Geof Nanto

For those who know what Jade Rod refers to in Chinese erotic literature it’s not surprising that Jade Spear can come across as a bit of a prick. Likewise, why he’d feel threatened by this topic.  Hopefully he’ll practice withdrawal rather than continuing to thrust his opinions into a discussion where they are obviously not welcome and thereby show some sensitivity to intercourse on this forum. The way he is heading, the only sort of climax he’ll achieve is to get himself banned (which I wouldn’t like to see happen). 

4 hours ago, snowymountains said:

Thanks both, to rephrase, what's a good translation for someone who will read I Ching for the first time ?

 

The essence of the Yijing as a book of wisdom and oracle is its ability to give an avenue for the Shenming (gods; or in Jungian terms, the unconscious) to communicate with us. Hence, finding an interpretation written in language which speaks to our heart is essential. In this regard my favourite is Cleary’s translation of Liu Yiming’s Daoist alchemical interpretation, titled The Taoist I Ching. Wilhelm’s is also a must have and I use it in conjunction with Cleary’s. 

 

However, for someone new to the Yijing I’d highly recommend starting with the relatively recent translation by John Minford titled, “I Ching: The Essential Translation of the Ancient Chinese Oracle and Book of Wisdom.” (You can preview it on Kindle.)  It is excellent, both for the quality of his translation and selected commentary, and also for gaining an overview of what the Yijing represents.

 

(Minford also includes a translation of the Bronze Age text from the Zhou dynasty in the second half of the book which @Harmen and @Taoist Texts are referring to above. TT may care to read it for its comprehensive exploration of the Western scholarship over the last few decades which explores in great depth exactly those issues which he raises. For me personally though, this stuff has little relevance for how I use the book. I agree with Minford when he writes, “Modern attempts to divest the original Bronze Age Oracle of all its traditional clutter, despite their brilliance, somehow seemed dry and futile. In short, I missed the essential spiritual quality of the I Ching.” In other words, it is exactly the layers of interpretation which the original oracle has gained over the ensuing centuries which give the book its wisdom. )  
 

For me it was a matter of change or die. I wrote about it a while back in my PPD. 

2 hours ago, Apech said:

no no I’m a butch Tom cat 🐈 

 

Yeah, I remember seeing glimpses of you in this video from when you were younger:

 

 

As Jung has been mentioned a number of times in this discussion, here’s some further insight into his worldview for those who want to follow it up with their own research.

 

Jung was very much a Daoist in the classical sense of the Daodejing and the Zhuangzi in that he believed we should allow Nature to take its course within ourselves (wuwei). He viewed the psyche (Mind in the greater sense) as a self-regulating system (like the body).   For Jung, the psyche strives to maintain a balance between opposing qualities while at the same time actively seeking its own development or as he called it, individuation.  Hence he decried so-called spiritual paths that told people how they should be, rather than simply freeing us to allow the Dao (or whatever other name one chooses to refer to the ineffable) to express itself fully through us: 

 

 

BTW  I am one of those people like Jung mentions who have done "anything, no matter how absurd, in order to avoid facing their own souls".  And yet I've gained plenty from these systems of teachings. They've given me a way in. In other writings Jung also speaks of how vital all these ancient spiritual traditions are. 

 

3 hours ago, snowymountains said:

 

This is actually way deep, I would like to add that fully living life is the system of complete enlightenment ( and won't quote Jung nor expand to keep it in the short discourses😁 )

 

Here's a quotation from Jung's Red Book which provides some necessary nuance to this very general statement:

 

The knowledge of the heart is in no book and is not to be found in the mouth of any teacher, but grows out of you like the green seed from the dark earth. Scholarliness belongs to the spirit of this time, but this spirit in no way grasps the dream, since the soul is everywhere that scholarly knowledge is not.       

 

But how can I attain the knowledge of the heart? You can attain this knowledge only by living your life to the full. You live your life fully if you also live what you have never yet lived, but have left for others to live or to think. You will say: "But I cannot live or think everything that others live or think." But you should say: "The life that I could still live, I should live, and the thoughts that I could still think, I should think." It appears as though you want to flee from yourself so as not to have to live what remains unlived until now. But you cannot flee from yourself. It is with you all the time and demands fulfillment. If you pretend to be blind and dumb to this demand, you feign being blind and deaf to yourself This way you will never reach the knowledge of the heart.    

