Thunder_Gooch Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.psyleron.com/reg1_lite.aspx http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/index.html Princeton is using random event generators (like coin flips but thousands of time a second) to to show that statistically we can influence the probability of random events. It's very fascinating stuff. Has anyone here considered one of these units as a training feedback mechanism? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goldisheavy Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.psyleron.com/reg1_lite.aspx http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/index.html Princeton is using random event generators (like coin flips but thousands of time a second) to to show that statistically we can influence the probability of random events. It's very fascinating stuff. Has anyone here considered one of these units as a training feedback mechanism? It's an interesting idea. But why use this as a feedback and not anything else? My guess is that if the tiniest fluctuations within "random" data is all that your mind can tolerate, it's a good start. At the same time, I am thinking that if you're ready to experiment in this way, you are probably ready to tolerate a bit more influence on appearances than that. This approach is good when you're trying to convince a physicalist of the mind's influence on or inseparability from the environment. It's because the physicalists will pretty much dismiss out of hand anything even slightly more impressive than this. So you need this kind of approach to get your foot in the door, if you want to have a dialogue with the physicalists. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thunder_Gooch Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=...?v=719218268763 some interesting video on the subject. My interest in this device is one of training via a feedback mechanism during my training. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
goldisheavy Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=...?v=719218268763 some interesting video on the subject. My interest in this device is one of training via a feedback mechanism during my training. That's a cool video. I think it might be a good idea to use these devices for training. Why not? They have one good quality in that they are very sensitive. I would probably go for the lamp though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ohm-Nei Posted December 9, 2009 my mind wants to dive into this topic but my conscience is telling me to save my energy Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
宁 Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.psyleron.com/reg1_lite.aspx http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/index.html Princeton is using random event generators (like coin flips but thousands of time a second) to to show that statistically we can influence the probability of random events. It's very fascinating stuff. Has anyone here considered one of these units as a training feedback mechanism? fascinating indeed... but how does the training actually work? i didn't understand one iota out of that site Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
enouch Posted December 9, 2009 http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=...?v=719218268763 some interesting video on the subject. My interest in this device is one of training via a feedback mechanism during my training. Interesting video indeed! Yet it brings to life the observation of how primative the western mind is when dealing with psycho-spiritual effects.We're still trying to gain acknowledgement of metaphysics,while people like Wim Hoff,Swami Rama,John Chang, Pralad Jani, Wang liping, and other yogis are performing incredible feats! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thunder_Gooch Posted December 10, 2009 fascinating indeed... but how does the training actually work? i didn't understand one iota out of that site the random event generator is like flipping a coin thousands of times each second, the baseline graph is displayed it seems conscious observers have an actual effect over the baseline probability. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TTT Posted December 10, 2009 I read the priceton university has been closed. It's over. Dean Radin and the other "scientist" who made the experiments did not really do their experiments according to the scientific rules. Dean Radin went now to the institute for noetic sciences (founded by some astronaut who went to the moon) To bad fox... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Thunder_Gooch Posted December 10, 2009 I read the priceton university has been closed. It's over. Dean Radin and the other "scientist" who made the experiments did not really do their experiments according to the scientific rules. Dean Radin went now to the institute for noetic sciences (founded by some astronaut who went to the moon) To bad fox... Do you have any information this you can share, a link would be nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smile Posted December 10, 2009 I read the priceton university has been closed. It's over.Dean Radin and the other "scientist" who made the experiments did not really do their experiments according to the scientific rules. Doesn't matter. Create your own truth. "Do not go where the path may lead, instead go where there is no path and leave a trail." Ralph Waldo Emerson Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
voidisyinyang Posted December 14, 2009 http://paranormaltrickster.blogspot.com/20...boratories.html Share this post Link to post Share on other sites