Dao and Brahman - They are non-different

[dwai]

http://www.mukti.world/2018/04/dao-and-brahman-they-are-non-different.html

[Lost in Translation]

I read this topic as "Dao and Batman - They are non-different" and got really excited to hear your thesis... 

[9th]

Movement and stillness...

 

... and action-packed vigilante antics!

[Michael Sternbach]

17 hours ago, Lost in Translation said:

I read this topic as "Dao and Batman - They are non-different" and got really excited to hear your thesis... 

 

Hope that this will cheer you up...

 

 

[Starjumper]

19 hours ago, Lost in Translation said:

I read this topic as "Dao and Batman

 

 Me 2

[s1va]

@dwai - Nice write up! Are you the author? It sounded like some of your old posts on comparison between Jing, Qi, Shen & Ojas, Prana, Tejas.

[9th]

30 minutes ago, Boundlesscostfairy said:

STUFF

 

 

IMHO

or just

IMO

[dwai]

 

19 minutes ago, Jeff said:

Also, most modern physics believe that there are multiple concurrent universes, as it is the only way they can get any of the math to work correctly. Similarly, there is no text that states that the Dao emerged from the Void. The “One” emerged from the Dao, and the Dao does not equal the One. Also, you can find a similar concept in Buddhism where emptiness does not equal the Void either.

 

There is nothing other than the Dao. So -- Void, Dao, One, two, three or 10,000 things are not separate. And there is no independent existence of the 10,000 things (ie material/objective reality). 

 

[Jeff]

1 hour ago, dwai said:

 

There is nothing other than the Dao. So -- Void, Dao, One, two, three or 10,000 things are not separate. And there is no independent existence of the 10,000 things (ie material/objective reality). 

 

 

Totally agree.  The void is more like an aspect (or subset) of the Dao.

[dwai]

17 hours ago, s1va said:

@dwai - Nice write up! Are you the author? It sounded like some of your old posts on comparison between Jing, Qi, Shen & Ojas, Prana, Tejas.

Shh...don't reveal my secrets