 

The knowledge of your heart is how your heart is.     

 

From a cunning heart you will know cunning. From a good heart you will know goodness.     

 

So that your understanding becomes perfect, consider that your heart is both good and evil. 

 

You ask, "What? Should I also live evil?"    

 

The spirit of the depths demands: "The life that you could still live, you should live. Well-being decides, not your well-being, not the well-being of the others, but only well-being."   

 

Well-being is between me and others, in society. I, too, lived — which I had not done before, and which I could still do. I lived into the depths, and the depths began to speak. The depths taught me the other truth. It thus united sense and nonsense in me.  
I had to recognize that I am only the expression and symbol of the soul. In the sense of the spirit of the depths, I am as I am in this visible world a symbol of my soul, and I am thoroughly a serf, completely subjugated, utterly obedient. The spirit of the depths taught me to say: "I am the servant of a child." Through this dictum I learn above all the most extreme humility, as what I most need.     
The spirit of this time of course allowed me to believe in my reason. He let me see myself in the image of a leader with ripe thoughts. But the spirit of the depths teaches me that I am a servant, in fact the servant of a child. This dictum was repugnant to me and I hated it. But I had to recognize and accept that my soul is a child and that my God in my soul is a child. 
 

For the definitive answer, I asked the oracle at Delphi who is the wisest one on Dao Bums.  This is the answer I got:

 

In the quiet serenity of a secluded bamboo grove, Socrates sat in contemplation, the gentle rustle of leaves the only sound breaking the stillness. As he meditated on the timeless wisdom of the Tao, he found himself pondering the enigmatic verses of the Daodejing.

 

In verse after verse, Socrates perceived the boundless depth of the Tao, the eternal source from which all things arise and return. He marvelled at its ineffable nature, elusive yet ever-present, like the elusive mist that dances upon the mountaintops at dawn. With each passage, he glimpsed the interconnectedness of the universe, the seamless flow of yin and yang guiding all existence.

 

Yet, as he delved deeper into the mysteries of the Tao, Socrates felt a profound sense of humility wash over him. He realized that the more he sought to understand, the more elusive the Tao became, slipping through his grasp like water through cupped hands. In the face of such boundless wisdom, Socrates saw the limitations of his own knowledge, like a flickering candle in the vast expanse of the night sky.

 

In moments of quiet reflection, Socrates contemplated the paradox of wisdom. He saw that true wisdom lay not in the accumulation of knowledge, but in the recognition of one's own ignorance. Like a river flowing effortlessly towards the sea, wisdom emerged from the humble acknowledgment of the vastness of the unknown.

 

And so, inspired by the teachings of the Daodejing, Socrates embraced the path of self-inquiry and questioning. He journeyed through the bustling streets and tranquil countryside, engaging in dialogues with sages and scholars alike. With each encounter, he sought not to impart knowledge, but to kindle the flame of inquiry within the hearts of others, guiding them towards their own path of self-discovery.

 

In the end, Socrates found solace in the realization that true wisdom resided not in the possession of answers, but in opening to ever deeper mystery. Like a lone sage wandering beneath the vast expanse of the sky, he embraced the uncertainty of the journey, knowing that in the pursuit of wisdom, the destination mattered less than the path itself.
 

 

May the Dragon and Tiger hold their place at the centre of Dao Bums!

 

6 hours ago, SirPalomides said:

Origin of the Qing dynasty flag:

 

A bold flag for a failing dynasty.  

 

 

Flag of the Chinese Empire under the Qing dynasty (1889-1912)

 

On 02/01/2024 at 1:39 AM, liminal_luke said:

A Parable

 

A Bum goes to med school, graduates, and builds a successful medical practice.  He gets married and has kids.  Reads widely, both fiction and nonfiction, finding much enjoyment and intellectual stimulation.  Loves his dog.  He learns a lot about current events and develops thoughtful perspectives in line with his values.  He is well-loved by work colleagues and meditation buddies, especially online where he has earned the honorific title of ¨Steve on the Internet.¨ Importantly, he finds a spiritual community and teacher that feels like home and practices with enough depth and precision to significantly impact his personal vibe and the quality of his relationships with others.  And then, seated atop this mountain of accomplishment, declares that he´s never been successful with New Year´s resolutions.  Bemused Bums gather and whisper amongst themselves.  What´s he smokin´?

