old3bob Posted 23 hours ago 1 hour ago, Nungali said: Dont worry about that .... would you like some gold ? or $2k Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 21 hours ago (edited) 3 hours ago, Nungali said: Ohhh but it got much better ( and deeper and more magical and spiritual ) ; It might even be relevant to what is getting at you now ? (if you get the lyrics ) ; that sounds like wanna be hip bullshit... there is not much to get other than dark rage, blaming God, Jesus or Spirit and not seeing our karma thus the singers lyrics and the tone of music is in a way glorifying hellish inner states of conflict and gnawing doubt or a false view about Spirit, thus not magical or spiritual, get it? Edited 20 hours ago by old3bob 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith108 Posted 21 hours ago (edited) On 1/9/2026 at 6:07 PM, zerostao said: I'm no Buddhist, isn't there a quote along the lines of "With our thoughts we make our world" ? This. If all one sees is evil, then the world is evil. Turning off the news and not doom scrolling all the time helps to see things as they are. Good and evil are always present. Originally though, good and evil are empty. Now, where do thoughts come from? That's the question that liberates. _/|\_ Edited 20 hours ago by Keith108 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 20 hours ago 2 minutes ago, Keith108 said: This. If all one sees is evil, then the world is evil. Turning off the news and not doom scrolling all the time helps to see things as they are. Good and evil are always present. Originally though, good and evil are empty. Now, where do thoughts come from? That's the question that liberates. _/|\_ real good/Spirit is always present but relative good and evil come and go 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
stirling Posted 18 hours ago 2 hours ago, old3bob said: real good/Spirit is always present but relative good and evil come and go …sooooo close my friend… 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 18 hours ago 2 hours ago, old3bob said: that sounds like wanna be hip bullshit... there is not much to get other than dark rage, blaming God, Jesus or Spirit and not seeing our karma thus the singers lyrics and the tone of music is in a way glorifying hellish inner states of conflict and gnawing doubt or a false view about Spirit, thus not magical or spiritual, get it? Errrmmm no the lyrics are not blaming God or Jesus or Spirit ,( they even state; ' no one to blame ' ) - its a lament for the ways things used to be and how they have now broken down . I thought you might relate to it . I know the pieces fit'Cause I watched them fall awayMildewed and smoulderingFundamental differingPure intention juxtaposedWill set two lovers' souls in motionDisintegrating as it goesTesting our communication The light that fueled our fire thenHas burned a hole between us soWe cannot seem to reach an endCrippling our communication I know the pieces fit'Cause I watched them tumble downNo fault, none to blameIt doesn't mean I don't desireTo point the finger, blame the otherWatch the temple topple overTo bring the pieces back togetherRediscover communication The poetry that comes fromThe squaring off betweenAnd the circling is worth itFinding beauty in the dissonance There was a time that the pieces fitBut I watched them fall awayMildewed and smoulderingStrangled by our covetingI've done the math enough to knowThe dangers of our second guessingDoomed to crumble unless we growAnd strengthen our communication Cold silence hasA tendency toAtrophy anySense of compassion as far as calling it 'wanna be hip bullshit ' I guess you dont realize their acclaim and mastery ? eg. Lateralis ; '' The album debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart, selling more than 555,200 copies in its first week of release.[4] It was certified triple platinum by the RIAA on April 15, 2021.[5] On February 13, 2015, the album was certified Gold by the BPI.[6] It was also certified double platinum in both Australia and Canada.[7][8] The band won the Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance for the song "Schism" in 2002.[9] Lateralus was ranked No. 123 on the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's "Definitive 200" list. if you didnt notice ; "Schism" is renowned for its use of uncommon time signatures and the frequency of its meter changes. In one analysis of the song, the song alters meter 47 times.[11] The song begins with two bars of 54, followed by one bar of 44, followed by bars of alternating 58 and 78, until the first interlude, which consists of alternating bars of 68 and 78. The following verse exhibits a similar pattern to the first, alternating bars of 58 and 78. The next section is four bars of 64 followed by one bar of 118. This takes the song back into alternating 58 and 78. Another 68 and 78 section follows, and after this the song goes into repeating bars of 58 and 98. The section ends with the music hanging suspended over a bar of 98. The middle section is subsequently introduced at 3:29, maintaining a group of three bars of 68 then one of 98 until 5:02. Then a series of 84, 104, 84, 84, then 98 heading into "Between supposed lovers..." which is a three bar group of 98, 108 and 98, played twice. It breaks down with a measure of 138 then 98. 