Germany: Nearly 40 Per Cent of Under Fives Now ‘Migrant Background’

[Golden Dragon Shining]

UK http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/child-sex-abuse-gangs-could-5114029
 

"here could be up to a million victims of child sexual exploitation in the UK, it is feared.
 

Rotherham’s Labour MP Sarah Champion describes it as a “national disaster” and is demanding a taskforce to fight the “horror.”
 

In an exclusive interview with the Daily Mirror the shaken MP has told how she ‘nearly lost her mind’ after victims turned to her for help - unable to trust the police or local council.
 

She is currently getting an average of 10 victims a week coming to her for help.
 

Fighting back tears she told how she feared having a nervous breakdown worried about failing the “amazing women” and her horror after finding out a manual for grooming existed for paedophiles.

 

[Golden Dragon Shining]

Further admission

 

Conference of European Rabbis President says European Jews are 'fighting alongside their Muslim brothers against Old Europe.'

https://twitter.com/_HankRearden/status/782052792227684352

 

These religions have been relentless against Europeans for 1000s of years, Christianity very much part of that.

I hope we are able to find ourselves again after 1000+ odd years of alien ideologies attempting to shape us to suit themselves.

Awaken Ancient Europe,

  Edited October 1, 2016 by Sionnach

[CloudHands]

Guys guys guys... I have no word for you. Hm maybe Allah Ouakbar !

[Karl]

Further admission

 

 

 

These religions have been relentless against Europeans for 1000s of years, Christianity very much part of that.

I hope we are able to find ourselves again after 1000+ odd years of alien ideologies attempting to shape us to suit themselves.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NitqJ1iGKC0

Awaken Ancient Europe,

 

This is the result of debauched Christian thinking creating a foreign policy based on a crusade. It is the final, dreadful result of a philosophy that demands altruistic self sacrifice.

 

I have a radical theory that I've never heard anywhere so let me see if I can expand it:

 

The first Great War 'the war to end all wars' was to be fought like wars of the past. These wars were about fighting men showing immense bravery in the face of the enemy soldiers and fighting at close quarters - cavalry, swords, inaccurate muskets and with the artillery being cannon.

 

However, the war was long and protracted. It was nothing like the glorious wars of the past. It was mechanised killing-industrial war. Huge numbers of young men were wiped out. It was the industrialisation that made it easy to produce the technology to kill on a massive scale. It was no longer the bravery of the soldiers that turned the enemy, but sheer industrial might from the factories of each nation. It allowed a man working on the shop floor, feeding his family, a ruthless killer turning out millions of machine guns, artillery pieces and the ammunition/transport to deliver them. It turned the civilian into as greater enemy as the troops using the machines he produced. It was no longer one man with one musket, but machine guns with interlacing fire capable of killing thousands of men.

 

When the war continued in 1938, there was an understanding, but one that hardly dare be considered at first, that to destroy the enemy was no longer a matter of demoralising his troops, the fight had to be taken to the headlands of each country, to kill the innocent. This was something I suspect that Christians everywhere couldn't stomach. The deaths of non-combatants, the destruction of churches, villages, families was unthinkable, but, slowly it happened. First a few small bombing raids, then eventually Dresden and Tokyo. In Britain we had 'bomber Harris' who was vilified for his part in the mass murder of innocent civilians. Indeed, the bomber forces themselves did not receive medals for taking part in the most succesful raids on Berlin.

 

However, when the soldiers discovered the Jewish concentration camps the people began to justify the vast killing of German non-combatants. The holocaust became a token that justified wars. Instead of wars being considered as purely defensive, now they could be offensive and aimed at freeing potential genocide victims from tyranny. Christian consciousnesses could now sleep easier. They could kill their fellow men if they were tyrants based on genocidal activity. It meant that wars were actually good. That with modern 'surgical' strikes and super accurate weapons we could cut out the cancer of tyranny and free the peoples of the country. You can see this repeated in every recent war. Bush and Blair were both strong Christians who deposed a dictator in order to free the people of Iraq- these were their stated aims and they defend those actions as 'the right thing to do'.

