-
Content count
1,485 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
About Antares
- Currently Viewing Topic: What do you think about Neidan(內丹)?
-
Rank
Dao Bum
Recent Profile Visitors
9,339 profile views
-
Yin Yang imbalance, excessive fire in heart/liver, yuan jing dispersion, madness, also one can get very dumb if does sitting meditations too much without correct moving exercises, also blocks in some channels may occur and entities possession/attack I heard about a guy who did correct methods but went mad Another guy did correct methods and had Hindu got visitation who said to him to visit Sai Baba in India and he went there and quit Daoist practice
-
yeah, one can make 20 jokes or just write some short posts with few phrases and then troll the sub-forum discussion it where we are now
-
It is bcoz neidan methods differ, sometime greatly - in some sects there is more emphasis on Xing, in some on Ming so there can be a confusion of ideas. But people who practice same sects methods can come to constructive discussions. I think in most cases it will be Longmen northern methods discussions
-
And where are we now?
-
Nei-gong means "internal work" and implies many things including internal and more external work. But some nei-gong systems are miore advanced than more "simple" neidan systems.
-
It depends if there will be good administration so that qigong or people with esoteric mind - set can't come there and ruin it with their musings and ideas. They can bring forward original texts but interpret it the way they like it. So the discussion will be ruined anyway I am afraid
-
Not sure what you mean by "channel" in this context. The main method of 炼已 there is https://all-dao.com/jiuyangshengong.html Also there are few more additional dynamic heart - mind purification methods and some static ones. One of them works on yuan jing restoration. What I can say there is NO any breath methods and no much stress on seated one in the beginning. Also there are southern and northern methods in 伍柳派. I only tried to practice northern one for short period of time I did not practice it much and was not initiated into this school so can't say much about it
-
All events on Earth do not happen by chance, including economic and political events. Everything occurs by the will of the Heaven and has its own plan for development and transformation. My thoughts were specifically about this aspect of recent events, and it was a continuation of the thread. The world will not remain the same, whether someone likes it or not
-
I hope this is not from qigong book. I think mods should change the title of the thread. The new title should be smth like "My thoughts on qigong cultivation" Otherwise it looks like trolling
-
I just disagree. Not going to argue with you. If you can invent your own Ming methods then partially I would agree with you. But I don't know anyone who has invented it. Oh, sorry, my fault, we have one here. Anyone one else? Even CD used taiji practice that was not invented by him
-
That one has/had a teacher The "Nine Immortals" typically refers to legendary figures in Chinese lore, often associated with embodying virtues like love, courage, compassion, and knowledge, serving powerful deities or emperors, or appearing in fantasy settings as powerful cultivators in sects like the Nine Immortals Peak Sect or Nine Immortals Palace, distinct from the more famous Eight Immortals but representing divine agents or aspirational beings
-
It depends on sect but from what i know - In the West, northern schools have become widespread, where the main emphasis is on Xing, and Ming, if cultivated at all, is done so to a lesser extent in the initial stages of practice. Ideally, there should be a precise 50/50 balance, otherwise there is a significant risk of deviations. In very rare systems, such a correct ratio of cultivation methods for Xing and Ming exists
-
These 2 are also in neigong. But not all neigong systems are good enough. Where else should it be? As for how to know if it is correct - read school/sect texts and check how it correlates with your practice If it does not - you do smth else but not nei...
-
Yeah, Daoist texts have no merit but ChiDragon' understanding that he has got through AI has it. It does not exist, Daoist made it up. You just have to be "real man" that means: you should be well-read, smart, able to communicate with AI, have biceps, English boots, and you also need to help grandmothers cross the street.
-
This case is about basic psychology. In Daoism, nothing serious can be achieved without a teacher. That’s a law. But there are people who want to deceive the Dao and themselves. I have read on this forum that some people believe it's possible to achieve 'transmission of knowledge' directly from the Dao and that a teacher is not necessary. This approach is dangerous both for those who believe in this concept and for others to whom they spread these ideas. This is another reason why no one will widely share their practice and knowledge — these people will start inventing their own methods, achieving 'significant' results as they see it, and then teaching others while also making money from it. Such cases have happened more than once. ChiDragon is trying to convince himself that he is doing everything right, he doesn't need the opinions of others. He is here to teach. The outcome of such an approach leads to deviations that become increasingly difficult to correct over time, and in some cases some people can descend into madness. They no longer understand what is happening to them