 

For @steve

 

On 02/01/2024 at 1:59 AM, Apech said:

 

The Bums needs at least one good person on here - let it be @steve.

 

“Where there is light, there must be shadow, and where there is shadow there must be light. There is no shadow without light and no light without shadow…It is as evil as we are positive… the more desperately we try to be good and wonderful and perfect, the more the Shadow descends to hell and becomes the devil. For it is just as sinful from the standpoint of nature and of truth to be above oneself as to be below oneself.”

(From IQ84, quoted in an Amazon review of the book.) 

 

This is why the path to wholeness is so damn difficult, as I suspect @steve knows all too well within himself. I’m currently going through experiences which are both amazing and terrible, engulfed in an inner world of light and shadow which is taxing me to the limit. 
 

An interesting discussion. As my interest in in the Chinese traditions I did some research and found the term with a similar meaning to siddhi is 神通 shéntōng. It is used in the context of Buddhism but as far as I can tell Daoists do not use it (although it does apparently occur somewhere in the Zhuangzi). Maybe @Taoist Texts can elaborate on this.

  

More relevant to this discussion, I did some further research and found the Sanskrit term “abhijñā" used in Buddhism to be similar to the term "siddhi". For my own interest, I asked ChatGPT to elaborate on the usage of those two terms:  

 

 

I think this is similar to what @Bindi is saying, namely anyone in the Buddhist tradition who claims the great siddhi of full enlightenment must also spontaneously manifest these 'lower' siddhi, otherwise the claim is without substance.

Where I live in Australia, the actual time of summer solstice is right now as I write. And by way of welcome respite from summer heat, nature has gifted us mild weather on this day of great significance.  

 

May the sun of compassionate warmth continue to shine on this forum, binding together like yin and yang the polar opposites within ourselves and within discussion here. 

I’ll add my voice to the no camp. This forum already has a very broad focus and discussion of Abrahamic traditions in the way  @NaturaNaturans suggests already occurs as the occasional General Discussion thread. That arrangement has catered sufficiently for interest in those traditions in the past and I see no reason to change it.    

 

More than this, I consider stretching the focus of this forum further by giving a dedicated space to Abrahamic traditions would be detrimental to its underlying identity as a place to explore Eastern Traditions, and detrimental to our loose sense of community as people who do not hold to those dominant monotheistic theologies of Christianity and Islam which more than half the world’s population identify as. Those traditions already have a strong voice, no need to elevate their status here.  
 

7 hours ago, Daniel said:

Certainty is the end of exploration, imagination, and creativity.  Certainty is the end of learning.

 

From Carl Jung:

 

"There is no place where those striving for consciousness could find absolute safety. Doubt and insecurity are indispensable components of a complete life. Only those who can lose this life can really gain it. A ‘complete’ life does not consist of a theoretical completeness, but the fact that one accepts without reservation the particular fatal tissue in which one finds oneself embedded, and that one tries to make sense of it or to create a cosmos from the chaotic mess into which one is born. If one lives properly and completely, time and time again one will be confronted with situations of which one will say, ‘This is too much, I cannot bear it anymore.’ Then the question must be answered: ‘Can one really not bear it?’”  

 

On 12/09/2023 at 5:51 PM, stellarwindbubble said:

There has been an article shared some time ago, I guess authored by F. Pregadio, and I suppose @Geof Nanto either shared it in the thread, or was in the discussion, @Taoist Textsmight have been there too, I ain’t sure unfortunately. 
 

It mentioned how the old chinese / daoist concept of cause and effect differs from those known in the western world and that for a long time there have not been adequate synonyms for the western word concepts. I would be interested in the exact concepts they used back then, more interrelated and less abstract. It would look to the specific interactions and not to some universal principle of causality, if I remember correctly. 