 

It's not just in Europe either. In the US the civil war became associated with 'freeing the slaves' and Lincoln was pretty much made a saint/deity in folklore for his Christian values. Again, the war was justified, the massive killing of civilians was permitted because of an oppressed people. Black slaves became a special case, as are the Jews of Europe and now the Muslims of Syria.

 

These 'noble' wars as they are now thought of, have ceased to be wars to crush enemies, but supposedly to liberate. What was good for Jews and Blacks must then necessarily be good for Muslims.

 

What has been created is something we should have seen coming. It was the tokenism created by a Christian altruistic philosophy that has left us defenceless. The policies of our Governments cannot allow these tokens to be defiled otherwise it unravels 2 centuries of beliefs in Christian moral good. It's the reason why Obama cannot do anything but defend blacks, Jews and now Muslims. Instead the Governments have turned to try and force integration on everyone. They think that we just need to get on in a good Christian altruistic way, to sacrifice some space, wealth to our brothers and we can all have a lovely life. Yet, as we see, in every western country the wheels are coming off-Jews, Muslims and Blacks do not have an ethic of self sacrifice to Christian whites, in most cases quite the opposite-but if Christian whites are following such a rigid philosophy then these other groups aren't 'taking advantage' they are helping Christians to put themselves up on their own crucifixes. If Christian whites wish to turn the other cheek, to sacrifice to their brothers, well no one wants to stop them doing so.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

Regarding industrial

Looking through history

Muslim conquests of India, 2 million to 10 million deaths, 12th to16th century

Three Kingdom War (China), 36 million to 40 million deaths, year 184–280

An Lushan Rebellion (China), 13 million to 36 million deaths, year 755–763

Mongol Conquests (Eurasia), 40 million to 70 million deaths, year 1206–1324

Qing dynasty conquest of Ming Dynasty (China), 25 million deaths, year 1616–1662

 

More at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll

WW1 = 20 million (1914–1918)

WW2 = 40,000,000–85,000,000  (1939–1945)

So Pre Industrial Revolution (1760–1840) was as much or more destructive

Edited October 1, 2016 by Sionnach

[Karl]

Regarding industrial

Looking through history

Muslim conquests of India, 2 million to 10 million deaths, 12th to16th century

Three Kingdom War (China), 36 million to 40 million deaths, year 184–280

An Lushan Rebellion (China), 13 million to 36 million deaths, year 755–763

Mongol Conquests (Eurasia), 40 million to 70 million deaths, year 1206–1324

Qing dynasty conquest of Ming Dynasty (China), 25 million deaths, year 1616–1662

 

More at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wars_by_death_toll

WW1 = 20 million (1914–1918)

WW2 = 40,000,000–85,000,000  (1939–1945)

So Pre Industrial Revolution (1760–1840) was as much or more destructive

Dates and timescales. 100 years vs 5 years and remember that death by starvation is still death if included in wars.

[Karl]

Worth a watch if you have time. It was from this piece by Yarron Brook that I realised the extent of the problem we now face. I knew Bush was a Christian, but Obama/Clinton were democrats, so I had assumed they were atheist/ socialist, but it turns out they are not. They are evangelical Christians. I haven't added in how Christianity and socialism share a commonality of self sacrifice which explains a lot about the UK and the Conservatives seemingly adopting socialist policies as well as Labour adopting Christian values under Blair. The centre ground is a Christian/socialist hybrid - hence Germany has Christian Democrat party under Merkel (the ex GDR pastors daughter) and on which the entire EU is based - that's the entire philosophical underpinnings of the second most powerful continent on the planet ! No wonder the Remainers in the establishment/church fought so hard. The mix of socialism and Christianity is a suicide pill, but one which looks very attractive.

 

[Golden Dragon Shining]

True. Even so, some crazy numbers. Swords and spears hm, up close and personal in the millions.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

Oh yes I agree, Socialism and Christianity have many similarities. It's near identical in some ways, just re-branding really ha, Socialism perhaps a progressed Christianity, minus divinity (Christianity you could say had a false (/no) divinity), the state becomes that. Jesus/ Marx etc.

