Lairg

My experimental observations support the following propositions: - every planet, sun and galaxy, each exists within an entity (logos) that uses that as its body of "incarnation" - each Logos is sensitive to the species, energies, relationships and intents within its body - where events/actions/intents within that body are contrary to the proper unfoldment of that body within the greater cosmic system, the Logos feels discomfort - the body of the Logos contains intelligences that deal with the difficult energies. These intelligences have various cultural names such as Lipika Lords and Recording Angel - the Lords of Karma put pressure on the sources of disturbances - using entities on various planes. Hence sayings such as: As you sow, so shall you reap. - the pressures can be classified as personal or group, and by the level of the Logos on which the discomfort is occurring. - personal karma is harder to avoid as the person needs to learn - group karma can be redirected to other lines of least resistance, on request by a suitable entity - sometimes the lessons have been learned by the appropriate parties but the karmic energy/pressure is still present. Usually removal only requires a polite specific request by a suitable entity

We are free to choose, but only free to cause in very limited situations

Are there unbiased experiments that can demonstrate the existence of free will? For example, if a religious person makes a choice, how do we know that it is a choice unbiased by beliefs? Perhaps the main exercise of free will is in deciding what to believe

A generally excellent proposition. So are there preconditions for responding rather than reacting? Do reactionary humans not have much free will? Even today many media interviewers ask: What's your reaction to ....?

What are requirements for free will? - control of physical desires - control of emotional desires - control of thoughts - control of heart energies - ..... By age of 7 the child traditionally was held responsible for what it did. A couple of generations ago, by age of 21 the new adult was held responsible for its thoughts and allowed to vote. As I recall Jung believed that by 42 it was possible to be ready for a mission in life It seems that freedom of will takes much work

As far as I can see, the human is designed to undertake responsibilities in the local cosmos. The counter move is to teach humans to believe that they are weak and dependent upon others - including gods and religions The enthusiasm for oppressing Earth humans is so strong that I suspect a degree of panic

I chose the end of plankton - but nothing seemed to happen. Does free will actually control anything other than the attitude of the human?

Just as humans like to eat a wide variety of species, so there are inner plane species that like to live off the life force in humans If the latter are demons, then perhaps humans are demons also Perhaps a more delicate classification would assist

We are all entitled to our preferred belief system There may however be difficulties when the beliefs restrict the unfoldment of human spirituality - and thereby limit the delegation of authority

The human is embedded in a much bigger system. If the human: - decides to go with the cosmic river on its trip to the cosmic ocean - controls, refines, aligns its personality - releases belief systems the human may be delegated aspects of authority - mainly based on flow of life force in the immediate surroundings and species. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_World's_Sixteen_Crucified_Saviors

Indeed. I can often glimpse inner plane beings - confirmed in real time by some skilled friends. But when I imagine an image of Kwan Yin over my head, I then see a much greater range of beings that do not seem to interact with Earth humanity. How much more is there to see? Are there aspects of this universe that do not intersect with the inner planes on which humans exist? According to some accounts there are folds in this universe in which galaxies may be concealed - undiscovered by those that do not know the entrances All too hard? Easier to move on.