Jump to content


Photo

Off Topic Discussions


  • Please log in to reply
86 replies to this topic

#1 Yueya

Yueya

    月牙 yuèyá (Crescent Moon)

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 708 posts
  • Gender:None Selected
  • Location:silent places, dark ambiguity
  • Interests:valley spirit recluse

Posted 04 January 2017 - 01:10 PM

It seems to me that the root if this is having a sub forum called *Off-Topic* . Since it is not dedicated to discussions related to any of the topics we can find in General, Daoist etc. people will identify it as total freedom space.

 

So even if you put in bold, in capital letters,in an audio file that **forum rules apply** some people won't hear that because they will immediately feel that it is censorship, whatever grounds you give to the rules.

 

And when it comes to politics, it just becomes totally wild and out of control We can see so called spiritual seekers turning into completely polarized internet beasts and it becomes impossible and pointless to discuss with them.

 

Just like people in TDB who want to show that their school can pee way farther than any other.

 

One can notice that those kind of battles are always conducted in the name of *truth* ( hey, I am of this X school and in the name of Truth I can let people say this or that etc.), *freedom* (In the name of truth and freedom of speech, I must say this and that and the Admin can't muzzle me etc. otherwise the admin is just another a*****ole), and the same for *justice* etc.

 

You know it is perhaps and probably just me but one reason I wanted to learn more about Lao-Tzu and Zhuang Zi was that they found no real meaning in all this worldy and petty matters. The world is full of ugliness, not because it is its intrinsic quality but because people bring their ugly minds and actions in it. As soon as one diminishes all worldly desires, the environment around becomes a more peaceful place. I have really, really, really hard time to see how being involved in politics (and heart/mind is the root of any involvement as far as I can see) can bring any peace internally and externally. What politics did Daoists in the mountains and in caves, Christians in the deserts, Buddhists in their forest or caves?

 

Anyway, the only solution to this recurrent situation at TDB may be to close the off topic section. At least, it will limit the problems to Mopai etc. which is enough to keep the mods busy.

 
To my mind, Bubbles raises a number of issues worthy of further discussion.
 
For me, Off Topic discussions are an important part of this forum. It’s there I’ve gained a broader view of other members and this in turn has helped me better understand myself. Also these topics regularly host some of the most vigorously discussions. Hence it’s obvious Dao Members have a great need to express, and hopefully work through, these many and varied issues. And, of course, it also allows the discussion of interesting subjects outside of our main focus. 
 
However, I think it’s important for the health of this site that the focus stays firmly on our central topics. That what gives us some unity amongst our great diversity. That’s the purpose of this site; that’s what makes it meaningful. The web is big place with almost unlimited space for freedom of expression. Dao Bums can never be, and doesn’t need to be, everything for everyone. 
 
A possible way to better achieve these two goals would be to make Off Topic a members only forum. That way these discussions won’t be visible, and hence won’t attract the attention of the thousands of visitors to this site. Visitors here a huge invisible audience; regularly there’s more than ten visitors on board for every member. Hence, if someone wants to join Dao Bums it will be because they’re drawn to the main forums rather than these Off Topic subjects. Also, it will limit those with strong personal political (and other) agendas from exploiting the wide audience that this site attracts to publicize their own agendas. 
 
Further comments most welcome.

 


  • Trunk, liminal_luke, dawei and 5 others said thanks
I inquire, I do not assert, I do not here determine anything with final assurance; I conjecture, try, compare, attempt, ask.......

#2 dawei

dawei

    Dao Bum

  • Admin
  • Pip
  • 8437 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 January 2017 - 01:49 PM

I liked Bubble's posts and glad to see you raise it more as a discussion...   the off-topic forum area, and reminder that rules apply goes back some time... just as the forum Chaos has a reminder that rules apply... there is no "No Rules Apply" area to the forum... as of yet :)

 

I think I would generally disagree with getting rid of off-topic as there is a lot to share and talk about... and to blow off steam... instead of doing that in the other areas.  ;)

 

If you look at off-topic, there are almost NO new members who join just to post there... most of the posters are established members who have learned how to disagree (aka fight) and not take it too personal...  So I am not sure I would agree with the idea that the public viewing attracts new members.

 

I will say that at one time, I personally did turn it off from public viewing... and there was backlash from the membership that they like to view the forum without logging in, and that including Off-topic.   I listened, and I opened it back up.   I like that members want to come back to read, even if not logged in.   This site really serves the members, and by that I tend to likely mean those who have a serious recommendation to make the place better overall...  and this topic can be a discussion in that way.

