Stosh

Trump talk

Recommended Posts

It certainly explains why I couldn't find a map depicting the territorial delimitations of the Persian gulf vs international waters, and why I cannot filter the utub vids in the way that I want. ...

y'know,

If done properly ,the same algorithms, could be employed to diversify public opinion and bring tolerance n harmony. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, Stosh said:

If done properly ,the same algorithms, could be employed to diversify public opinion and bring tolerance n harmony. 

 

 

by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then  metastasize into something  else like  a cancer...

 

no thanks for me......

 

The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its  "social credit"

 

"China plans to rank all its citizens based on their "social credit" by 2020. People can be rewarded or punished according to their scores. Like private financial credit scores, a person's social scores can move up and down according to their behavior."

 

as an example of how it works

 

 

Now imagine all the "free stuff"  in the US being tied to this,,in a way they all ready are....

 

 

The left is using, developing this system now....

 

In taiwan,  you can take  a picture of bad driving ect and send it into the police station,,,they pay you money...

sounds good, until you find out there are people who make a living doing this...

 

think about face book, twitter  ect....people are already getting programed to interface with systems that will control them later....

 

Edited by windwalker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

off topic / The US is still very low tech compared to some other countries 

 

give it time,,,,In the US its moving towards this 

 

 

Edited by windwalker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, joeblast said:

So long as you get and trust your "news" from the very mouthpieces of propaganda, you'll NEVER be able to believe a correct story.

 

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

"by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then  metastasize into something  else like  a cancer...

 

no thanks for me......

 

The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its  "social credit" "

 

I totally understand the problem you mention , but consider this,  the tech firms are here to stay , Yes?

and a solution has to be found for the misuse of it , Yes? 

Personally I would rather see decentralization , but , if I can't have that, then they can still be a force for good if the execs realize that they are using evil methods , to try to assert a public good.  The left likes diversity , right ? so it should be an easy sell, to have them try to promote diversity by presenting not only the items one initially is looking for , but , the alternatives which balance things out. 

 

Instead of saying, You might like this , and force-feeding all sorts of items which reinforce the echo-chamber , they could expose people to new ideas that can compete on merit. Broaden markets through advertising . Join the world together. 

For instance , we generally do not see the news from Manilla , so You click on a news tab for the Philippines , google translate kicks in , and we can hear and participate in the daily news of those people, maybe get a feel for the market forces, see a good travel deal , hear what they have to say about their governance. 

 

You are wishing to dominate the product , of an industry which will continue to develop behind the scenes , no matter what you tell them to do. If you control the Tech giants  in USA to keep them under control, they will just shift to some other place and leave us at the disadvantage. Its the American way , to promote peace , merit , and unity ,,, by allowing free speech , competition , and diversity. 

Not to-   suppress speech , arbitrarily decide merit , and box out competing groups. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Stosh said:

the tech firms are here to stay , Yes?

 

No  wouldn't agree with this.

 

Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past....

It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there...

 

I give it 10 to 15 yrs before it reaches max tipping point

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, ralis said:

 

What you stated about me is made up of conspiratorial nonsense which does not deserve a response. If you read books instead of conspiracy sites, we might have a discussion. I challenge you to read Arendt's work!

I'd actually welcome debate with you, its just that every time we attempt it and all your fallacies and holes in your positions start getting pointed out, that's when you huff and puff and take your toy and go home and say we're not worth debating here. 

 

This ok with you, ralis?  This is yet another instance of people with your beliefs disregarding the law because they *believe* their official capacity allows them to completely disregard their job and issue rulings based not upon the law but upon how they think the world should be.

b70f29d88624772b8de901d6f7ded701ae80e7e7

Do you know why Trump replaced so many judges, and why the 9th Circuit no longer leans retarded? 

 

Because all the subversive Progressive elements are being cleaned out of the system.

 

And not only in the USA.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, C T said:

Trump sanctions dead guy Ayatollah Khomeini :rolleyes:

 

 

:rolleyes:    ya,,,looks like someone in his staff made a mistake  ya think.

 

Or do you believe that the president attends to all the details 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Stosh said:

 

 

"by who,,,what would be the difference between that and whats going on now....its the same...Like most things it starts our benign and then  metastasize into something  else like  a cancer...

 

no thanks for me......

