Cobie

@Mark Foote hi ducky

Hi. Welcome to the forum. @Nungali is an expert.

I stop.

There’s only one standard translation, it is called the "received copy’; most translations are merely ‘interpretations’ of this same old standard translation.

Well you wouldn’t, it’s the girls night out.

There’s no 有 and 無 in it, the oldest version has 又 and 亡 (Guodian, Terebess, Henricks 2000: 又 亡 之 相 生 也 )

If it needs a commentary, it’s a mistranslation.

surely it's here https://terebess.hu/english/tao/amb.pdf

Hi. Welcome to the forum.

.

That’s what you believe.

Hi Christopher. Welcome to the forum. Good to hear you “love everything about energy”

Welcome to the forum.

The standard translation of the DDJ is a forgery!

This may be ‘folie à deux’.