if you think a little more laterally, you might get more traction understanding where Doc was coming from (even if it wasn't specifically), you still might learn more than banging your head against the wall, and turn up something worthwhile and of interest, which is what he wanted anyway.
  10. Potent Systems

    And people want to skip beginners content and go straight to the super advanced stages?? The "beginner" stage of any mehtod is always the more important and relevant. I said.. Personally I feel training in person with a teacher of a method is always far better than trying to learn from resources alone. If you have access to a teacher resources can help with the learning process, even if they are not exactly the same in content. I don't know many who would listen to a book over an actual teacher, but well.. Lastly, there are various resources purporting to teach this method, there are differences between them, and some are far more reliable than others. Several are also ridiculously expensive, especially for what you get. So regardless of anything else, I still feel that book is the most accessible (cost and readability) point of entry into the method for anyone without a teacher. It is not a bad book, in a sea of crappy qigong books. If someone enjoys and likes the method, then they can investigate further, either in finding a teacher or forking out more money for an expensive course to (hopefully) take them further. It isn't rocket science, it's common sense.
  11. Potent Systems

    Chia's "Healing Buddha Palms Chi Kung" is his marketting name for Shaolin Neijin Yizhichan Qigong (full name). A good and accessible book is; https://www.amazon.com/Shaolin-Nei-Jin-Qi-Gong/dp/0877288763/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1480677706&sr=8-1&keywords=shaolin+nei+qigong Some of this method is blended with other methods in the 'Healing Qigong' section of Qigong Empowerment. Beware some of the expensive "courses" being sold on the web for this method. Best,
  12. Mate, you crack me up, nearly split my tea!
  13. Hi Pan, In YSB there is standing to develop 'blood', and standing to develop 'qi' for a reason. You want to understand and work with both. There is a VERY good reason for both methods, and even modern sports science supports this. Please know that there is always a reason for a given practice. If one teacher says "do this...like this....avoid XYZ when doing so" it is beacuse that is the practice they are teaching you, and how to get the development they are trying to get you to have. It is that simple. It does NOT mean that another teacher, teaching another method cannot say the exact opposite! "do this...like this....and embrace XYZ when doing so". It can be a different method to develop something else, even if it LOOKS the same to the outside eye. In plain straight out physical exertion shaking means you have overly taxed the muscles and confused the neuro-muscular connection. When trying to learn movement patterns etc, this is not good. It gets in the way of that purpose. Yes, out in the wider world, there are methods that intentionally sets up this kind of shaking, but their reasons for doing so, and the proposed aims of those methods are not tied to training movement patterns. You want a smooth neuro-muscular connection. In Chinese medicine shaking and vibration means the qi and blood are in a dissonant relationship, they aren't together so to speak. Either the qi is moving too fast for the blood, or the blood is not able to keep up with the qi (not the same thing). YSB has doudong gong (shaking) practices in it's daoyin, shaking is not always bad. It depends on why it is being done, when it is being done and how it is being done. Be careful of comparing apples and oranges. I hope this helps,
  14. ShaktiMama

    I want to clarify that Doc Morris was not Susan's predecessor. Doc sought her out to learn from her, they became friends and colleagues and worked together for years, she changed the way he did things and taught. That said, most people only know of her because of Docs work. Every individual is the sum of all of the influences upon their life and their life experiences. The idea that cultivation 'fixes' everything is such a myth. And "kundalini-shakti" was only one aspect of Susan's path, which cannot be reduced down to such a simplistic label. Susan was an amazing and wonderful friend and mentor, who I've known for 13 years. I've had the pleasure of hosting her in Europe a few times, hanging out with her was always a great time, a fantastic sense of humour and a genuine and lovely human being. Through her I met many other dear friends. She changed my life, I will miss her deeply. May Light shine on your eternal soul, much love.
  15. Six Healing Sonds and exzessive Yawning

    Yes! Farting is good! When doing treatment farting is a good sign, as with others. Though many people will repress it because of embarrssment! I teach yawning as a way into understanding the old methods. There is a reason it is said they are based in nature, it is sad that this appears to have largely been forgotten. People have retained the words, and yet, things are not rooted in nature anymore.