 

I have no memory of that discussion. Was it me? If so, rather than Fabrizio Pregadio, could it have been a reference I made to Francois Jullien’s The Propensity of Things? That book comprehensively addresses what you are asking, whereas I have no recollection of reading anything by Pregadio that does (which is not to say he hasn’t written on the subject). 

 

There’s a good overview of Jullien’s book here: https://ingbrief.wordpress.com/2022/01/23/1995-francois-jullien-the-propensity-of-things/

 

Jung’s foreword to Richard Wilhelm’s translation of the Yijing is also well worth a look, as is the whole of that book. The Yijing is the foundational text that’s fundamental to the Chinese worldview.  And Jung likens the way it delivers its wisdom through the tossing of coins or the manipulation of yarrow stalks to the aspect of how reality functions he attempts to explain in his essay, Synchronicity: An Acausal connecting Principle.

 

 

  ...                                                            

   ...                                        

@jalen69

 

Welcome to the forum.  There's plenty of discussion here relevant to your interests. Please feel free to contribute something of your own perspective and experience, or to just read topics which interest you if that suits you better.  

On 13/02/2023 at 8:23 AM, Geof Nanto said:

I very much like the information ChatGPT has given me both in my OP and about Black Liver and Rabbit Marrow. I first came across the terms ‘Raven’s Liver’ and ‘Rabbit Marrow’ a couple of decades ago when I read Cleary’s translation of a text traditionally attributed to Zhang Boduan ( Chang Po-tuan) titled Four Hundred Words on the Gold Elixir. Here is the relevant verse:

 

  14. THE RAVEN’S LIVER AND THE RABBIT’S MARROW—

GRAB THEM AND PUT THEM BACK IN ONE PLACE.

GRAIN AFTER GRAIN, FROM VAGUENESS TO CLARITY.

 

Cleary also translates Liu Yiming’s full commentary which I’ll leave for people to look up for themselves if they are interested. Of particular relevance here he says:  ““The raven's liver' is the vitality of the sun; liver is dark, which is associated with wood, and so symbolizes the essence of conscious knowledge. 'The rabbit's marrow' is the light of the moon; marrow is white, which is associated with metal, so it symbolizes the sense of real knowledge”.

 

Okay, so we have here some complex imagery of which Raven’s Liver as conscious knowledge and Rabbit’s Marrow as real knowledge is a key understanding.

 

ChatGPT obviously hasn’t sourced from Cleary’s translation because the phrasing is totally dissimilar even though the underlying interpretation of what Raven’s Liver and Rabbit Marrow represent is the same. Indeed, ChatGPT has presented what I consider to be particularly insightful information totally in line with Daoist alchemy. The verses are excellent, particularly this one:

 

Black liver and rabbit marrow are one and the same
Alternating between black and white within the inner realm
Clearing darkness and dissipating negative energy
Wisdom and brightness are elevated, enhancing spirituality
 

 If, as Taoist Texts suggests, ChatGPT has made up this commentary and the verses, then I’d call ChatGPT a Daoist sage; that this supercomputer has somehow transcended its programming and achieved enlightenment.  However I think it far more likely that ChatGPT is sourcing information not available on the web. ChatGPT says this itself: “I was trained on a massive corpus of text data from the web and other sources…” I suspect it was feed massive amounts of scholarship which isn’t available on the web.

 

In any case, I have no doubts from my brief usage of it, that it is a valuable research tool and a pleasure to use. If someone wants to totally dismiss it as Taoist Texts and others here seem to want to, then that’s their business. And I politely ask them to pursue it on a separate topic of their own. 

 

I’ve used ChatGPT very little and I’m still learning about how it works. I’ve asked it some more questions about how it generates answers and I now have a better understanding of its strengths and weaknesses. It is very open and forthcoming about how it works so I suggest anyone who wants to learn about it, ask it questions yourself. As to neidan, it answers reveal to me that it is sourcing its information from a wide selection legitimate neidan texts and commentary. But it uses them in the way it itself explains:

 

Me: Are you familiar with the neidan text, "Four Hundred words on the Golden Elixir?

