Jadespear

...I think you may misunderstand. I have never claimed to "manipulate" as the word conjures negative connotation of cleverly rendering what is truth asunder by ones efforts. I have only "influenced" things through the way of thought and other ways which have allowed me to understand the way things work and function. A persons biological birth doesn't change over the course of their life...it is part of their "karma" - as in determined by past actions of themselves, and their parents. No one can literally go back into the past and change it so that the present moment is different, it's impossible. Adepts may be able to visit the akasha and experience things from the past - but they can't change all the events that lead up to them... thats literally impossible. Literally Re-writing history isn't possible. Literally re-writing the history and karma of ones past isn't possible - changing this is also impossible. Objective truth is real, is absolute, and cannot be altered by anyone. Literally changing ones biological and genetic make up into the opposite sex by physical means isn't possible. ...Influencing the physical world is simply an expression that everyone does whether they know they are doing it or not - that's part of what I think "enlightenment" is - becoming aware of what you are actually doing and how you are making an impact to the world around you.

Hey, so - if you actually don't recognize what is true, it still is true. What you are born as doesn't change. Great for you if you feel better about yourself for doing whatever to yourself. Simple facts remain and nothing anyone says or does can change them. The only reason I bring it up is because I'm tired of hearing these arguments everywhere that make no sense. No one can change what is objectively true, the facts speak for themselves.

... I don't care about fancy fashionable terms. You are born a woman or a man. Removing the reproductive organs is just removing them, your DNA is still the same. So, to answer your question - yes a woman who was born a woman but has removed her reproductive organs is still a woman. She can't change into a man, nor can the vice versa be true. And there is no changing of this as a fact. Im not trying to be rude or arrogant or anything, its just that let's call it for what it is, not what people want it to be. People who change their outward appearance are not the same as ones who do not, and they never will be actual true men or women. ...sorry to report - but many people who attempt gender re-assignment end up with many more problematic conditions because their bodies treat everything they do to themselves as wounds. As in - your body knows that you're messing it up and it tries to heal itself. Natural ways of living do not require pills and elaborate treatments to exist, or survive, beyond normal basic things like food, water, and shelter.

...I'm just curious, and I really mean no dissrespect. But, can someone who claims to be a transgender woman, really actually believe they are a true biological woman? How is this so? You don't have a uterus, or female internal biology... you will never generate those organs after a certain period of human biological development and you will never be able to produce eggs. And you cannot change this as a fact no matter how hard you try.

I second that my friend.

...I don't like the word "enlightenment". No one can agree on what it actually means, beyond some type of actual knowledge or realization. I think knowledge is a much better word. Philosophically I suppose at a certain level "knowledge" would have to be surpassed by experience, and in due course would give way to an "enlightened state of being" - as in literally imbibed with light. Such a state seems to be one of common goals amongst eastern religions. Purifying the astral body by means of the actual light of ourselves in methodical ways... high level practices such as dzogchen practices and taoist yoga transform oneself in this regard as far as I can understand them, back to the source (light). ...big question I have, is why do this at all? It's very hard for me to accept as fact that all of us are required or obligated in some way as guided by some definite and absolute destiny beyond ourselves to undertake such practices. ...I could be very wrong of course, it's just that there are many ways back to walk back to where you came from... Some circles don't believe this to the extent that others do...the spiritual journey continues on in the afterlife and is much easier because we don't have physicality to work through.

...don't know if this applies at all to Dan Tien meditation - but, when I take cannabis and retain stillness to some degree - I tend to alter electronic frequencies with my mind and emotion... It's actually kind of annoying. I de-energized an entire concert venue once due to being polarized in yin. I would not suggest or recommend using any physical aids at all to meditation, even so called natural ones... herbs, etc. ...Remain in the childlike awareness (Pure and Still) with the physical state of oneself as a child was - innocent and naturally healthy. To remain in good health, one need only follow the balance recommended by the Tao of daily food intake - a blend of the 5 tastes in equal proportions (Sweet/Salty/Spicy/Sour/Bitter) - combined with proper Ph balance of acid- alkaline (yin-yang) 50/50.

Super cool!

...clearly the power of complete and total distraction is well at the hands of many on this thread of intellectual fools... Sad to see this forum has turned into a complete mockery of taoism and in its place has become a bastion of haphazard wannabes who don't even know how to converse in proper language. Even more disappointing is the fact that people here try to argue endlessly about nothing important. ...get a life.

If anyone is at all interested in actual discussions of value, let’s have those.

... yes cross training is highly encouraged by me. These subjects are just like anything else, they involve what is real (facts) how to work with them (practice) and ways of doing that (skills) towards an end (goal). The more you know the easier things are to figure out for yourself. ... yeah its really too bad that some people try to monetize these things. Probably why they were hidden from people throughout history. It's good in the end though, as we don't want people around us who are evil sorcerers. This knowledge is too dangerous for the ignoble and unwise.

... Yes I am. Although, I'm more of a mix of practices aligned mostly to the Vedic tradition. Advaita Vedanta information and observations actually describe what I have experienced the best so far... What's with all this denial of solo cultivation? It's a well known practice, actually the highest one in my opinion... takes much more diligence and intelligence to find your own way than to follow instructions from an isolated tradition. Plus many traditions don't even know about or even are aware of some things you discover. Pratyekabuddhayana - widely known. Lone buddhas are solo practitioners. ...currently my practice involves enjoying the bliss of myself. It's utterly awesome, and is also known about by others... quoted on in the Bhagavad Gita: "Awareness of consciousness itself is everlasting joy." I highly recommend ati yoga. All of the intellectual workings help the mind, but it ultimately needs to be focused on the right thing...the self. ...I will say - the buddhists describe things in a strange way... but I suspect they have a similar view, just described in a weird way. Like - they say there is something called the "no-self". So, there is something, but it's not the self that people have the idea of themselves about not one's ego... kinda confusing to call something that exists as a negative... ...doesn't really matter, as the golden light of my own consciousness and the golden light behind existence are light. I've seen it myself... I don't need any other description. Light works for me. We are beings of light.

Dude, Master solo.... sounds like you have had an interesting series of events and discoveries, Congratulations!!!!

Health - meditation called "The Microcosmic Orbit" - written about at length by Mantak Chia and other taoists. Peace of mind - Stillness meditation. Just be still. Don't allow anything to disturb you. Strength - Internal arts meditations, many kinds depending on what you want to strengthen.

so- you think using an example from a fantasy fictional movie is going to help you understand the mysteries of how life operates? …ok. they are part of the natural law- that’s the whole point. They are not understood by science because there is little research of them. sounds like you’re just speculating without any experience… sorry but- it doesn’t sound like you know anything practical about what you’re talking about.

...no they aren't - you're wrong. They are not subjective at all, they are an objective expression that creates events in real time that can be observed by anyone. ...why else do you think there is such a large tradition of them in these subjects? Your statement is implying that these are figments of ones imagination...

...Striling - it seems like you are attempting to understand this in terms or some cause-effect relationship. As if to imply and hypothesize that one cannot occur before the other... Is this your suspicion? If it is - please remember that not all people have ever experienced things in a perfectly linear way... each tradition or school probably has a focus, but that is all. There is no "grand enlightenment" that is a pre-requisite, as that word and concept doesn't mean anything if taken in this context - as to mean anything but a person resting in their own true nature. Which sounds like what you describe "enlightenment" to be. However there are the correct circumstances internally that when disposed in certain ways allow the expression of Siddhis to occur. So in other words, yes - there is a cause and effect relationship. The causal part is a combination of what oneself is, how oneself is, and how one directs ones mind.

...hey you guys... its all well and good to have a discourse, but - why not find these answers yourself? Thats what I did. Thats what I still do. The reality we live in only appears "mundane" because of ones perception, the great grandeur that is life is beyond the ability of words to describe, beyond meaning to be bound to, and beyond intellectual thought and reason to define. We are all part of the Tao. The Tao is part of all of us. The Tao is something that can be learned and understood in its phenomenal and magically miraculously appearing aspects. Even though we are capable of great things, all that matters in the end is how we treat each other. "Occult abilities are just flowers of the tao, and the beginning of all foolishness. The master rests in root and not in the flower" Verse 15: The ancient Masters were profound and subtle. Their wisdom was unfathomable. There is no way to describe it; all we can describe is their appearance. They were careful as someone crossing an iced-over stream. Alert as a warrior in enemy territory. Courteous as a guest. Fluid as melting ice. Shapable as a block of wood. Receptive as a valley. Clear as a glass of water. Do you have the patience to wait till your mud settles and the water is clear? Can you remain unmoving till the right action arises by itself? The Master doesn’t seek fulfillment. Not seeking, not expecting, she is present, and can welcome all things

I don't work in any tradition. Only the real and true way of existence... beyond and a part of all traditions. (The Tao). What is considered uncommon siddhi? Can't answer the other questions, as I don't know what you mean by this. Examples... too many to talk about really. Sure lets private message, as I would like to know what the uncommon siddhi (enlightenment) you describe is... the word enlightenment doesn't mean much to me, as no one agrees on it and it was never a part of the ancient traditions lexicon at all. That word was invented by an Englishman.