58 then 98 repeats 3 times then 58 and 68 once. The signature riff takes over again, 58 then 78. The final riff is 88. The band has referred to the time signature as 6+1⁄28.[12] Not much to get other than blaming God or Jesus ? ! Oldbob ... I do believe you are suffering prejudice . I was supporting your view but apparently you are seeing evil running everywhere in the world .... even where it is not . Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bradley Posted 14 hours ago 6 hours ago, Keith108 said: Originally though, good and evil are empty. Can I ask a question, so I am pretty happy and dont see "evil" running amuck in my own life, but when I think about some of the bad things that have happened in the past 200 years, it seems like there are sometimes these anti-karmic or dark-karma effects in the world. People undertaking "bad" actions many times (but not always) are the ones who accumulate more power, which only extends their ability to do undertake similarly "bad" actions. Most social systems do not reward morality. it seems like they mostly reward risk and aggression, and there is a feed back loop where when someone gains power they are more protected from consequences and and can better shape the rules in their favor. This amoral feedback loop is i guess is slightly different than karma. And, maybe these people do "get theirs" in the end and maybe they are deeply suffering individuals, but I don't think that's always true. Having worked at a large corporation, amorality seemed to be the rule for promotion, not the exception. So is there any validity to this kind of concept? Also, is evil the same as immorality? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 12 hours ago (edited) 11 hours ago, Nungali said: Errrmmm no the lyrics are not blaming God or Jesus or Spirit ,( they even state; ' no one to blame ' ) - its a lament for the ways things used to be and how they have now broken down . I thought you might relate to it . I know the pieces fit'Cause I watched them fall awayMildewed and smoulderingFundamental differingPure intention juxtaposedWill set two lovers' souls in motionDisintegrating as it goesTesting our communication The light that fueled our fire thenHas burned a hole between us soWe cannot seem to reach an endCrippling our communication I know the pieces fit'Cause I watched them tumble downNo fault, none to blameIt doesn't mean I don't desireTo point the finger, blame the otherWatch the temple topple overTo bring the pieces back togetherRediscover communication The poetry that comes fromThe squaring off betweenAnd the circling is worth itFinding beauty in the dissonance There was a time that the pieces fitBut I watched them fall awayMildewed and smoulderingStrangled by our covetingI've done the math enough to knowThe dangers of our second guessingDoomed to crumble unless we growAnd strengthen our communication Cold silence hasA tendency toAtrophy anySense of compassion as far as calling it 'wanna be hip bullshit ' I guess you dont realize their acclaim and mastery ? eg. Lateralis ; '' The album debuted at No. 1 on the Billboard 200 chart, selling more than 555,200 copies in its first week of release.[4] It was certified triple platinum by the RIAA on April 15, 2021.[5] On February 13, 2015, the album was certified Gold by the BPI.[6] It was also certified double platinum in both Australia and Canada.[7][8] The band won the Grammy Award for Best Metal Performance for the song "Schism" in 2002.[9] Lateralus was ranked No. 123 on the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame's "Definitive 200" list. if you didnt notice ; "Schism" is renowned for its use of uncommon time signatures and the frequency of its meter changes. In one analysis of the song, the song alters meter 47 times.[11] The song begins with two bars of 54, followed by one bar of 44, followed by bars of alternating 58 and 78, until the first interlude, which consists of alternating bars of 68 and 78. The following verse exhibits a similar pattern to the first, alternating bars of 58 and 78. The next section is four bars of 64 followed by one bar of 118. This takes the song back into alternating 58 and 78. Another 68 and 78 section follows, and after this the song goes into repeating bars of 58 and 98. The section ends with the music hanging suspended over a bar of 98. The middle section is subsequently introduced at 3:29, maintaining a group of three bars of 68 then one of 98 until 5:02. Then a series of 84, 104, 84, 84, then 98 heading into "Between supposed lovers..." which is a three bar group of 98, 108 and 98, played twice. It breaks down with a measure of 138 then 98. 58 then 98 repeats 3 times then 58 and 68 once. The signature riff takes over again, 58 then 78. The final riff is 88. The band has referred to the time signature as 6+1⁄28.