Recommended Posts

At some point, a reflective person might ask why he or she believed some particular detail was self-evident in the first place.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They might, and then someone could ask, What do you expect as proof ? ( either way)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Both are good questions when internalized, don't you think?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I dunno, Brian, should one doubt that things exist , and so remain open? or would the same leave one closed ,,

essentially would one prefer to see the world as a place they are in ,

or would they want to be in a world where theres nowhere to go, or that they could depend on nothing?

 

Theres that analogy about the newspaper print , which goes that if one looks close all there are is dots , yes on one scale they comprise the story, but on this other scale the story is ,gone. Looking at a human , then go closer eventually you get down to a cellular level , and are thses parts alive? and then you go smaller still, are these quarks or waves of energy really what we are? .. its an issue of scale , we live on the scale of humans, experience the world with human senses, human minds,, the fabric of the universe is whatever the hell it is, but in a daily sense I just want my coffee and bagel. :)

Edited by Stosh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At some point, a reflective person might ask why he or she believed some particular detail was self-evident in the first place.

 

 

This is assuming that the person in question has done some growing.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

This is assuming that the person in question has done some growing.

Oh, I totally agree! That's why I put two layers of qualifiers on that sentence, but it was definitely worth calling out.

 

:)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites