Lois

This isn't my video. It doesn't look like AI. And stop swearing.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XkK9UdD_Tns

https://torahbiblecodes.com/

I found it funny.

I'm not interested in this.

https://www.theomatics.com/

The Chick’s Intention: The Experiments of René Peoc’h In 1986 and 1995, French researcher René Peoc’h conducted a series of intriguing experiments, which he detailed in his paper, "Psychokinetic Action of Young Chicks." The Setup The experiment utilized a robot that moved randomly across a tabletop (similar to a modern robot vacuum). The robot's movements were governed by a Random Number Generator (RNG). When the robot was alone on the table, its path was truly random, covering the entire surface area evenly over time. Experiment 1: The "Mother" Robot In the first experiment, Peoc’h took newborn chicks and placed them near the moving robot for one hour. The idea was to trigger imprinting—a biological phenomenon where birds perceive the first moving object they see as their parent. The Procedure: Peoc’h then placed the imprinted chicks in a transparent cage at the edge of the table. The Result: Although the chicks were trapped, they clearly "wanted" to be near their "robot-mother." According to the study, their "power of intention" appeared to influence the robot. Instead of wandering the whole table, the robot began to spend a disproportionate amount of time in the area closest to the cage. Significance: Peoc’h claimed that dozens of trials with different chicks yielded statistically significant results. Experiment 2: The Search for Light In the second experiment, Peoc’h used chicks aged 1 to 7 days. This time, the robot was not imprinted as a parent. Instead, a lit candle was placed on the robot, serving as the only light source in a darkened room. The Result: The chicks (who presumably did not want to be left in the dark) seemingly "pulled" the robot toward their cage. The Control: This effect was not observed in a well-lit room, nor was it observed with a robot that had no candle in a dark room. Important Observations No Mechanical Bias: The theory that the table was tilted was ruled out, as a tilt would have caused the robot to migrate to the same side in every case, including the control trials. Humans vs. Chicks: Interestingly, attempts to replicate this using human operators failed. Humans were unable to "will" the robot to deviate from its path. The Theory: Researchers suggested that while humans viewed the task as a routine or boring exercise, the chicks were driven by a primal, biological "struggle for life," which perhaps exerted a stronger influence on the RNG.

This text is written in Avestan (the ancient Iranian language of Zoroastrian sacred texts). Before you is the beginning of the Yasna, the main liturgical part of the Avesta.

https://ottyg.narod.ru/akademie_1.htm

The connection between the Archimedean axiom and Zen Buddhism is subtle but very precise. It runs not through formulas, but through an attitude toward infinity, emptiness, and process. 1. No “ultimate grain” of reality The Archimedean axiom states: there is no absolutely smallest segment that is ontologically different from all others. Zen speaks almost the same language: there is no “final substance,” no minimal atom of being behind which the “true reality” is hidden. 🔹 In Zen there is no “secret layer” of the world. 🔹 Satori does not reveal a new substance — it removes an illusion. 2. Potential infinity = the Way (道) In Archimedean geometry: infinity is the possibility of continuation, not an already existing infinite thing. In Zen: the Way (道, dō) is not a goal, but continuous practice with no final point. Just as a segment can be divided endlessly, awakening never “finishes.” There is no moment of “I have reached infinity” — that is a mistake of the mind. 3. Emptiness ≠ infinitesimal A crucial distinction. In non-Archimedean mathematics: emptiness is replaced by the infinitesimal, something “smaller than any measurable quantity.” In Zen: emptiness (空, śūnyatā) is not an object, not a scale, not a quantity. In this sense, the Archimedean axiom is closer to Zen: if something is smaller than everything measurable, it is not a new entity, but a conceptual error. 4. Homogeneity of the moment The Archimedean continuum: every part of the line is of the same kind as any other. Zen: every moment is complete, there is no “more real” or “less real” moment. One breath is no closer to truth than a thousand years of meditation. This is a rejection of depth hierarchy. 5. Anti-metaphysics of depth Non-Archimedean structures assume: hidden layers, inaccessible to ordinary counting. Zen radically refuses this: if you search for something deeper, you have already missed it. Truth is not in the microscopic and not in the cosmic, but in the present. 6. Measurement as a conventional practice Important: Zen does not reject measurement — just as Archimedes does not. But: measurement is a tool, not a description of essence. Archimedes: measurement always works, but does not exhaust meaning. Zen: practice works, but does not fix truth. 7. Koan as anti-infinity A koan destroys the mind’s attempt: to find a final element, to grasp absolute smallness or absolute depth. “What is the sound of one hand clapping?” Not an infinitesimal sound, but a halt of division. 8. Reduced to one image The Archimedean line and the Zen path are the same: no hidden levels, no minimal grain, no final point, only the possibility of the next step. 9. A Zen–Archimedean formula If something cannot be surpassed by repeating the finite, then it is not a depth of reality, but an attachment of the mind.

I have a Torah code search program. Would you like to try it?

The entire Torah is completely encrypted, and people are searching for these codes using computers. A pioneer in this field was mathematics professor Eliyahu Rips, who lived in Israel. Dr. Rips was a leading expert in mathematics, and he mathematically proved that the probability of a random coincidence approaches zero. This is a stab in the back for all atheists.

I suggest we discuss my new page. https://ottyg.narod.ru/magija_en.html