[12] Not much to get other than blaming God or Jesus ? ! Oldbob ... I do believe you are suffering prejudice . I was supporting your view but apparently you are seeing evil running everywhere in the world .... even where it is not . analyzing all that is quite hip, and shrinkable in some ways but we're not really each others shrinks. FYI I was commenting on the earlier posted Judith song thus not the one you posted. But thanks anyway. Scroll back a ways and listen to and watch the Bob Marely video that I posted if you care to, or not. It has no need to tap into dark power. Btw, the following saying is simple and pure, even transcendent in a way without overly lamenting or trying to be profound even if it is profound for a Christian and really for any religion if understood right, "There but for the grace of God go I". Edited 6 hours ago by old3bob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 12 hours ago 2 hours ago, bradley said: Can I ask a question, so I am pretty happy and dont see "evil" running amuck in my own life, but when I think about some of the bad things that have happened in the past 200 years, it seems like there are sometimes these anti-karmic or dark-karma effects in the world. People undertaking "bad" actions many times (but not always) are the ones who accumulate more power, which only extends their ability to do undertake similarly "bad" actions. Most social systems do not reward morality. it seems like they mostly reward risk and aggression, and there is a feed back loop where when someone gains power they are more protected from consequences and and can better shape the rules in their favor. This amoral feedback loop is i guess is slightly different than karma. And, maybe these people do "get theirs" in the end and maybe they are deeply suffering individuals, but I don't think that's always true. Having worked at a large corporation, amorality seemed to be the rule for promotion, not the exception. So is there any validity to this kind of concept? Also, is evil the same as immorality? some deep ideas to think about.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kakapo Posted 10 hours ago 3 hours ago, bradley said: Can I ask a question, so I am pretty happy and dont see "evil" running amuck in my own life, but when I think about some of the bad things that have happened in the past 200 years, it seems like there are sometimes these anti-karmic or dark-karma effects in the world. People undertaking "bad" actions many times (but not always) are the ones who accumulate more power, which only extends their ability to do undertake similarly "bad" actions. Most social systems do not reward morality. it seems like they mostly reward risk and aggression, and there is a feed back loop where when someone gains power they are more protected from consequences and and can better shape the rules in their favor. This amoral feedback loop is i guess is slightly different than karma. And, maybe these people do "get theirs" in the end and maybe they are deeply suffering individuals, but I don't think that's always true. Having worked at a large corporation, amorality seemed to be the rule for promotion, not the exception. So is there any validity to this kind of concept? Also, is evil the same as immorality? Evil exists solely because good people turn a blind eye to it and allow it to continue, and for no other reason. If good people did something about it, it wouldn't and couldn't exist. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith108 Posted 10 hours ago 4 hours ago, bradley said: Can I ask a question, so I am pretty happy and dont see "evil" running amuck in my own life, but when I think about some of the bad things that have happened in the past 200 years, it seems like there are sometimes these anti-karmic or dark-karma effects in the world. People undertaking "bad" actions many times (but not always) are the ones who accumulate more power, which only extends their ability to do undertake similarly "bad" actions. Most social systems do not reward morality. it seems like they mostly reward risk and aggression, and there is a feed back loop where when someone gains power they are more protected from consequences and and can better shape the rules in their favor. This amoral feedback loop is i guess is slightly different than karma. And, maybe these people do "get theirs" in the end and maybe they are deeply suffering individuals, but I don't think that's always true. Having worked at a large corporation, amorality seemed to be the rule for promotion, not the exception. So is there any validity to this kind of concept? Also, is evil the same as immorality? So, neither of us knows the truth. My idea is that the world has been ebbing and flowing with good and evil/immorality since beginningless time. One term for that is samsara. There was a time when you were just minding you own business in some village somewhere, and a hoard of barbarians would ride in and kill all the men, rape all the women, and burn the place to the ground. That's pretty evil, just a different kind, I suppose. In my opinion, it's not any better or worse these days. We are just more aware of it thanks to the little rectangles we carry around all day, filling our minds with little bits of info and mis-info. Opinions are like a$$holes though. Everyone has got one and they all stink. And when, we attach to our opinions, our beliefs, our ideas, we cause suffering for ourselves and the world. The way to cut that particular feedback loop is to wake up from the delusion of our "I, me, my" prison. And then help others do the same. _/|\_ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith108 Posted 10 hours ago 16 minutes ago, kakapo said: Evil exists solely because good people turn a blind eye to it and allow it to continue, and for no other reason. If good people did something about