 

The thing is the US companies like google helped china make its  "social credit" "

 

I totally understand the problem you mention , but consider this,  the tech firms are here to stay , Yes?

and a solution has to be found for the misuse of it , Yes? 

Personally I would rather see decentralization , but , if I can't have that, then they can still be a force for good if the execs realize that they are using evil methods , to try to assert a public good.  The left likes diversity , right ? so it should be an easy sell, to have them try to promote diversity by presenting not only the items one initially is looking for , but , the alternatives which balance things out. 

 

Instead of saying, You might like this , and force-feeding all sorts of items which reinforce the echo-chamber , they could expose people to new ideas that can compete on merit. Broaden markets through advertising . Join the world together. 

For instance , we generally do not see the news from Manilla , so You click on a news tab for the Philippines , google translate kicks in , and we can hear and participate in the daily news of those people, maybe get a feel for the market forces, see a good travel deal , hear what they have to say about their governance. 

 

You are wishing to dominate the product , of an industry which will continue to develop behind the scenes , no matter what you tell them to do. If you control the Tech giants  in USA to keep them under control, they will just shift to some other place and leave us at the disadvantage. Its the American way , to promote peace , merit , and unity ,,, by allowing free speech , competition , and diversity. 

Not to-   suppress speech , arbitrarily decide merit , and box out competing groups. 

 

"Big Tech" is "here to stay" but the things they are doing are not here to stay.  Companies are going to have to decide if they are a platform or a publisher and that's the crux of the matter.  I think SOME people are going to be massively surprised once "big tech" is no longer inflating their programmed-in viewpoint to front and center, just where the "general sentiment" of "the people" lies exactly.

 

 

 

23 minutes ago, C T said:

you realize this is all going after assets tied to the deep state clown network and their subsidiaries, right?  if not - there's the hole in your observation ;)  there's necessarily plenty of head faking going on - and if you're missing that AP, Reuters, CNN, Guardian, et al are the media wing of the clown network's corporate branch - welp, there's another gaping hole in the analysis.

 

how long did they work to obtain all that credibility, and look at how it burns so brightly now that its being expended in a great dumpster fire :lol:

Edited by joeblast
I'm not laughing AT you like ralis always assumes, btw. I'm just genuinely good natured and like to laugh and smile. ascii doesnt always convey that very well, heh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past....

It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there...

 

Yes ,it would be much harder than the telecoms , so how do you envision they would do it, what would they look like ? 

Edited by Stosh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, windwalker said:

 

:rolleyes:    ya,,,looks like someone in his staff made a mistake  ya think.

 

Or do you believe that the president attends to all the details 

 

 

He's just dumb maybe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, joeblast said:

"Big Tech" is "here to stay" but the things they are doing are not here to stay.  Companies are going to have to decide if they are a platform or a publisher and that's the crux of the matter.  I think SOME people are going to be massively surprised once "big tech" is no longer inflating their programmed-in viewpoint to front and center, just where the "general sentiment" of "the people" lies exactly.

 

 

 

you realize this is all going after assets tied to the deep state clown network and their subsidiaries, right?  if not - there's the hole in your observation ;)  there's necessarily plenty of head faking going on - and if you're missing that AP, Reuters, CNN, Guardian, et al are the media wing of the clown network's corporate branch - welp, there's another gaping hole in the analysis.

 

Joe, you're still as delusional as before bro. 

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, C T said:

 

Joe, you're still as delusional as before bro. 

So you havent figured out that over time, the perversion of government enabled the perversion of law, which enabled the perversion of money, which enabled the almost completely thorough perversion of the media, as it just keeps having to be used to cover for an ever increasing amount of ridiculous stories where the truth is so strange, any of the fictions resembling it really arent believable at all?  :D

 

Seriously though man...I've been posting example after example for a damned long time that shows how the perverted government networks overlapped and had a revolving door with the corporate networks, and they worked hand in hand with similar networks in other countries!  There's been instance after instance where the media has not only carried water for, but worked hand in hand with their government partners in crime.  Perhaps you think that these networks working together dont wind up aggregating to a higher authority, but the setup is pretty clear - nearly all governments on planet earth were subverted to a measure - and the cia & mi5.6 had a LOT to do with ALL OF IT.  The bankers owned England in the 1600s, bro...you think they havent been at this game a long ass time?  Its a nice way to look at the world, where such evil could not exist.  But it is naive.

