Don't worry be happy?

[stirling]

38 minutes ago, old3bob said:

I'd say thoughts about Spirit are constucts,  unconditoned pure and free Spirit is not...

The Great Tao can see the ten thousand but the ten thousand can not see the Tao through ten thousand layers.

(or something along those lines)

 

If it is unconditioned and pure, I think we agree. So, the Dao and "spirit" would be synonymous ?

[Nungali]

1 hour ago, justjoseph said:

You'll have to dumb it down for me Lairg

 

 

I will try to help here ... he is saying 'truth'  ( alone ) is  syncategorematic  . 

 

:)  

[justjoseph]

3 minutes ago, Nungali said:

 

 

I will try to help here ... he is saying 'truth'  ( alone ) is  syncategorematic  . 

 

Ah, i see. Is that true though ?

[Lairg]

1 hour ago, justjoseph said:

Is that true though ?

 

These days it seems common to vote on what is true.

 

If only we could do meta-physical experiments to test what is true to what.

 

[Tommy]

7 hours ago, justjoseph said:

It depends on what truth you're talking about. Absolute truth is not decided upon, it is there regardless of you. Subjective truth is true for you but not necessarily for others, but it is not decided upon by you otherwise it couldn't be true. 

I haven't denied anyone's belief, not sure why you said that. 

I never said anything about white light coming out of people. 

My first comments to lairg were intended to address the problems i felt were with his approach, in no way was i denying his beliefs or methods.  

Sorry, but you put into question his method of validating his truth. That seemed to me that you denied his beliefs. I am probably wrong that you meant it that way. My apologies. His approach seemed logical? When in doubt to see if others see the same things??

[old3bob]

4 hours ago, stirling said:

 

If it is unconditioned and pure, I think we agree. So, the Dao and "spirit" would be synonymous ?

 

I'm not a Taoist so I can't really  say so for its doctrines or various schools,  yet i do paraphrase parts of it according to my limited understanding and what correlates to me...

 

Btw, we also have some points that are not easy to integrate imo, like how can there be what some folks call "impersonal enlightenment" when persons and compassion are involved which is personal...

[justjoseph]

7 hours ago, Lairg said:

 

These days it seems common to vote on what is true.

 

If only we could do meta-physical experiments to test what is true to what.

 

The problem is Lairg, you expect others have the same capabilities as you. You ask things of others like "see where the white light goes" or "go back on the timeline" not realising that just because you can do these meta-physical experiments doesn't mean everyone else can, so your method becomes less like a helpful person saying things and more like a guy just saying odd things. 

[Lairg]

Surely some Daoists can do metaphysical work

[justjoseph]

5 hours ago, Tommy said:

Sorry, but you put into question his method of validating his truth. That seemed to me that you denied his beliefs. I am probably wrong that you meant it that way. My apologies. His approach seemed logical? When in doubt to see if others see the same things??

I gave what i think to be reasonable criticisms of his approach. Denying his belief would be different i think.
I believe that Lairg believes what he's saying.
Thank you for apologising, no worries , i could probably have been clearer myself.
Yes, seemed logical, but i thought there were issues with it, as if he has another person like himself then he would get an echo chamber.

@Lairg
Surely.

Edited 5 hours ago by justjoseph

[Bindi]

10 hours ago, stirling said:

 

The story you tell about how reality is. Religion, philosophy, scientific theories, myths, systems, etc. 

 

Throwing away scientific ‘stories’ Is not necessarily wise. The Dalai Lama, a fairly respected Buddhist, is quite interested in science - 

 

Quote

Not only have I sought to grasp specific scientific ideas but have also attempted to explore the wider implications of the new advances in human knowledge and technological power brought about through science. The specific areas of science I have explored most over the years are subatomic physics, cosmology, biology and psychology.

Tenzin Gyatso, the Dalai Lama https://www.dalailama.com/messages/buddhism/science-at-the-crossroads

 

I think reality is more interesting and more nuanced than just letting all stories go.

[Bindi]

1 hour ago, justjoseph said:

The problem is Lairg, you expect others have the same capabilities as you. You ask things of others like "see where the white light goes" or "go back on the timeline" not realising that just because you can do these meta-physical experiments doesn't mean everyone else can, so your method becomes less like a helpful person saying things and more like a guy just saying odd things. 

You take a leap of faith assuming that Laitg himself has the capabilities he claims. Put a claim to the test, the classic is ‘appear in my lounge room’ for people who claim special talents. But other tests might be better. Why would anyone just believe a claim without it being substantiated, unless you’re buying a bridge for sale? 

[old3bob]

10 hours ago, Nungali said:

 

I will try to help here ... he is saying 'truth'  ( alone ) is  syncategorematic . 

 

never thought this post would also have so many legs or words like "syncategorematic" which I'm still not all that clear about even after looking it up...  ;-)

 

 

Edited 3 hours ago by old3bob

[Lairg]

1 hour ago, Bindi said:

You take a leap of faith assuming that Laitg himself has the capabilities he claims.

 

I was hoping someone would try one of the experiments I suggested

[Bindi]

1 hour ago, Lairg said:

 

I was hoping someone would try one of the experiments I suggested

what are some of these experiments?