Edited October 1, 2016 by Sionnach

[Karl]

This is a quote by David Cameron: note it's explicit message of the 'common good'. To honour (duty) our social (ist) obligations (sacrifice) to our communities (commun-ism). This is a mixing of Christian and socialism that now explains what's going on at the heart of the two main parties. Labour want to build socialism and not Christian values. The Conservatives want Christian values without the socialism tag, but the reality is that the 'centre ground' is the merger of both into one and there is no way back. It is why Brexit was so important-it is a refusal of centre ground values. It is almost as significant as the break between Rome and Britain, but the ramifications can't yet be seen.

 

David Cameron has declared that Britain is built on “Christian values” – and must defend them against terrorism.

 

In his message to mark the Christian festival of Easter, the Prime Minister said the religion had “helped to make our country what it is today” and that its values appealed to people “of every faith and none”.

 

“Values of responsibility, hard work, charity, compassion and pride in working for the common good and honouring the social obligations we have to one another, to our families and our communities,” he said.

 

 

“These are values we treasure. They are Christian values and they should give us the confidence to say yes, we are a Christian country and we are proud of it.

 

“But they are also values that speak to everyone in Britain – to people of every faith and none. And we must all stand together and defend them.”

 

But citing the recent terrorist attacks in Brussels, the PM said Britain should not be “cowed” by such violence.

 

The PM added that the UK must “defeat the pernicious ideology that is the root cause of this terrorism” – without naming it explicitly.

 

The Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury argued in his Easter message that Christians should not be overcome by “fear” because of the attacks.

 

“In much of life fear is a valid and reasonable emotion, but hope always overcomes fear. We fear what we do not know, do not understand or cannot control,” Justin Welby said.

 

“But on Easter Day we remember that Jesus Christ overcame death so that the end of all things is known.”

 

By contrast the Roman Catholic Pope used his address in Rome to condemn those who did not help migrants, arguing that the refugees often “met with rejection from those who would offer them welcome and assistance”.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

Yes a highly destructive ideology. As shown also, both parties for the most part move toward the same objectives, the opposition a facade.

A man nailed to a cross, does that not say it all? people on their knees to it... ha

What are it's origins? It is not native to Europe.

 

Edited October 1, 2016 by Sionnach

[Karl]

Oh yes I agree, Socialism and Christianity have many similarities. It's near identical in some ways, just re-branding really ha, Socialism perhaps a progressed Christianity, minus divinity (Christianity you could say had a false (/no) divinity), the state becomes that. Jesus/ Marx etc.

That's exactly it. If you grasp what Kant did to destroy reason in order to re-establish the power of the church by promoting altruism (self sacrifice/duty to the Church/God) then we see that Hegel took this one step further as did Descartes. Why not kill God and keep the Altruism then make the state/government the principle beneficiary of sacrifice-Marx turned that around and made it 'the collective' that we sacrifice (effectively, he doesn't say sacrifice) to each other-entirely in keeping with Christian principles and no God/ Church is required.

 

Is it any wonder that Islam, BLM, Zionism is emerging into this mess. God isn't dead to these religions and it's very easy to utilise the centre ground politics to expand religious fundamentalism now man has thrown reason away and given Marx to boot. It's like the Middle East just showed up in Europe and we know what happens to the Christians-the Lions await and our Governments/elite have allowed it to happen all because of tokenism. As Camerons Easter speech confirms and Justin Welby makes clear - we needn't worry because Christ overcame death, so, we cannot really die so it's all fine then.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

I think it is far more calculated and sinister

[Karl]

Yes a highly destructive ideology. As shown also, both parties for the most part move toward the same objectives, the opposition a facade.

A man nailed to a cross, does that not say it all? people on their knees to it... ha

What are it's origins? It is not native to Europe. It's as European as Islam.

 

It was only when Christian Europeans became militant that we threw out the aggressors. At this time we understood that we cannot 'turn the other cheek' or 'love thine enemy'. We realised the only approach was to defend ourselves forcefully and we did so until things changed after WW2. This is when we re-embraced the 'love thy neighbour' principles. It also made us vulnerable to the scientific religionism of communism with which it shared it's collectivism.

 

As Rand said Mystics of spirit (religion) Mystics of muscle (communism). The common thread is that of removing reason and Mans conscious volitional identity. It is to subsume the individual into a totalitarian society like an ant, or worker bee. It was why the US rejected religion(spirit mystic) and men (muscle mystic), to make the USA a country of laws protecting the rights of life, liberty, property and pursuit of happiness. Capitalism wasn't a principle of the US Government, but a necessary moral corolary of those rights. The US established 'reason' as it's shining light enshrining life, freedom, property and the pursuit of happiness as the proper moral standards of every man. However, now the US is imperilled and Europe is collapsing. In 50 years we may well be back on our knees facing Mecca or circumcising our babies.

[Karl]

I think it is far more calculated and sinister

Only from the small groups who are fundamentalists, the priests and the academics. We are doing this to ourselves. Evil is weak, it is easy to topple, it relies on apathy, tolerance, non judgement and moral cowardice to grow. I cannot see Christians taking up banners and spears, so it's up to the rest of us to promote reason. To institute judgement and strengthen our own moral core -not as Christians, but as men.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

Yes, reason must triumph again!

Returning to the nature loving philosophers

[Karl]

Yes, reason must triumph again!

Returning to the nature loving philosophers

Thus my spreading of Objectivism and destruction of all kinds of mysticism. Most libertarians see the problem of anti-capitalism at work in our societies and reject foreign policies, but they don't think in a holistic sense. They see everything as abstract. It wouldn't occur to them that the danger might come from religious groups. Certainly its capitalism that has generated our wealth and strength which is now being eroded by the state, but capitalism is like red/white blood cells in the body that keeps disease at bay, but religious philosophy is not a disease of the body, but of the mind. It is the mind which is the tool of survival, so, poison the mind and capitalism dies as a result. This is why the Middle East is so backwards, it isn't that they don't understand capitalism, it's that religion makes it impossible to apply it.

[bax44]

I always find it curious though.. people will tell us to question everything we read, and knowing how easy it is to skew statistics any which way the person doing the statistics wants to... Yet those same people will take said statistics and then create elaborate argumentation around them like they are absolutely 100 percent true. My point is...how the fuck do we really know these numbers they just casually toss around about things like this are even remotely accurate?

Edited October 1, 2016 by bax44

[Golden Dragon Shining]

What numbers? The conflicts are estimates, some on that list range from between 8 million to 100 million... ha..

Edited October 2, 2016 by Sionnach

[Golden Dragon Shining]

.

Edited October 18, 2016 by Sionnach

[redcairo]

I recall reading historical stuff where (in the USA) people were freaking out about immigrants. Funny thing, of course, since at least today, legal immigrants on the whole are vastly more employed / less criminal / more productive than the same 'average' of those born here. And of course, immigration built our nation.

 

The thing is though, historically, they were upset because of:

 

1 - race

 

2 - nationality

 

On rare occasion also

 

3 - religion

 

But in NO cases in all this stuff I saw, were they faced with "and this set of immigrants has an ideology that in any past historical time, admitting to would pretty much get you either killed or banished as an outright menace to society and government both."

 

That part seems a bit new to the more modern day.

 

PJ

[joeblast]

that's because invasions of old didnt normally have the king's permission to invade

[Karl]

that's because invasions of old didnt normally have the king's permission to invade

 

http://www.historyextra.com/article/international-history/medieval-immigrants-moving-england-middle-ages

 

 

not actually true. Invaders come armed and ready to take over a government by force. We had lots of immigrants throughout British history.

 

Of course the democratic system means that they often become part of the socialist vote and the priviliges that can bring through bribery for that vote.

[Golden Dragon Shining]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/19/home-office-admits-checks-on-child-refugees-in-calais-are-limite/

~

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/the-guardian/20161025
 

Edited October 26, 2016 by Sionnach

[joeblast]

http://www.historyextra.com/article/international-history/medieval-immigrants-moving-england-middle-ages

 

 

not actually true. Invaders come armed and ready to take over a government by force. We had lots of immigrants throughout British history.

 

Of course the democratic system means that they often become part of the socialist vote and the priviliges that can bring through bribery for that vote.

yes, which is quite different than the king deciding he doesnt really like most of his subjects and inviting the invaders in to come mingle with his women subjects in order to breed out certain things.