 

I guess you can wait until the end of The Sixth Sense to get your confirmation that Bruce Willis was indeed dead the whole movie, but the observant noticed the clues that started early on in the movie ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Stosh said:

Perversion of money ?

 

Spoiler

ROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:
Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan
Albania: Bank of Albania
Algeria: Bank of Algeria
Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina
Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia
Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba
Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia
Austria: Austrian National Bank
Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic
Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas
Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain
Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank
Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados
Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus
Belgium: National Bank of Belgium
Belize: Central Bank of Belize
Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority
Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan
Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia
Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Botswana: Bank of Botswana
Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil
Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank
Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi
Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia
Came Roon: Bank of Central African States
Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada

Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority
Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States
Chad: Bank of Central African States
Chile: Central Bank of Chile
China: The People’s Bank of China
Colombia: Bank of the Republic
Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros
Congo: Bank of Central African States
Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica
Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Croatia: Croatian National Bank
Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba
Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus
Czech Republic: Czech National Bank
Denmark: National Bank of Denmark
Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic
East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank
Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador
Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt
El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States
Estonia: Bank of Estonia
Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia
European Union: European Central Bank
Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji
Finland: Bank of Finland
France: Bank of France
Gabon: Bank of Central African States
The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia
Georgia: National Bank of Georgia
Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank
Ghana: Bank of Ghana
Greece: Bank of Greece
Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala
Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Guyana: Bank of Guyana
Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti
Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority
Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank
Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland
India: Reserve Bank of India
Indonesia: Bank Indonesia
Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq
Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland
Israel: Bank of Israel
Italy: Bank of Italy
Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica
Japan: Bank of Japan
Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan
Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan
Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya
Korea: Bank of Korea
Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic
Latvia: Bank of Latvia
Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon
Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho
Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest)
Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay
Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania
Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg
Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao
Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia
Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar
Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi
Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia
Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Malta: Central Bank of Malta
Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius
Mexico: Bank of Mexico
Moldova: National Bank of Moldova
Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia
Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro
Morocco: Bank of Morocco
Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique
Namibia: Bank of Namibia
Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal
Netherlands: Netherlands Bank
Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles
New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua
Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria
Norway: Central Bank of Norway
Oman: Central Bank of Oman
Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan

Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea
Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay
Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru
Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas
Poland: National Bank of Poland
Portugal: Bank of Portugal
Qatar: Qatar Central Bank
Romania: National Bank of Romania
Russia: Central Bank of Russia
Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda
San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino
Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa
Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency
Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Serbia: National Bank of Serbia
Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles
Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone
Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore
Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia
Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia
Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands
South Africa: South African Reserve Bank
Spain: Bank of Spain
Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka
Sudan: Bank of Sudan
Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname
Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland
Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank
Switzerland: Swiss National Bank
Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan
Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania
Thailand: Bank of Thailand
Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO)
Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga
Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago
Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia
Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey
Uganda: Bank of Uganda
Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine
United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates
United Kingdom: Bank of England
United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York
Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu
Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela
Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam
Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen
Zambia: Bank of Zambia
Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
The FED and the IRS
FACT: US Federal Reserve is a privately-owned company, sitting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, joeblast said:

So you havent figured out that over time, the perversion of government enabled the perversion of law, which enabled the perversion of money, which enabled the almost completely thorough perversion of the media, as it just keeps having to be used to cover for an ever increasing amount of ridiculous stories where the truth is so strange, any of the fictions resembling it really arent believable at all?  :D

 

Seriously though man...I've been posting example after example for a damned long time that shows how the perverted government networks overlapped and had a revolving door with the corporate networks, and they worked hand in hand with similar networks in other countries!  There's been instance after instance where the media has not only carried water for, but worked hand in hand with their government partners in crime.  Perhaps you think that these networks working together dont wind up aggregating to a higher authority, but the setup is pretty clear - nearly all governments on planet earth were subverted to a measure - and the cia & mi5.6 had a LOT to do with ALL OF IT.  The bankers owned England in the 1600s, bro...you think they havent been at this game a long ass time?  Its a nice way to look at the world, where such evil could not exist.  But it is naive.

