ChiDragon

Chapter One of the TTC

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Cobie said:

 

 

The characters here are:

 

 

Twice the translator had to chose a meaning for 道 . The listing for 道 in Kroll:


~~~<>~~~
dao4

~~~<>~~~

1. way that leads somewhere, road,

route, pathway, passage.

2. the Way; as image suggesting how things actually exist, fundamental reality, 
a constant Way in which the diverse ways of living and relating are essentially balanced and whole.

a. conceptual term used by all schools of thought, 

with same root metaphor but varying connotations:

Confucian 
‘Way’ incl. norms of social responsibility and personal conduct

exemplified by ideal worthies such as King Wen of the Zhou, the Duke of Zhou, etc.;

Dao. 
‘Way’ points to absolute and ineffable reality

behind flux and modalities of the world, and advisability of taking it as model; 

Budd. 
‘Way’ incl. possibility of release from the round-of-birth-and-death

(samsara) and recognition of contingent and impermanent nature of human existence.

b. 道士
dao4 shi4
gentleman of the Way,

exemplar of the Confucian ‘Way’;

 

also,

expert in the ‘Way’, specialist in occult or mantic practices, syn. 方士 fang4 shi4;

 

also (med.),

Daoist adept, usu. associated with an organised Dao. community (see 5a below), priest.

 

N.B.

Contrast these with (med) 道人 dao4 ren2, man of religion, a Budd. monk (not Dao.).

3. way of doing something,
course of action, method, proper procedure, practice;

 

e.g. 

 

所以 求 之 之 道

suo3 yi3 qiu2 zhi1 zhi0 dao4,

the means by which one seeks it;

 

道場

dao4 chang2,

place of practice, arena of the Way, altar, Budd. or Dao. chapel.

 

a. guiding road, rule of conduct, 

principle, guidelines.

b. doctrine,

tenets, dicta; teachings.

c. (Budd.) the Buddha-path,

path to enlightenment.

4. skill or art of a particular kind,

specialisation.

5. ideas and teachings 
esp. associated with the texts Zhuangzi and Laozi (or Daodejing); 


e.g.

 

道家

dao4 jia1,

lineage of the Way, 
bibliographic category ref. to these and related texts, often defined as ‘philosophical Daoism’ in contrast to next.

a. practices

esp. associated with movements and texts relating to masters of self-cultivation, pursuit of immortality,


and various organised religious communities,

esp. those ultimately deriving from the Way of the Celestial Masters

(tiashidao 天 師 道 [tian1 shi1 dao4]) founded in mid-2nd-c. CE;

 

e.g.

 

(med.) 

道教

dao4 jiao4,

teaching of the Way,

from early 5th-c. CE a term assoc. with groups and texts just described,

often defined now as ‘religious Daoism’.

 

6. say, speak; 

express, communicate orally; cue.

 

7. circuit, administrative area

outside the usu. prefecture/district (junxian 郡縣 [jun4 xian4 prefecture county]) structure;

in Han times ref. frontier areas mainly populated by non-Chinese;

in Tang times also ref. frontier area

but from 706 on more importantly to large units of province size throughput the state,

each of which (10 at first) incl. many prefectures and governed by special commissioners (shi 使 [shi3 sent]).

 

8. (med.) understand,

be aware of; think, presume. 
 

a. (med.) expect; 

have a sense that X is likely to happen. 
 

~~~<>~~~
dao3

~~~<>~~~

 

1. (interchangeable) 導 dao3

 

1. lead, lead the way, 

show the way; conduct, guide.  
 

~~~
 

Even after filtering out (e.g. ‘med.’, ‘Budd.’), I will still be left with a plethora of choices.

 

 

 

Is it often that the same character is used twice in a line having different meanings? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, steve said:

 

Is it often that the same character is used twice in a line having different meanings? 


Oh, yes. Especially in classic. For example:

Chapter 71 
1. 知不知,
2. 尚矣;
3. 不知知,
4. 病也。
5. 聖人不病,
6. 以其病病。
7. 夫唯病病,
8. 是以不病。 


1. One who knows what he doesn't know.
2. Is the best.
3. One who doesn't know but thinks he knows.
4. It's a sickness.
5. A wise man has no sickness.
6. He treated sickness as a sickness.
7. Because he knows his sickness as a sickness.
8. Hence, he has no sickness.

Edited by ChiDragon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@steve I think so, yes. And keeping to the same meaning imo makes the verse meaningless. 
 

 

 

Edited by Cobie

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

to grok its quale

 

Most of this topic is beyond me. But as a lifelong, native English speaker, I feel confident in asserting that almost no native English speaker would choose this phrasing, least of all if the intent is to be clear as possible. “Grok” and “quale” are abstract, philosophical jargon.

 

A clearer phrasing might be: “to intimately understand the inner experience.”

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, 心神 ~ said:

A clearer phrasing might be: “to intimately understand the inner experience.”


I would like to hear from you. How you rephrase these two lines and include Tao in your thought?

 

5. Hence, when Tao is always invisible, one would grok its quale.
6. When Tao is always visible, one would observe its boundary.

Edited by ChiDragon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, ChiDragon said:


Oh, yes. Especially in classic. For example:

Chapter 71 
1. 知不知,
2. 尚矣;
3. 不知知,
4. 病也。
5. 聖人不病,
6. 以其病病。
7. 夫唯病病,
8. 是以不病。 


1. One who knows what he doesn't know.
2. Is the best.
3. One who doesn't know but thinks he knows.
4. It's a sickness.
5. A wise man has no sickness.
6. He treated sickness as a sickness.
7. Because he knows his sickness as a sickness.
8. Hence, he has no sickness.

 

In these examples the character translates the same in each case.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, 心神 ~ said:

“Grok” and “quale” are abstract, philosophical jargon.

 

Don't you think that the TTC is what it is?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, steve said:

 

In these examples the character translates the same in each case.


Thank you for your attention. Let's me try another example.

Edited by ChiDragon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, steve said:

In these examples the character translates the same in each case.

3. 無,名天地之始。
4. 有,名萬物之母。
5. 故常無,欲以觀其妙。
6. 常有,欲以觀其徼。

 

3. Invisible, was a name given to Tao at the origin of sky and earth.
4. Visible, was a name given to Tao as the mother of all things.

5. Hence, when Tao is always invisible, one would grok its quale.
6. When Tao is always visible, one would observe its boundary.

Actually, line 3 and 4, '有' and '無' was treated as a noun. Most Chinese characters have a sound and meaning.  Laotze was killing two birds with one stone. The these two characters was used to name Tao. It also with an implication of what state that Tao was in.

Lines 5 and 6 '有' and '無' as adjectives.  
常無: always not there, it didn't imply it doesn't exist. 
常有: always there

Edited by ChiDragon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites