Sign in to follow this  
Brian

London Bridge

Recommended Posts

41 minutes ago, Apech said:

 

 

Don't forget it is just karma LOL.

Islam doesn't have the concept of karma.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Marblehead said:

Islam doesn't have the concept of karma.

 

It's Allah's will.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Brian said:

It's Allah's will.

 

 

It's the will of Allah then you die.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Apech said:

 

 

It's the will of Allah then you die.

Today is a good day to die.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Gerard said:

 

Because that is her karma. From an event that was unsolved x lifetimes before.

 

Karma is not always instant (more evolved souls experience this one) or later on in their lives, younger souls go through non-linear karma (one that is experienced many lifetimes later).

 

The gravity of the unethical/immoral act will determine the quality of the future life + plane of existence where one is reborn.

 

But didn't the killer commit an unethical act too? For which he will have to be punished by another unethical act in the future?

 

How can this ever end?

 

I think your logic is flawed...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Aetherous said:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/17239/watch-london-mayor-asked-about-400-jihadis-still-amanda-prestigiacomo#

How on Earth is this guy still in his position? Note that he also was the criminal defendant for numerous terrorists prior to becoming Mayor.

the UK have a serious political correctness Problem. do you know the Rotherham scandal? Where 1400 Girls have been raped and the Police did nothing because they feared being called racist?

Or that in certain parts of Citys the have sharia Courts?

When conservative christians walk with crosses through muslim populated Areas and the muslims get aggressive then the Police Comes to take the christians away to prison, not the muslims who tried to hit them etc.

Also there is a large muslim Population in London.

best

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to stir the pot. I'm very much glad that the terrorists weren't able to obtain guns while the police were. The police could kill the attackers in 8 minutes and many of those attacked will survive with the death rate comparatively low. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Apech said:

 

 

It's the will of Allah then you die.

That may be but I'm pretty sure I would take some with me.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Jetsun said:

Just to stir the pot. I'm very much glad that the terrorists weren't able to obtain guns while the police were. The police could kill the attackers in 8 minutes and many of those attacked will survive with the death rate comparatively low. 

 

If only the victims were allowed to be armed, the death rate would be even lower.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Marblehead said:

Iran got hit by terrorists this morning.  I wonder how the West is going to explain this.

 

 

The Iranian Parliament responded by standing and chanting "Death to America."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Brian said:

The Iranian Parliament responded by standing and chanting "Death to America."

Talk about having your head up your ass, ...

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Marblehead said:

Talk about having your head up your ass, ...

 

 

Big Satan, Little Satan.

 

I stick with my prediction that Iran will respond by increasing violence against Israel.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Brian said:

Big Satan, Little Satan.

 

I stick with my prediction that Iran will respond by increasing violence against Israel.

And I predict that if it does Iran will no longer be found on any current world map.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Marblehead said:

And I predict that if it does Iran will no longer be found on any current world map.

 

 

Heck slow down with that WWIII thing!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Apech said:

 

Heck slow down with that WWIII thing!

Well, if things don't start mellowing out it will be either that or world wide civil unrest before too long.

 

But then, if it does happen I doubt any nation will be willing to go to war over it.  The Russians and a few other nations can get their needed oil elsewhere.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The problem with a lot of whats going on is the lack of understanding and will of the west..

First understand whats really happening.

Second have the will to do what it takes to Eliminate the Threat.

 

They understand what they're doing, why and the how....

What will it take for the west to listen...

 

Quote

Are all religions really the same? 
Is "Islamophobia" a bigger problem than Islamic terror?
Is it really even a "phobia"... or is Islam genuinely different?
Let's find out.  Let's keep score during Islam's holiest month.

(June 7th) Note : Islamic terrorists killed people in
21 countries during the first 12 days of Ramadan 2017. 
 

 

Ramadan-Bombathon-2017.jpg?12

https://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

Edited by windwalker
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a reminder that it is Election Day in the U.K. and the voting public will decide who will form the government which will have to deal with the mess.

 

The choice is I am afraid very much between the devil and the deep blue sea but should the Socialists gain power then we in the U.K. will have a government led by Jeremy Corbyn. This is a man whose whole life has been dedicated to a to a hatred of Britain and support of those who use terror to attack our traditional values and way of life.

 

Should Corbyn come to power things will start to become very interesting very quickly.

Edited by Chang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, Chang said:

Just a reminder that it is Election Day in the U.K. and the voting public will decide who will form the government which will have to deal with the mess.

 

The choice is I am afraid very much between the devil and the deep blue sea but should the Socialists gain power then we in the U.K. will have a government led by Jeremy Corbyn. This is a man whose whole life has been dedicated to a to a hatred of Britain and support of those who use terror to attack our traditional values and way of life.