it, it wouldn't and couldn't exist. One time, I asked my teacher: "when will evil end?" He replied: "when you stop doing good". KInd of a zenny answer, but also very deep. Some years ago, a rather eccentric friend of my mine once remarked that evil was necessary to balance good. Kind of a yin/yang thing. That's always been interesting to me. Every time humans try to create a utopia, it's a disaster. It seems we can't function with just the light. I still like ruminate on this one, because it runs against the grain for me. But as OldBob mentioned above, some deep ideas to think about. _/|\_ 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tommy Posted 9 hours ago (edited) 1 hour ago, kakapo said: Evil exists solely because good people turn a blind eye to it and allow it to continue, and for no other reason. If good people did something about it, it wouldn't and couldn't exist. I believe that good and evil is mostly subjective depending upon which side of the fence one is sitting on. For instance, people of the French revolution thought of Marie Antoinette as evil. She was the daughter of royalty forced into a marriage of convenience. Ignored by her husband and others in a foreign land, she did what she knew best. To have parties and enjoy the life of a royal. The French looked upon her actions as evil because it was a mockery of the poor French. And so they tortured her (kept her locked away from her son and daughter) and ending her life by beheading her. Was she really evil? Or was the French who killed her evil? What you say about good and evil is a very simplistic view. That evil is obvious and good is obvious and the two are easily distinguished. Sometimes it isn't that easy. But, hindsight always tells us that it is. Edited 9 hours ago by Tommy 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 5 hours ago (edited) if anything goes and there is not general recognition of dharma and adharma then its open season on any truth, including the Spirit inherent in all Beings but I'd say that is not going to work by paraphrasing the Taoist Sage that basically said, that which is against the great Tao soon perishes... Edited 5 hours ago by old3bob Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 5 hours ago (edited) 4 hours ago, Keith108 said: So, neither of us knows the truth. My idea is that the world has been ebbing and flowing with good and evil/immorality since beginningless time. One term for that is samsara. There was a time when you were just minding you own business in some village somewhere, and a hoard of barbarians would ride in and kill all the men, rape all the women, and burn the place to the ground. That's pretty evil, just a different kind, I suppose. In my opinion, it's not any better or worse these days. We are just more aware of it thanks to the little rectangles we carry around all day, filling our minds with little bits of info and mis-info. Opinions are like a$$holes though. Everyone has got one and they all stink. And when, we attach to our opinions, our beliefs, our ideas, we cause suffering for ourselves and the world. The way to cut that particular feedback loop is to wake up from the delusion of our "I, me, my" prison. And then help others do the same. _/|\_ who knows the exact measure of a cosmic cycle of time although there are some well reasoned estimates, (like the very long but still limited lifetime of Lord Brahma the creator) but they still have beginnings, endings and re-beginnings. The historic Buddha sounded like he alluded to this when he mentioned to Ananda that he could stay until the end of the cycle (in whatever form?) but Ananda missed that didn't he? Edited 5 hours ago by old3bob 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 5 hours ago 8 minutes ago, Apech said: How do we define evil? or also by what it is not Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
liminal_luke Posted 5 hours ago The word "evil" is useful if you´re an author writing a thriller about serial killers. Less useful is you´re trying to have a rational conversation. In practice, it´s usually used by people who want to distance themselves from their shadows through projection (all the bad things I refuse to recognize in myself go in the evil basket). It´s also handy for depressives who want to load up on self-loathing. Evil does exist, I´m pretty sure. But it´s a hard thing to talk about because the word carries too much emotional weight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
old3bob Posted 3 hours ago 1 hour ago, liminal_luke said: The word "evil" is useful if you´re an author writing a thriller about serial killers. Less useful is you´re trying to have a rational conversation. In practice, it´s usually used by people who want to distance themselves from their shadows through projection (all the bad things I refuse to recognize in myself go in the evil basket). It´s also handy for depressives who want to load up on self-loathing. Evil does exist, I´m pretty sure. But it´s a hard thing to talk about because the word carries too much emotional weight. we can over think it but just spell live backwards... which would you rather go with? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keith108 Posted 2 hours ago 3 hours ago, old3bob said: who knows the exact measure of a cosmic cycle of time although there are some well reasoned estimates, (like the very long but still limited lifetime of Lord Brahma the creator) but they still have beginnings, endings and re-beginnings. The historic Buddha sounded like he alluded to this when he mentioned to Ananda that he could stay until the end of the cycle (in whatever form?) but Ananda missed that didn't he? As with good and evil, the three times (past, present, and future) are empty. They have no self nature, and are illusions that keep us locked up in our "self" prisons. I know that sounds crazy but, at least from a Buddhist pov, it's a pretty key teaching. My signature quote starts with some good instruction about how to practice, and then the last line. The last line says essentially, all of the past, present, and future are contained in this moment. One mind moment/infinite kalpas. But, now I am drifting from the topic. Ch. 2 in the DDJ seems to point to these apparent paradoxes of time and good vs. evil: ~ 2 ~ When the whole world knows the pleasing to be pleasing This ends in despising When all know the good to be good In the end there is “not good” Thus, existence and non-existence are born together Difficulty and ease result in each other Long and short are compared to each other Above and below are opposites of each other Noise and tone are harmonized by each other Front and back accompany each other Therefore, sages handle affairs with non-action They practice wordless instruction And the myriad things all take their places Without responding Given life, but not possessed Acted for, but not expected of Perfection is cultivated, and not dwelled upon Surely, what is not dwelled upon Does not leave Gong, Heshang; Lao Tzu. The Heshang Gong Commentary on Lao Zi's Dao De Jing (2nd edition) (p. 46). Center Ring Publishing. Kindle Edition. _/|\_ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cobie Posted 1 hour ago 4 hours ago, old3bob said: if anything goes and there is not general recognition of dharma and adharma then its open season on any truth, including the Spirit inherent in all Beings … I agree. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nungali Posted 57 minutes ago 11 hours ago, old3bob said: analyzing all that is quite hip, and shrinkable in some ways Its called listening to and appreciating good music oldbob . perhaps my excessive interest in timing is due to my interest in drumming . I will hide this so you dont have to look at it Spoiler 11 hours ago, old3bob said: but we're not really each others shrinks. because I posted a song that you might relate to even though it might be called 'heavy metal' , I am now trying to be your psychiatrist ? Is that what you meant ? 11 hours ago, old3bob said: FYI I was commenting on the earlier posted Judith song thus not the one you posted. But thanks anyway. But you put those comments under a quoted post from me , which is why I responded the way I did . By the way , this reply IS meant for you . 11 hours ago, old3bob said: Scroll back a ways and listen to and watch the Bob Marely video that I posted if you care to, or not. It has no need to tap into dark power. Well, I would .... but now , under the risk of you becoming my psychiatrist if I do watch it ....... 11 hours ago, old3bob said: Btw, the following saying is simple and pure, even transcendent in a way without overly lamenting or trying to be profound even if it is profound for a Christian and really for any religion if understood right, "There but for the grace of God go I". Now you seem to be saying if it was not for God 's grace you might have become a heavy metal musician ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steve Posted 31 minutes ago On 1/11/2026 at 11:03 AM, liminal_luke said: It´s often said that the "separate self" does not exist, and I suppose this goes for the self of Gods and Goddesses too. IMO it is an error in view to claim that a separate self "does not exist." Nor did I claim that gods, goddesses, and demons do not exist. That is not my view or the meaning of my posts. I do understand how people can come to that conclusion, sorry to not be more clear. On 1/11/2026 at 11:03 AM, liminal_luke said: If Gods and Goddesses do exist then, at least on some level: they are us and we, them. This, I can get behind... and in front... and in the middle too. "I am he As you are he As you are me And we are all together ... Goo, goo, g'joob!" 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
steve Posted 21 minutes ago 9 hours ago, kakapo said: Evil exists solely because good people turn a blind eye to it and allow it to continue, and for no other reason. If good people did something about it, it wouldn't and couldn't exist. 8 hours ago, Tommy said: I believe that good and evil is mostly subjective depending upon which side of the fence one is sitting on. ... What you say about good and evil is a very simplistic view. That evil is obvious and good is obvious and the two are easily distinguished. Sometimes it isn't that easy. But, hindsight always tells us that it is. I just finished an interesting and entertaining fantasy novel called Babel by RF Kuang. It is an interesting study in good, evil, and perspective set against the background of English colonialism. Not a perfect novel by any stretch but quite compelling overall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites