welkin

I edited it by adding the words "and banned" petty nungnuts. I hope you're ability to think is much broader than that, otherwise you will be what Apech has admittedly identified with as senile. To answer your question though, first bans only last 3 days. So tada here i am

Nung, Are you offended by the name Nungnuts? I was reported and banned for calling you that.

oops

I'll take that as your only source of understanding what the statement meant is through your convoluted influenced mind. Do you believe it isn't possible to truly know what that means without text? How did it become text in the first place?

First TDLR. Second, who or what would you be if it were not for texts, books, influence? I assume it would be undiscovered You speak about God, yet your only reference to that power is through texts and the imagination your mind places upon what you're taught

Well yes i do Mr Wads. Does that somehow require me to give an explanation of what it means?

Do you?

Hence the beauty of this life

You will not escape it because you are me and i am you. And we are everything

Hi Anand Limahung You like em RED? To each their own. Anand Saggity drop drop Limahung

Nah it's not. It can be, but it isn't. First of all there's no "the buddha". It only reminds of girls who mention their glutes as "the booty". His name is Siddhartha Gautama, and if you want to call him a buddha or buddha i'm cool with it. There's nothing wrong with desire and there's nothing wrong with suffering. The fact that you want to get rid of desire to rid yourself of suffering is the very reason you will always desire and always suffer.

what? lol Some chichis might cool you out.

That's it?

Hello

Chi is one half of chichi ( . ) ( . )

Words are spells Thoughts are anything and probably not yours Words are not thoughts

Spirituality isn't real Our world isn't real A world is real Lives are real Growth and practices are different levels of hamster wheels

In regards to my own personal thoughts and experiences. There a few types of measures i use. One is how the supernatural becomes involved in your experience along with physical reality. For example, 2 days after Notre Dame burned down, I feel asleep for 10 seconds. During those 10 seconds, i dreamt that the crown of thorns was in smoke (not in flames), and melting away. At the time, i was completely, aware that the crown of thorns existed or was even kept at the Notre Dame Church. Only after the dream did i look it up and find that out. Another way is being guided to find physical evidence in something let's say 500 years ago and you find it on yourself and as a result find other specific relations to it. These are only a couple, there are many more that just need to remain private, just as anyone should keep them private as they don't matter for others to know. What's interesting is that supernatural or Godly intervention is always created, but in the most subtle of ways. When ones gets to a specific point, and requires physical proof for our physical monkey brains, God/supernatural provides it when necessary. And much less, will the supernatural reveal itself to the masses. When one gets to a certain level of understanding, experience, and maturity, i believe one is not only allowed but allow themselves to prove and show to a few. It comes full circle. God guided and showed you in a specific way. Then one experiences, learns, and understands why one too would teach and show in the same way to others. More proof that it is not for everyone to experience these things is that this duty/purpose exists even prior to or during your birth. So it's also hard for a person on a physical earthly ego level to take credit for any of it. care, love, duty, purpose. Maybe God will show up if we try.

I don't think it's as important to prove the existence of the supernatural/God to others, as it is important to prove it to one's self. What I mean is differentiating the circumstantial truth/reality from the delusion one might create for themselves through greed and ego. It also doesn't mean that one doesn't find delusion along the way to experiencing truth or reality of the supernatural. They're very near each other and possibly mixed. It is also very difficult to prove it to another, especially if in an early stage of the supernatural experiences for the reasons mentioned above. Especially because the proof is typically not from one big experience, but from chunks of experiences separated by time and circumstances. And during those in-between times, it did require what you would call delusional/non supernatural/physical realm thinking experiences to get to the next truly supernatural experience. If you were to try to explain that to just anyone, they're minds wouldn't have the capability to comprehend. And then we speak about those who could potentially comprehend, but aren't even near that experiential level to make anything of it. They are few and far in between, who could comprehend each other's experiences as a group because they are of similar mind and experiences, maybe cut from the same cloth. And those supernatural experiences most definitely do not come from knowledge (one reads or learns) alone, and many times doesn't require it at all. If anything that knowledge and what one reads may be the very delusion one creates based on wanting to experience it so badly. Quite possibly that itself is supernatural, as we ourselves come from the supernatural source. And so we can delusionally create those experiences and manifest them. But it is the type of supernatural i'd rather not be a part of as it may or may not be solely mind driven. That is why it is stupid to judge or reject another's 'supernatural' experiences, judging them of ego and what not. Because you simply don't know. That criticism of others' is most likely they're own criticism of themselves as well as. Even if they're right about criticizing another's experience as egotistical and delusional, they're probably subconsciously correct about themselves as well.

Oh come on Nungnuts, i was just going along with your disingenuous victimization. But now it seems you're trying to get personal. Not even sure your use of quotes makes any sense. And this has quite possibly gotta be the biggest irony or lack of self awareness i've ever seen. The best lack all conviction, while the worst Are full of passionate intensity.

No no don't take it the wrong way./ post as you'd like. just don't be a troll ""

Grumpy ole nungnuts..

Did you ever notice it before i showed you? Did you see anyone else demonstrate it? The term invisible isn't to describe something that's not there.. It's that it's invisible to your eye.. Sometimes i wonder about your level of perception. And I'm not speaking about your external one, though that one is even more obvious. Make of it what you will. In response to your mirror comment. i was simply replying to your idea of reflection. i should've said reflection.. Don't trash this or the other thread please, especially if you have nothing worthwhile to say.

Agreed. That's the learned understanding i have, but there's no way of proving that other than the stories and explanations the supposed ascended ones give. An idea did occur to me recently however. The possibility that self realization is but a mere step in the process of truly ascending. Maybe there is no true ascension by one's self, but needs to be done as a majorative collective in this realm. Just an idea. I'm more inclined that supposed ascended ones never stopped coming back and never had the choice.