Sign in to follow this  
Lois

The connection between the Archimedean axiom and Zen Buddhism

Recommended Posts

The connection between the Archimedean axiom and Zen Buddhism is subtle but very precise. It runs not through formulas, but through an attitude toward infinity, emptiness, and process.


1. No “ultimate grain” of reality

The Archimedean axiom states:

there is no absolutely smallest segment that is ontologically different from all others.

Zen speaks almost the same language:

there is no “final substance,”
no minimal atom of being
behind which the “true reality” is hidden.

đŸ”č In Zen there is no “secret layer” of the world.
đŸ”č Satori does not reveal a new substance — it removes an illusion.


2. Potential infinity = the Way (道)

In Archimedean geometry:

  • infinity is the possibility of continuation,

  • not an already existing infinite thing.

In Zen:

  • the Way (道, dƍ) is not a goal,

  • but continuous practice with no final point.

Just as a segment can be divided endlessly,
awakening never “finishes.”

There is no moment of “I have reached infinity” — that is a mistake of the mind.


3. Emptiness ≠ infinitesimal

A crucial distinction.

In non-Archimedean mathematics:

  • emptiness is replaced by the infinitesimal,

  • something “smaller than any measurable quantity.”

In Zen:

  • emptiness (ç©ș, ƛƫnyatā) is not an object,

  • not a scale,

  • not a quantity.

In this sense, the Archimedean axiom is closer to Zen:

if something is smaller than everything measurable,
it is not a new entity, but a conceptual error.


4. Homogeneity of the moment

The Archimedean continuum:

  • every part of the line is of the same kind as any other.

Zen:

  • every moment is complete,

  • there is no “more real” or “less real” moment.

One breath is no closer to truth than a thousand years of meditation.

This is a rejection of depth hierarchy.


5. Anti-metaphysics of depth

Non-Archimedean structures assume:

  • hidden layers,

  • inaccessible to ordinary counting.

Zen radically refuses this:

if you search for something deeper, you have already missed it.

Truth is not in the microscopic and not in the cosmic,
but in the present.


6. Measurement as a conventional practice

Important: Zen does not reject measurement — just as Archimedes does not.

But:

  • measurement is a tool,

  • not a description of essence.

Archimedes:

  • measurement always works,

  • but does not exhaust meaning.

Zen:

  • practice works,

  • but does not fix truth.


7. Koan as anti-infinity

A koan destroys the mind’s attempt:

  • to find a final element,

  • to grasp absolute smallness or absolute depth.

“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”
Not an infinitesimal sound,
but a halt of division.


8. Reduced to one image

The Archimedean line and the Zen path are the same:

  • no hidden levels,

  • no minimal grain,

  • no final point,

  • only the possibility of the next step.


9. A Zen–Archimedean formula

If something cannot be surpassed by repeating the finite,
then it is not a depth of reality,
but an attachment of the mind.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this