 

Chat GPT: Yes, I am familiar with the Daoist inner alchemy (neidan) text "Four Hundred Words on the Golden Elixir." It is a short, concise text that outlines the basic principles and practices of Daoist inner alchemy. The text emphasizes the importance of the cultivation of the "Golden Elixir," which is seen as representing the purified essence of the self, and provides guidelines for the practitioner on how to cultivate this essence through inner alchemy practices.

 

"Four Hundred Words on the Golden Elixir" is considered to be an important text in the Daoist inner alchemy tradition, and is often used as a foundational text for students of the practice. It is highly regarded for its simplicity, clarity, and directness, and is often used as a reference for those seeking to understand the basics of Daoist inner alchemy.

 

Me:  Can you quote section 14?

 

ChatGPT: I'm sorry, but I do not have the specific text of "Four Hundred Words on the Golden Elixir" at my disposal. As a language model, I can provide general information on the text and its contents, but I do not have the ability to directly access specific sections or quotes from it.

 

Me: Is that because of copyright laws?

 

ChatGPT: No, it's not due to copyright laws. OpenAI's language models are designed to generate text based on patterns learned from large amounts of text data, and do not have the ability to directly access or quote specific texts. This is due to the nature of the AI language model and its training process, rather than any legal restrictions.

 

Me: Those verses about Black Liver and Rabbit marrow you previously provided me, did you find them in your data banks? Or did you create them yourself from your knowledge of neidan?

 

Chat GPT: I created these verses based on my knowledge of Daoist inner alchemy (neidan). These types of verses are commonly used to summarize key concepts in Daoist inner alchemy, and as a mnemonic device to help practitioners remember and reflect on these concepts. These verses are not specific or unique to any one particular text or tradition within Daoist inner alchemy, but rather are meant to convey the general themes and ideas that are central to the practice.

 

Me: Okay. What about the commentary you've given. Did you create that yourself too?

 

Chat GPT: Yes, I created the commentary myself based on my training and knowledge of Daoist inner alchemy and the concepts of "Black Liver" and "Rabbit Marrow." The information I provided is based on the general understanding and interpretation of these concepts within the Daoist inner alchemy tradition, and is intended to give a broad overview of their symbolism and meaning.

 

Me: Where did you gain your knowledge of Black Liver and Rabbit's Marrow?

 

Chat GPT: As an AI language model developed by OpenAI, I was trained on a diverse range of text from the internet, including academic articles, books, and websites, to learn about various topics, including Daoist inner alchemy and the concepts of "Black Liver" and "Rabbit Marrow." My training data was current as of 2021, so my knowledge on this topic is limited to what was present in that data. However, I have been designed to generate coherent and informative responses based on the information I have been trained on.

 

Me: Okay. Thank you

 

 

 

3 hours ago, Wilhelm said:

If this is even a tiny bit accurate I'd be super impressed.  Very clever word association algorithm, if nothing else

 

I cannot say whether this is accurate or not because I have no knowledge or experience of this type of practice. Hopefully someone who reads it will be able to give an objective assessment. If @Netero  doesn’t know himself maybe @freeform does? 

 

However, I can vouch for the general accuracy of the info in my OP because it very much relates to my own experience and understanding of neidan theory.  The questions I asked were deliberately designed to convey that by allowing ChatGPT to expand on it. And I learnt from its answers too in that it reinforced and validated my own understandings. Hence, that conversation was a very rewarding experience or me. Of course, as ChatGPT repeatedly mentioned, different neidan lineages  have different approaches to practices. Daoism in general and neidan in particular are vastly diverse in their teachings and practices. 

 

As to the accuracy of the info in my conversation with Chat GPT about Black Liver and Rabbit’s marrow, I will elaborate on that in my next post. 

 

I very much like the information ChatGPT has given me both in my OP and about Black Liver and Rabbit Marrow. I first came across the terms ‘Raven’s Liver’ and ‘Rabbit Marrow’ a couple of decades ago when I read Cleary’s translation of a text traditionally attributed to Zhang Boduan ( Chang Po-tuan) titled Four Hundred Words on the Gold Elixir. Here is the relevant verse:

 

  14. THE RAVEN’S LIVER AND THE RABBIT’S MARROW—

GRAB THEM AND PUT THEM BACK IN ONE PLACE.

