Debunking a Creator

[gatito]

Ralis, summarize your points in 2 sentences will you.

 

I'll summarise this whole thread in two sentences if you like - but I bet you anything that you don't understand them

[RongzomFan]

I have been stating my position. Read my posts.

 

Ok you railed against transmission, as usual.

 

I said the rules were divine.

 

What else?

[ralis]

This thread is most amusing given that when Buddhist ideology/belief systems are challenged, chaos ensues.

[gatito]

Does this apply to you when you try to propagate NeoAdvaita on the Buddhist sub-forum?

 

As I've said, I've never tried to propogate neoadvaita on the Buddhist sub-forum

[RongzomFan]

I'll summarise this whole thread in two sentences if you like - but I bet you anything that you don't understand them

 

I probably won't.

 

Like when you insisted this was a reputable academic source:

 

http://www.advaita.org.uk/

[deci belle]

I wish somebody here would endeavor to see their original face for themselves so at least it would be clear (to them) that there is no such thing to debunk.

 

It is possible to ascertain for oneself that one's own mind has no beginning, is selfless and therefore is not subject to nor has ever been the object of anything, much less a creator.

 

Isn't off-topic a wonderful thing!!❤

[RongzomFan]

This thread is most amusing given that when Buddhist ideology/belief systems are challenged, chaos ensues.

 

You won't summarize your "challenges", because you know you didn't say anything substantive.

[RongzomFan]

Ralis, summarize your points in 2 sentences will you.

bump for a response

[ralis]

I think that they imagine that they're "earning merit" (or something like that)

 

I suppose ones that challenge wind up in a Buddhist 'hell realm'?

[Simple_Jack]

As I've said, I've never tried to propogate neoadvaita on the Buddhist sub-forum

 

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500405

[gatito]

I probably won't.

 

Like when you insisted this was a reputable academic source:

 

http://www.advaita.org.uk/

 

I think that I was rather more circumspect and subtle than that

[RongzomFan]

Ralis, summarize your points in 2 sentences will you.

[Simple_Jack]

This thread is most amusing given that when Buddhist ideology/belief systems are challenged, chaos ensues.

 

You didn't challenge anything except by the standards of e-prime.

[gatito]

http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500405

 

You prove my point and refute your own

 

Nice one

[RongzomFan]

I think that I was rather more circumspect and subtle than that

 

LMAO

 

I've provided a recognised academic source for the definition of "neoadvaita",

 

 

Edited December 6, 2013 by RongzomFan

[gatito]

I suppose ones that challenge wind up in a Buddhist 'hell realm'?

 

That's got to be better than here or the Buddhist sub-forum though

[Simple_Jack]

You prove my point and refute your own

 

Nice one

 

I know, but that does prove that you were proselytizing.

[RongzomFan]

Ralis, summarize your points in 2 sentences will you.

[RongzomFan]

You didn't challenge anything except by the standards of e-prime.

 

Exactly.

[Simple_Jack]

You didn't challenge anything except by the standards of e-prime.

 

Bump.

[gatito]

I know, but that does prove that you were proselytizing.

 

No you asked for information

[RongzomFan]

Ralis, summarize your points in 2 sentences will you.

 

bump

[Simple_Jack]

No you asked for information

 

No, I contrasted this http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500270, with this http://thetaobums.com/topic/32739-yidams-in-vajrayana/?p=500323

[RongzomFan]

This thread is most amusing given that when Buddhist ideology/belief systems are challenged, chaos ensues.

E-prime is not a challenge.

[Simple_Jack]

 

E-prime is not a challenge.

 

Exactly.