... you sure you want to know? ... its actually very strange - I've turned $5 into $20 by the virtue of thought - a bill into a different denotational size. I've also used the mental fluid of myself to create things out of myself... that one is quite complex.

...those are the greek roots of the word. The concept of "god" has not been only limited to greek culture, it has been spread throughout the world in different languages. The hindus call it "the absolute", the taoists call it "the tao", the Islams call it "Allah", magicians call it "the divine" What they all have in common is not the term used to decribe it but the general nature of it - itself. Why is this so hard to understand? If you can't read through the lines by doing intellectual inquiry into philosophy, perhaps you're not ready to understand these things. They all ascribe that it is boundless, formless, and everywhere - because it is. It is the cause of existence - permanent and unchanging, and manages existence. The taoists say it in a cool way ' "The great tao is hidden deeply in all things". it's not observable through modern physical science, a person has to reach it themself through spiritual practice. Which is what all the eastern traditions espouse.

Hi There, I have experienced Siddhis through shifts and states of being as extensions of consciousness. Notable experiences include phenomenon associated to the following: Telepathy Spontaneous materialization Matter re-shaping (changing one thing into another) Prophecy Far reach of thought Energy manipulation of myself and electrical signals in the outside world. Weather magic. ...I constantly live in a state where what I think about generally has a genuine high probability of manifesting itself into my life. If I think about something or someone in an emotional way (no matter what it is) - it generally comes to me or happens to occur. Not all the time, but a lot of the time.

IF Y'all want to get down into it, why is it so hard? The word "divine" means cause. The causal principle. The place/thing/space that all other formed things come from to have an existence. The source of creation is all around us all the time. The tao is beyond time and space and is undiscriminating in its deepest sense - it is impersonal in the sense that it is not a "person" but it is personal in the sense that it has traits or thing by which one can know and understand it. Existence itself is ultimately it - as all life simply procreates itself moment by moment in the temporal (finite_ world through the means and mechanisms of determined law to bring about infinite forms into existence. God is the source of reality behind reality, dee within reality. Everyone and everything is always connected to it beyond their choice.

Nicely put... and in the rational view, chaos and disorder as described above are entirely wrong. Biological human men are born and do not contain biological organs and biology to have periods or become impregnated. The facts remain. Men are men and women are women as defined by their biology. Chaos and disorder are words to describe perceptions of life, not actual life itself. No surgery or hormonal therapy will ever fully convert a man into a woman or vice versa. People who try and distort the actual true meaning of words and facts of life have been around ever since we have existed. They are seen as heretics because they are. They hold no objective purpose besides attempting to prove themselves against what is already real, an ignorant and selfish attitude and attempt that history has shown usually loses against the actual truth that wise people embrace, know, extoll, and promote to the rest of the world. The voices of such misguided and sick people should never be taken seriously, as all they are are cries for attention and self validation from fools who mistakenly believe their own viewpoint defines existence itself. ...in case you missed it - I'm really tired of these kind of people. All they do is pollute the world with confusion and lies. Cast aside natural order? For what? So they can act all clever and run around in mental circles attempting to prove their nonsense is what. Pretty pathetic. Get a life, don't be an atheist.

Anyone who believes in chaos and disorder as the answer to what existence is, are largely mistaken. It's really simple to see why they are wrong...that's why science is a great tool to use in the pursuit of the truth. Certain things can only occur under the right circumstances, just as certain things cannot occur under the certain circumstances. Simple things like childbirth, etc. the act of biological life being created must adhere to certain circumstances or (laws), there is no alternative. I don't believe your description of "agnostic" is true. It ha nothing to do with chaos or order. An Agnostic is someone who posits the existence of a higher power but does not subscribe to any dogmatic definition of it. They simply believe in "something" greater than themselves without forming religious ideas about it, or ideas of any kind about it. They don't really hold a belief as much as they do simply hold an observation. Hence why the term "agnostic" is also used in secular terms to describe someone who is "indifferent".