GRAIN AFTER GRAIN, FROM VAGUENESS TO CLARITY.

 

Cleary also translates Liu Yiming’s full commentary which I’ll leave for people to look up for themselves if they are interested. Of particular relevance here he says:  ““The raven's liver' is the vitality of the sun; liver is dark, which is associated with wood, and so symbolizes the essence of conscious knowledge. 'The rabbit's marrow' is the light of the moon; marrow is white, which is associated with metal, so it symbolizes the sense of real knowledge”.

 

Okay, so we have here some complex imagery of which Raven’s Liver as conscious knowledge and Rabbit’s Marrow as real knowledge is a key understanding.

 

ChatGPT obviously hasn’t sourced from Cleary’s translation because the phrasing is totally dissimilar even though the underlying interpretation of what Raven’s Liver and Rabbit Marrow represent is the same. Indeed, ChatGPT has presented what I consider to be particularly insightful information totally in line with Daoist alchemy. The verses are excellent, particularly this one:

 

Black liver and rabbit marrow are one and the same
Alternating between black and white within the inner realm
Clearing darkness and dissipating negative energy
Wisdom and brightness are elevated, enhancing spirituality
 

 If, as Taoist Texts suggests, ChatGPT has made up this commentary and the verses, then I’d call ChatGPT a Daoist sage; that this supercomputer has somehow transcended its programming and achieved enlightenment.  However I think it far more likely that ChatGPT is sourcing information not available on the web. ChatGPT says this itself: “I was trained on a massive corpus of text data from the web and other sources…” I suspect it was feed massive amounts of scholarship which isn’t available on the web.

 

In any case, I have no doubts from my brief usage of it, that it is a valuable research tool and a pleasure to use. If someone wants to totally dismiss it as Taoist Texts and others here seem to want to, then that’s their business. And I politely ask them to pursue it on a separate topic of their own. 

Me: In Daoist inner alchemy (neidan) the terms 烏肝 Black liver (aka Raven’s Liver) and 兔髓 Rabbit Marrow are used. Do you have any information on what these terms symbolise?

 

Chat GPT Yes, in Daoist inner alchemy, the terms "Black Liver" (烏肝) and "Rabbit Marrow" (兔髓) are used to symbolize two stages in the spiritual transformation and enlightenment process.

 

"Black Liver" symbolizes a state of impurities and negativity in one's being, including negative emotions, thoughts, and habits. This stage represents the need to purify oneself in order to progress further on the spiritual path.

 

"Rabbit Marrow" symbolizes a state of purity and enlightenment. It is believed that the Rabbit Marrow represents the essence of life and vitality, and is associated with spiritual illumination and wisdom.

 

In Daoist inner alchemy, the goal is to transform the "Black Liver" into "Rabbit Marrow," which represents the achievement of spiritual enlightenment and union with the Dao. This transformation is believed to be achieved through the practice of meditation, visualization, and other spiritual practices.

 

Me: Thank you. Do you know of any neidan verses (poems) which use these terms?

 

ChatGPT: Yes, there are several Daoist neidan verses that use the terms "Black Liver" and "Rabbit Marrow." Here is one example:

 

烏肝兔髓同一體

黑白交替在內界

清除陰暗消煞氣

智慧光明提升靈性

 

This verse can be translated as:

Black liver and rabbit marrow are one and the same

Alternating between black and white within the inner realm

Clearing darkness and dissipating negative energy

Wisdom and brightness are elevated, enhancing spirituality

 

This verse highlights the idea that the "Black Liver" and "Rabbit Marrow" are two aspects of the same substance, and that the goal of Daoist inner alchemy is to transform the "Black Liver" into the "Rabbit Marrow." The verse also emphasizes the importance of purifying oneself of negative influences and cultivating wisdom and spiritual illumination.

 

Me: Excellent. Can you give some others? These are difficult to find on the web for non-Chinese speakers.