 

I guess you can wait until the end of The Sixth Sense to get your confirmation that Bruce Willis was indeed dead the whole movie, but the observant noticed the clues that started early on in the movie ;)

 

My position has been consistent all along - Im not taking sides - certainly my criticisms of Trump should not be indicative of support for his critics and those you call clowns, but merely a wish to pay attention to the details, many of which are self inflicted, of a gradual disintegration of a figure in an uncomfortable, ill-prepared position of power who keeps shooting himself in the foot. Its a comedy of errors somewhat, and thats what sustains my interest in this current time of the state of affairs in the US. Im constantly amazed by the amount of leeway afforded this guy - like, aren't any of you even slightly embarrassed by the never-ending bloopers that come out of this individual and his immediate circle of staffers, that, by their own actions, clearly show that the WH is underperforming due to a leader that has no clear idea of even the most basic function, that of manning a proper management structure and administering accordingly? Instead, you have a whole administration consisting of would-be heads of depts who are all in acting roles, unsure of their responsibilities, resulting in resignation after resignation, and those that remain whose loyalties are predicated on blind worship and zero accountability demanded of them due to the interimness of their appointments.  

 

Anyway, having learnt from previous experience, im not going to continue indulging in back and forths here as its a waste of time and energy. You guys have fun. :)

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Stosh said:

Its a matter of time, at some point they will be regulated or broken up much like the telecoms of the past....

It will be harder, the same underling causes prompting are there...

 

Yes ,it would be much harder than the telecoms , so how do you envision they would do it, what would they look like ? 

 

I think it's already started.  All sides realize they cannot control social media platforms. They are entities unto themselves.

 

In most instances are there countries understanding this directly control the technology and use of it, notably China.

 

The u.s. is a little different in that it's going through a stage where the vaunted multiculturalism is actually working against itself.

 

Each group trying to get as much as the free stuff as possible.

 

The contenders from the Dims, understanding us all promise to give more and more free stuff.

 

What it will eventually look like will be something like what is being done in China right now.

 

Indirectly through credit scores people's behavior is already being modified.  In some companies health insurance for example, it's cheaper for those who actively take charge of their lifestyles and attempt to live healthier ones.

 

Culture itself is the basic glue the tends to mitigate a lot of behavior.  In Asian countries this is very strong, with a long history.

 

Keep America great,  is a way of emphasizing community through shared interest defining a culture.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, windwalker said:

 

And just maybe, you will run for

the office.

 

One thing's for sure.... the next leader will have at his or her disposal a large blueprint of mistakes to use as a format in order to be better guided with more discretion. Anyone that comes after certainly will have a much easier job of gaining public support. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, C T said:

 

My position has been consistent all along - Im not taking sides - certainly my criticisms of Trump should not be indicative of support for his critics and those you call clowns, but merely a wish to pay attention to the details, many of which are self inflicted, of a gradual disintegration of a figure in an uncomfortable, ill-prepared position of power who keeps shooting himself in the foot. Its a comedy of errors somewhat, and thats what sustains my interest in this current time of the state of affairs in the US. Im constantly amazed by the amount of leeway afforded this guy - like, aren't any of you even slightly embarrassed by the never-ending bloopers that come out of this individual and his immediate circle of staffers, that, by their own actions, clearly show that the WH is underperforming due to a leader that has no clear idea of even the most basic function, that of manning a proper management structure and administering accordingly? Instead, you have a whole administration consisting of would-be heads of depts who are all in acting roles, unsure of their responsibilities, resulting in resignation after resignation, and those that remain whose loyalties are predicated on blind worship and zero accountability demanded of them due to the interimness of their appointments.  

 

Anyway, having learnt from previous experience, im not going to continue indulging in back and forths here as its a waste of time and energy. You guys have fun. :)

Well, part of your issue is that you've accepted what's been put in front of you by the MSM, whereas I've actually done a decent amount of digging on what's been going on.  There's quite a bit happening, if you havent noticed.  (I know, you just stated you havent really been paying attention - which is why its somewhat amusing that you're so convinced he's a buffoon, if you really havent paid much attention and are pretty much only going by a handful of headlines.  Its not exactly an informed position, though.)

 

It'll be more noticeable when the winning switches from esoteric to exoteric :D  A lot of things needed to happen for such a shift.

 

Just dont forget that things changed in Benghazi 2012, when the good guys got their hands on the Clinton Foundation server located there and got knowledge of just what the fk the "Clinton Foundation" was really doing.  The world owes Glen & Tyrone a massive debt and posthumous CMOH for what they did, for what they revealed.

