Shubin

古代丹经里没有讲自发功的。你知道为啥不讲么？自发功是从哪一年开始流行的，你知道么？ 你并不懂丹道，却自认为是教丹道的老师，四禅八定是道家的功夫么？ No ancient Daoism books mentioned any spontaneous gong。Do you know why？ In which year spontaneous gong was getting popular？Do you the answer? You know a little about Daoism, but believed that you can teach others. The four dhyanas and eight samadhis are belong to Daoism or Buddhism？

You are making some people laugh, and some cry.

There was no lions in ancient China, but there were tigers, and many unearthed cultural relics are found. For example, https://m.thepaper.cn/rss_newsDetail_16479829?from= and https://news.artron.net/20201222/n1046543.html and https://www.360kuai.com/pc/920414a03fbd9eba7?cota=3&kuai_so=1&sign=360_7bc3b157

It looks like that you might not understand this poem, or you did not take a look on your translation. In this poem, 周天 is about cycles, not a week or 7 days. 十月 is (taking at least) 10 mouths, not October. 運周天水火， Water and fire are transported in the week, 十月脫胎丹就， In October, the birth of the womb is completed,

It seems for me that DAO BUMS is not so good and not bad, too, but I do not understand why "道家学说" was put there, under "Discussions On the Way", because I could not find a direct connection between them. From my point of view, our website has all kinds of discussions and Daoism discussions might not be a significant part. Are there some stories behind the four characters, 道家学说?

Sorry, I do not want to practice your Wuwei Dandao, but thanks for taking time answering my questions. Hope you have good luck!

Thanks for answering my questions. It looks like that you invented "Wuwei Dandao" by yourself，so it is a new method, not something inherited. After studied《悟真篇》and《參同契》, you believed that you are able to understand these two books very well. You also believe that your "Wuwei Dandao" matches these two books perfectly. In China for more than 1,000 years, people wrote many annotation books or explanatory notes of 《悟真篇》and《參同契》, because they were unable to understand them, so they could not practice methods in the two books because they did not have a chance to learn the methods face to face from a master who had an authentic inheritance. If someone does not know the secret of cultivating golden elixir, and has no inheritance at all, how she/he is able to teach others? It seems for me that you need to write annotation books about《悟真篇》and《參同契》, and decrypt all metaphors in the two books. It would be a huge contribution to the world. People will come to you and follow you, and I might be one of the followers.

Thanks for trying to answer my questions. If you're talking about this resume, Posted April 1, "三十歲的時候，我跟佛教密宗大師學習本尊法。 三十五歲的時候，在最後一次參加南傳葛印卡的七日禪修之後，我決定捨棄所有的有為法。我開始修煉無為法。就從自發功下手。" I could not find a clue about your master of Wuwei Dandao, so I asked those two questions.

When you get a chance, could you please tell us something about your master of Wuwei Dandao? How many years you followed this master? Thanks.

谢谢您的详细解释。 养气 ，其法是忘形以养气。但忘形是人的自然状态么？在我看来不是。无论是今人还是古人，一个未开悟的普通人不会忘记自己的形，所以他们都一直耗气。忘言也不是人的自然状态。 Thanks for your detailed explanation. ”nourish qi“ or cultivating qi --- the method is by forgetting one's body. Is it a natural status of an ordinary person that he keeps forgetting the body of herself? I do not think so. Ordinary people, as long as they have not awoken, they will not forget their bodies, so they always consuming qi of themselves. Forgetting words or native language is not the natural status of ordinary people.

养气，忘言，降心，都是有为吧？

Come on, it is Leakless, not leaking.

很多人都是注册一个新账号，之后再看是否要恢复原来的账号。 如果你想找回原来的账号，我也可以帮你联系版主，看看能否有可能重置或解封。

五步真气运行法，I would translate it to "The five-steps of genuine Qi movement“. However, it is not a method of Nei dan shu. It is a qigong among hundreds qigongs, and it is not popular any more in China for many years. 漏盡閣 has nothing to do with a “leaking house”. It is a website of discussing Nei dan shu and Dao related topics. 漏盡 means "leakingless ", and 閣 is a building (pavilion）. There are hundreds of interesting and important topics posted in 漏盡閣 every year, so I do not understand why you picked a 10 years old boring topic.

http://www.humaniverse.net/dao/内经图/ http://www.humaniverse.net/dao/修真图s-3/ http://www.humaniverse.net/dao/修真内外火候图/