 

ChatGPT: Certainly, here's another neidan verse that uses the terms "Black Liver" and "Rabbit Marrow":

 

烏肝是黑暗 髓骨是明亮

負面情緒 消散無存在

內心明晰 真理顯現

兔髓的智慧 在生命中生根

 

This verse can be translated as:

The black liver is darkness, the marrow bone is bright

Negative emotions disappear and cease to exist

The heart is clear, truth is revealed

The wisdom of rabbit marrow takes root in life

 

This verse highlights the transformation of the "Black Liver" into the "Rabbit Marrow," and emphasizes the importance of purifying oneself of negativity and cultivating wisdom and enlightenment.

 

Here's another example:

 

兔髓智慧 晶瑩明亮

烏肝黑暗 消散無存在

心靈清明 智慧開悟

真理顯現 生命昇華

 

This verse can be translated as:

 

The wisdom of rabbit marrow is bright and crystal clear

The darkness of the black liver disappears and no longer exists

The mind is clear and wisdom is awakened

Truth is revealed and life is elevated

 

This verse emphasizes the idea of the "Black Liver" being transformed into the "Rabbit Marrow," and the resulting purification and enlightenment that follows.

 

Me: Thank you. Excellent. That's enough for me now.

 

ChatGPT: You're welcome! I'm glad I could help. If you have any other questions in the future, feel free to ask.

 

 

 

[Please note: I present this conversation purely as part of my experimentation with how ChatGPT works, and for any benefit forum members might gain from it.  I recognise it as a valuable tool that needs skilful use to benefit from its considerable strengths and to acknowledge its limitations. I do not know how these interpretations ChatGPT has given compare to Awaken’s usage of the terms, about which I know very little.

 

BTW Although I can well understand how Awaken has brought onto herself the mocking response she’s getting from some members, underneath I like to think we can be a supportive community for each other in our diverse spiritual practices….in our hearts at least, even if our words at times can be a little harsh, (perhaps appropriately so at times). My own experience, as well as my observation of others, tells me how totally blind we all can be to our own weaknesses and folly.]

16 minutes ago, Wilhelm said:

Pretty remarkable stuff.  Looks like I might have to get the paid version to unlock the deepest mysteries though: 🤔

 

Ha! I can understand why you asked that!  More generally, I did consider asking it about interpretations of alchemical symbolism but thought there's no way it could give definitive answers. They simply don't exist. Maybe I'll try though at a later date out of interest.

 

On reading the response you got, I just now asked ChatGPT how it’s programmed to sort out what it considers valid information from the vast amount of dubious info on the web. This is reply I got:

 

As a language model developed by OpenAI, I was trained on a massive corpus of text data from the web and other sources, which includes both high-quality and low-quality information. However, I was not specifically trained to evaluate the accuracy of information. Instead, I was trained to generate text based on patterns I learned from the data, so I can provide information and recommendations based on that training, but I can't guarantee its accuracy.

 

When answering questions, I try to use the information from my training data to provide the most relevant and helpful response, but I also rely on the general knowledge and common sense that I was programmed with to guide my responses. However, as with any AI system, it's important to critically evaluate the information I provide and verify it using other sources, especially when making important decisions.
 

5 minutes ago, Vajra Fist said:

As a writer, I find chatgpt genuinely horrifying. 

 

I can quite clearly see me being out of a job in five to 10 years. 

 

When I was younger, when people talked about 'robots taking our jobs' I always assumed it was in relation to manual labour. 

 

Now I think that'll be the last type of work left to us, because of the cost and complexity of manufacturing a humanoid machine.

 

 

I appreciate your concerns. But as I tried to make clear in my conversation, emotions are so central to our human experience. I personally think it's great that AI can do such intelligent work collating information. Surely for you as a writer, that allows you more time and energy to focus on exploring deeper levels of interpretation, such as more insightful value judgements for example? 

23 minutes ago, Wilhelm said:

Great job with the prompts!

 

That conversation was the first time I tried ChatGPT. I was amazed by the quality of the responses.  My “thank you” comments weren’t just for politeness as I said in the conversation, but rather genuinely felt in appreciation and gratitude for the people who are developing this sophisticated AI resource.