 

and THAT, is why Orange Man Bad ;)its not necessarily ironic that it has little to do with Orange Man himself, but the bankster lackeys' networks losing their grip

Edited by joeblast
these things only make sense when the evil elements are included
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, C T said:

 

One thing's for sure.... the next leader will have at his or her disposal a large blueprint of mistakes to use as a format in order to be better guided with more discretion. Anyone that comes after certainly will have a much easier job of gaining public support. 

 

What they will have is a blueprint of an elected official focused on doing what they were elected for.

 

They've already experienced the last 8 years of an Administration ran on an ideology, couched in a smooth-talking format developed by a  professor from academia, student of Saul Alinsky. 

 

We now have people from the same party running on giving away free stuff, supporting their own ideologies based on socialism. 

 

One thing I've always noted,  they all like to give away free stuff until it's there's stuff that they're giving away.

 

They never managed to do that.

 

Why is that

 

  

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, joeblast said:

Well, part of your issue is that you've accepted what's been put in front of you by the MSM, whereas I've actually done a decent amount of digging on what's been going on.  There's quite a bit happening, if you havent noticed.  (I know, you just stated you havent really been paying attention - which is why its somewhat amusing that you're so convinced he's a buffoon, if you really havent paid much attention and are pretty much only going by a handful of headlines.  Its not exactly an informed position, though.)

 

It'll be more noticeable when the winning switches from esoteric to exoteric :D  A lot of things needed to happen for such a shift.

 

Just dont forget that things changed in Benghazi 2012, when the good guys got their hands on the Clinton Foundation server located there and got knowledge of just what the fk the "Clinton Foundation" was really doing.  The world owes Glen & Tyrone a massive debt and posthumous CMOH for what they did, for what they revealed.

 

and THAT, is why Orange Man Bad ;)its not necessarily ironic that it has little to do with Orange Man himself, but the bankster lackeys' networks losing their grip

 

One can do better than to justify mismanagement due to previous administrative errors. Even a novice manager will have learnt this, hopefully, if they have even a smidgen of intelligence. But I like your onslaught of assumptions that others have fallen short on their attentiveness to whats really going on. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, C T said:

 

One can do better than to justify mismanagement due to previous administrative errors. Even a novice manager will have learnt this, hopefully, if they have even a smidgen of intelligence. But I like your onslaught of assumptions that others have fallen short on their attentiveness to whats really going on. lol

It appears you also missed out on the massive exodus in the legislature, in the justice branches, in the courts...

 

bro, the networks of subversion...what do you think they do....they subvert the laws of the country.  like what I just posted to ralis, where a judge decides to break federal laws because it helps further subvert the country to have shit tons of illegals to help inflate voter rolls where needed.

 

trump has given some a chance, and if they step out of line he fires 'em.    some get brought in to do certain jobs and once the task is complete they move on and someone else goes to the position.  sometimes people have gone from one position to another to another (eg pompeo.)

 

its literally a fight for the future of the planet - do you want to live on Bankster Planet where the governments & their agents act like V for Vendetta?  or do you want to have a peaceful rational law abiding society that doesnt have a two tiered justice system, one of which is applied to the players in the subversion networks, one that applies to the rest of everyone.

 

so a lot of this movement is getting bad players to reveal themselves, too - why all the leak this and leak that, why doesnt it really happen anymore?  except where this asshat leaked the ICE raids - oops that ammo's expended now, it cant be used again.  that's what I mean by ammo is expensive.  once an asset gets used at this stage of the game, most of the are single-use characters.

 

that's why I said the central banks must die, they must go the way of the dodo, they are obsolete and nothing but parasites on humanity.  the BIS and all related entities must be taken to the woodshed and be hacked apart unmercifully, and the nations of the world should all feast upon the remains equally.

 

it was the perversion of money that necessitated the creation of the subversion networks (which are really simply sort of just letting corrupt players do what they will naturally - but only if they are on board and can be controlled!  dissenters are eliminated!)

 

its all to uphold the primary fraud - the ongoing theft of the fruits of people's labor

 

 

 

 

 

I'm more focused on the big picture here - trivial details like "oh, they appear to be in disarray, the papers even said so!" just doesnt even blip my radar.

Edited by joeblast
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.