 

Should Corbyn come to power things will start to become very interesting very quickly.

 

That's not exactly true. Corbyn just isn't keen on killing people abroad for oil and gas. He says wars in the middle East contribute to terrorism, which is a point agreed upon by many people on both sides, such as the current Foreign Secretary. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Jetsun said:

 

That's not exactly true. Corbyn just isn't keen on killing people abroad for oil and gas. He says wars in the middle East contribute to terrorism, which is a point agreed upon by many people on both sides, such as the current Foreign Secretary. 

 

An over simplification. Corbyn is a Cultural Marxist who supports unrestricted immigration into the U.K. and Europe. He has also voted consistently against any legislation which can be used in the war against the terrorists. It would be one thing to campaign against your nation's involvement and interference in the business of other countries but quite another thing to fail abysmally in the care and protection of your own countrymen.

 

Whilst we appear to be living in a lunatic asylum I would suggest that putting one of the lunatics in charge can only lead to more chaos and spread of insanity.

 

 

Edited by Chang
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Chang said:

 

An over simplification. Corbyn is a Cultural Marxist who supports unrestricted immigration into the U.K. and Europe. He has also voted consistently against any legislation which can be used in the war against the terrorists. It would be one thing to campaign against your nation's involvement and interference in the business of other countries but quite another thing to fail abysmally in the care and protection of your own countrymen.

 

Whilst we appear to be living in a lunatic asylum I would suggest that putting one of the lunatics in charge can only lead to more chaos and spread of insanity.

 

 

 

He votes against things which restrict human rights, while the current government massively cut police spending. Who is really the one failing to protect the people? Corbyn is about the only person who says we should take a stand against Saudi Arabia, who are the world exporters of Terrorism and ISIS's number one funder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
45 minutes ago, Chang said:

 

An over simplification. Corbyn is a Cultural Marxist who supports unrestricted immigration into the U.K. and Europe. He has also voted consistently against any legislation which can be used in the war against the terrorists. It would be one thing to campaign against your nation's involvement and interference in the business of other countries but quite another thing to fail abysmally in the care and protection of your own countrymen.

 

Whilst we appear to be living in a lunatic asylum I would suggest that putting one of the lunatics in charge can only lead to more chaos and spread of insanity.

 

 

 

Theresa May has presided over a 20,000 cut in police numbers and wants, as part of her response to terrorism to regulate the internet and make file encryption illegal - which as far as I can see has no relevance to the actual attacks.  She presents herself as 'strong and stable' but actually regularly makes u turns on major policy areas, she is disengaged with people generally and stands fort he vested interest of corporate capitalism.  She also voted against some of the terror legislation which Corbyn opposed.  I think she would make the worst possible person to negotiate Brexit and would do so from a basis of a complete lack of trust.  Her 'no deal is better than a bad deal' would be a disaster - whatever else happens we need to preserve some trading possibilities with Europe.

 

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7.6.2017 at 9:41 AM, Gerard said:

 

Because that is her karma. From an event that was unsolved x lifetimes before.

 

Karma is not always instant (more evolved souls experience this one) or later on in their lives, younger souls go through non-linear karma (one that is experienced many lifetimes later).

 

The gravity of the unethical/immoral act will determine the quality of the future life + plane of existence where one is reborn.

 

Rebirth in hell is a very scary and nasty place but I can assure you every single one of us has been reborn in that dreadful place at one point in our samsaric journey. 

 

 

They will have to repay that karmic debt in a future lifetime, dear friend...unfortunately.

 

Btw, since you are a follower of ancient Egyptian thought:

 

"To be true of voice was to live in accordance with Maat’s dictates: “Cool of mouth, friendly and silent, quiet of heart, harmonious of nature, free from passions.” Such was the sage of ancient Egypt."(https://www.theosophyforward.com/theosophical-encyclopedia/1238-ancient-egyptian-religion-part-two)

 

They were too very aware of the workings of karma...unlike the vast majority of modern humans especially rulers of society and profit-making individuals.

 

Best wishes :)
 

 

 

On 7.6.2017 at 8:37 PM, Michael Sternbach said:

 

But didn't the killer commit an unethical act too? For which he will have to be punished by another unethical act in the future?

 

How can this ever end?

 

I think your logic is flawed...

 

 

Am I still going to get a reply to this? I would really know how a karma theorist would explain the afore-mentioned oxymoron.

 

And, by the same token, the unfairness of that woman being punished for an act she commited long ago, when (according to that theory) her 'victim' at that time was of necessity just another former evil-doer who deserved the punishment dealt out by her on behalf of the divine punishing mechanism.

 

:huh:

Edited by Michael Sternbach

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this