 

I should close with some history and recent recommendations and folks can comment:

1. Chaos was and maybe is still affectionately known as the PIT...  some habits never die..and that is ok...  and at one time, one could start topics in the PIT... when that was done by a certain member (now banned but wish he would ask to come back),  it was decided that these topics should not be started behind the public curtain anyways as they are too combative... so... starting topics in the PIT was stopped.

2. Folks could start a topic in, let's say off-topic... push the envelope... and get it moved to the PIT...  the Italians have a saying: When there is a law, there is a way around the law... we found that out at TDB :)

3. More recently, at least two folks suggested a sub-forum of off-topic that was more like, off-limits... to suggest, no limit to the topic and that should be non-public...    At the time, my counter comment was: that is the Pit/Chaos...   although I recognize we don't allow new threads there.  Also, I argued, to allow that might suggest we want such controversial topics here.

 

Given the above, I hope others share some thoughts.. thanks for the topic :)


  • zerostao, bubbles, Jeff and 2 others said thanks

#3 Stosh

Stosh

    ¿

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 5234 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 January 2017 - 02:51 PM

I like the idea of there being a pit to shovel difficult threads , which isnt open to public view.

To let folks air out finish their debate ,but not to leave it as a podium for the public eye. ,,

maybe limit the length of how long the thread can go before it predictably terminates on its own , so the mods dont have the burden of having to jump in once its in this pit. 

Ex: it goes to the pit and you've got twenty posts left, then it locks. 


  • zerostao, dawei and Yueya said thanks for this

#4 dawei

dawei

    Dao Bum

  • Admin
  • Pip
  • 8437 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 04 January 2017 - 02:57 PM

I like the idea of there being a pit to shovel difficult threads , which isnt open to public view.

To let folks air out finish their debate ,but not to leave it as a podium for the public eye. ,,

maybe limit the length of how long the thread can go before it predictably terminates on its own , so the mods dont have the burden of having to jump in once its in this pit. 

Ex: it goes to the pit and you've got twenty posts left, then it locks. 

 

That is the basically the current way... but the goal (as discussed with the owner and past admin ideas) is to try and not lock posts... it stops their venting... but as you can see, there are posts locked... so it does at some point still require staff to decide if a Pitted topic has gone too far.        I think you see the Pit/Chaos dilemma :)


  • Stosh, Yueya and Kar3n said thanks for this

#5 Marblehead

Marblehead

    The Wondering Taoist

  • Steward+
  • Pip
  • 36172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida, USA
  • Interests:Short Skirts and Bikinis

Posted 05 January 2017 - 03:28 AM

Long Live The Pit!!!


  • dawei, bubbles and Yueya said thanks for this

I reserve the right to be wrong.

YIN-YANG.jpg I reserve the right to change my mind. Anarchy4.jpg



Peace & Contentment!


#6 dawei

dawei

    Dao Bum

  • Admin
  • Pip
  • 8437 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 January 2017 - 05:27 AM

I'm not sure I'd agree to this, but it would be a legitimate question:  

 

Why not just let the PIT have topics started again ?   Wouldn't that get the questionable stuff out of off-topic faster ?

 

 

After all, it was originally that way...

 

I would only comment that, doing so may appear that TDB is encouraging and condoning certain questionable topics to be started. 

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 

The counter may be:   It still has to stay within forum rules so we end up still having to monitor it.

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 
 
Ok... enough talking to myself...  but willing to listen to what folks think.

  • Marblehead, Stosh, dust and 1 other said thanks

#7 bubbles

bubbles

    Dao Bum

  • The Dao Bums+
  • 1505 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 January 2017 - 05:47 AM

 

I'm not sure I'd agree to this, but it would be a legitimate question:  

 

Why not just let the PIT have topics started again ?   Wouldn't that get the questionable stuff out of off-topic faster ?

 

 

After all, it was originally that way...

 

I would only comment that, doing so may appear that TDB is encouraging and condoning certain questionable topics to be started. 

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 

The counter may be:   It still has to stay within forum rules so we end up still having to monitor it.

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 
 
Ok... enough talking to myself...  but willing to listen to what folks think.

 

 

If I recall it well, it was during the bried period of time I was a mod that viator decided that no new thread could be started in the Pit area.

 

It seems that the question is two-fold:

(1) should be Pit stay under the forum rules?

(2) should members be allowed to start new threads in the Pit?

 

Possible answers are (A=Yes), (B=No)

 

A(1) + A(2) means that it will give more work to mods

A(1) + B(2) is the current situation. Is there any good reason to change that?

B(1) + A(2) means that there would be some aera here running on free wheel with no moderation at all.

B(1) + B(2) means is a reduced version of the previous one but, it could be that some would derail some threads from other areas in order to have the discussion moved into the Pit and have their own party there.

 

My take is that the current situation is fine because the two last options would feed trolls and malevolent members (yes, there are).


Edited by bubbles, 05 January 2017 - 05:48 AM.

  • cheya, cold, zerostao and 3 others said thanks
bubbles

Walk your talk or close your mouth.
Don't whine, just do your best.
Chi Kung for health : Flying Phoenix Celestial Healing Chi Kung of Ehrmeishan

#8 Stosh

Stosh

    ¿

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 5234 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 January 2017 - 09:25 AM

 

I'm not sure I'd agree to this, but it would be a legitimate question:  

 

Why not just let the PIT have topics started again ?   Wouldn't that get the questionable stuff out of off-topic faster ?

 

 

After all, it was originally that way...

 

I would only comment that, doing so may appear that TDB is encouraging and condoning certain questionable topics to be started. 

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 

The counter may be:   It still has to stay within forum rules so we end up still having to monitor it.

 

The counter may be But if its not in public view, why care ?

 
 
Ok... enough talking to myself...  but willing to listen to what folks think.

 

To this , I'm in favor of non-moderated threads in the pit, and if they were started in the pit , then I'd just let em run as long as enthusiasm for the thread exists. 

Not to be confusing , Ill elaborate , free speech isn't allowed generally, there's always someone who thinks they know what should and should not be said by other people, and this censorship is intrusive. Balancing that , there's the issue of creating a spectacle of rough language which the public may stumble into.

If a person is sensitive about words , they can be respected simply by allowing them not to attend threads in the pit,, and if a person wants to give someone a 'piece of their mind'  they could opt to do that in an appropriate setting where they know that readers have chosen to allow it. It would just be a spot to 'let it all hang out'.

I think a policy like this allows moderators and posters to more comfortably deal with various issues, and some of the cool folks that used to be here would still be. 

I just see no reason why Daobums should force Every thing to be moderated. 

 

 

The PC stuff is out of hand .. 

I wandered off to a different forum , and though on my gentlest behavior , the moderator had the infantile gall , to correct me on my punctuation ,and rewrote my post as suited her , She told me that such bad grammar wouldn't be tolerated. I pointed out that her own punctuation was incorrect , (as defined by another source on English grammar.. .. in private) and she told me that her own bad punctuation wasn't the issue ,and didn't matter.  She felt she should and could,  push me around based on her own opinions . I just walked away from it and left her to dominate the folks there who would tolerate it. There is a level which is too much , and each forum should decide if they are going to be PC Nazis or if they are going to try to be a place where folks can participate freely , a reader can and will always vote with their feet , but the forum should consider whether it exists to serve political correctness or its members.


Edited by Stosh, 05 January 2017 - 09:51 AM.

  • dawei and Yueya said thanks for this

#9 Marblehead

Marblehead

    The Wondering Taoist

  • Steward+
  • Pip
  • 36172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida, USA
  • Interests:Short Skirts and Bikinis

Posted 05 January 2017 - 10:01 AM

My opinion hasn't changed.  More threads should be sent to The Pit instead of "Off Topic" and we should be allowed to start threads in The Pit.

 

However, I agree, the root tenants of the forum must be complied with.  (No threats or inspiring violence and no personal attacks.)


  • cold, dawei, bubbles and 3 others said thanks

I reserve the right to be wrong.

YIN-YANG.jpg I reserve the right to change my mind. Anarchy4.jpg



Peace & Contentment!


#10 bubbles

bubbles

    Dao Bum

  • The Dao Bums+
  • 1505 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 05 January 2017 - 10:14 AM

My opinion hasn't changed.  More threads should be sent to The Pit instead of "Off Topic" and we should be allowed to start threads in The Pit.

 

However, I agree, the root tenants of the forum must be complied with.  (No threats or inspiring violence and no personal attacks.)

 

Would you like to moderate the Pit or would you be among the Pit's moderated? :D :D :D


Edited by bubbles, 05 January 2017 - 10:14 AM.

  • dawei and Yueya said thanks for this
bubbles

Walk your talk or close your mouth.
Don't whine, just do your best.
Chi Kung for health : Flying Phoenix Celestial Healing Chi Kung of Ehrmeishan

#11 Marblehead

Marblehead

    The Wondering Taoist

  • Steward+
  • Pip
  • 36172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida, USA
  • Interests:Short Skirts and Bikinis

Posted 05 January 2017 - 10:22 AM

Would you like to moderate the Pit or would you be among the Pit's moderated? :D :D :D

 

Thanks for the offer.  My Anarchist mentality would likely prevent me from doing a good job at that.  I have enough challenges being the Welcome Master.


Edited by Marblehead, 05 January 2017 - 03:08 PM.

  • cheya, zerostao, dawei and 2 others said thanks

I reserve the right to be wrong.

YIN-YANG.jpg I reserve the right to change my mind. Anarchy4.jpg



Peace & Contentment!


#12 thelerner

thelerner

    Been here long enough to know better

  • Concierge
  • Pip
  • 9772 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:chicago
  • Interests:Getting Closer to Fine
    W/out going too Crazy

Posted 05 January 2017 - 01:53 PM

There are racists who crave attention and would use this board as there soap box.  This board was NOT meant to give them space.

 

These racists quickly jump from issues, that should and could be discussed, to why entire races, religions, colors, identity are bad and evil.   There are lots of neo nazi, Klan and White Power sites that cater to crazies on the far right, and websites that cater to delusional bigots on the far left. 

 

Everybody vents, everybody has issues and hot buttons, but when we see a pattern of an individual insulting and degrading entire ethnic groups, I think we should give them fair warning and send them packing.  Cause that is not what the Dao Bums is about.   I'll give people a pass or two, after that let them wallow in there hate, fear and prejudices somewhere else. 


  • liminal_luke, cheya, Marblehead and 3 others said thanks
Push hard to get better, become smarter, grow your devotion to the truth, fuel your commitment to beauty, refine your emotional intelligence, hone your dreams, negotiate with your shadow, cure your ignorance, shed your pettiness, heighten your drive to look for the best in people, and soften your heart. A creed from Pronoia

Where we have stopped dancing, singing, being enchanted by stories, or finding comfort in silence is where we have experience the loss of soul. Dancing, singing, storytelling, and silence are the four universal healing salves. ~ Gabrielle Roth

#13 Sionnach

Sionnach

    ясный

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 605 posts
  • Gender:None Selected

Posted 05 January 2017 - 07:42 PM

I offer to moderate the Primordial Chaos
 

Hades, God of the Underworld :P

Lucifer fallen in his rebellion

I feel the fox has some significance between worlds

In a world upside down


 


Edited by Sionnach, 05 January 2017 - 07:57 PM.

8d4cb69.jpg

"Taoism: It's most direct and universal functions for people in the ordinary world are the recognition of natural laws, promotion of health, prevention of illness, prolongation of life, and the stimulation of the development of culture and civilization based on successful cooperation between humanity and nature, and between the individual and society as a whole." Opening the Dragon Gate


#14 Sionnach

Sionnach

    ясный

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 605 posts
  • Gender:None Selected

Posted 06 January 2017 - 12:11 AM

LET ME RULE OVER THE CHAOS!

:P hahahaha

a95476d0954ef71c514d2a834b675676.jpg


8d4cb69.jpg

"Taoism: It's most direct and universal functions for people in the ordinary world are the recognition of natural laws, promotion of health, prevention of illness, prolongation of life, and the stimulation of the development of culture and civilization based on successful cooperation between humanity and nature, and between the individual and society as a whole." Opening the Dragon Gate


#15 Marblehead

Marblehead

    The Wondering Taoist

  • Steward+
  • Pip
  • 36172 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Florida, USA
  • Interests:Short Skirts and Bikinis

Posted 06 January 2017 - 03:55 AM

LET ME RULE OVER THE CHAOS!

:P hahahaha
 

Never.  You have too many fixed opinions.


  • liminal_luke, Sionnach and Kar3n said thanks for this

I reserve the right to be wrong.

YIN-YANG.jpg I reserve the right to change my mind. Anarchy4.jpg



Peace & Contentment!


#16 Stosh

Stosh

    ¿

  • The Dao Bums
  • Pip
  • 5234 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 January 2017 - 04:09 AM

Ironically, hate fear and predjudice, are the reasons to judge pre-empt and exclude people for their ideas. In america the ideal is of free speech, and liberty, so long as its not interfering with the liberty of others. As soon as one decides how they want everyone else to act and speak, it is they who become the antagonists of free participation.
Taobums presumably wants participation , and the idea is that , in allowing hostility , the participation drops because folks become threatened or disaffected. That makes sense to me as well, BUT, when the establishment decides to aggressively promote subdued behavior, they themselves have taken on the role of threatening and disaffecting the very public it wants to have participate.
Taking on this role, taobums increases its own need to control everyone, its own burden is magnified. Thats why daoist opinionsuggests that leadership should choose to set liberal unrestrictive policy, include all under a tolerant standard and leave the public to flexibly respond to extraordinary issues.
I wasnt here in the early days,I hear it worked fine back then, but membership was smaller, and perhaps that makes a difference,
  • dawei and Sionnach said thanks for this




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users