MooNiNite

The Dao Bums
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    4,049

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by MooNiNite

  4. Posted · Edited by MooNiNite

    Hi,

     

    The goal of this thread is to locate great charities. Organizations worth donating to.

     

    An important factor is how they manage their money, and what percentage of the donated money actually goes towards the cause, and not into people's pockets who are already well off. 

     

    List of Charities:

     

    Embracing the World - Amma's Indian Charity - http://www.embracingtheworld.org

     

    Mercy Corps - Helping with natural disaster, economic collapse, or conflict

     

    Please comment below which charity you like and I will continually update the list.

     

     

  5. Posted

    The African origin theory is only based on fossils: it is just who ever has the oldest. So they found old fossils of modern humans in Africa, thus every human originated from Africa because that is where the oldest fossils of modern humans were found. 

     

    But wait, they found even older fossils of modern humans in China and possibly else where... 

  9. Posted · Edited by MooNiNite

    2 minutes ago, CedarTree said:

    Sums it all up there. :) Wisdom.

    Not always. There are a lot of very helpful programs that involve separating people ideologically. 


    Such as the projects by western modern medicine professionals focused on restoring eyesight to the people in Burma. 

  11. Posted

    Just now, Apech said:

     

     

    That's because the interbreeding happened in Europe where the Neanderthals lived - the modern humans moved in an replaced them.  Those humans who stayed in Africa did not meet the Neanderthals so therefore obviously could not interbreed.

     

     

    See I thought all human originated from Africa and evolved from the same more primitive form of human (neanderthal).

    So then according to your comment, from what did the ancient african humans evolve from? 

  12. Posted · Edited by MooNiNite

    10 minutes ago, Apech said:

     

     

    This has been known for some time - non Africans have 1 - 4% Neanderthal DNA.  To address the points made in that blog:  If you accept the categorisation of 'races' no-one as far as I know says this means everyone is the same.  Saying they are equal means they are all equally human and entitled the same respect and so on.  So the writer is confusing equality with sameness.

     

    The fact that we interbred with Neanderthal suggests more than anything else that we were closer than formerly thought and indeed possibly the same species - so traces of Neanderthal DNA does not make whites and asians a different species to black people.

    I agree about the species thing, dunno why they made that point. 

    So zero African people interbred with Neanderthals? 

  13. Posted

    On 6/29/2017 at 5:14 PM, Apech said:

     

    Really?  Explain.

     

    We were talking about distinguishing races and i read this recently which reminded me of our conversation. 

     

    It would seem every race but African is part Neanderthal. 

     

    https://www.seeker.com/all-non-africans-part-neanderthal-genetics-confirm-1765302858.html

     

    Then I also read this from a comment:

     

    "Believing the races are equal is a sign of a person so saturated in political correctness as to have lost their ability to reason. Blacks are the only race with no Neanderthal DNA, therefore they share no common ancestor with the other races. Are they then a separate species? A strong case for this can be made because Blacks have a genetic distance from Whites and Asians. That means Blacks are more closely related to archaic hominids than to modern man. Whites and Asians are more closely related to Erectus. "

     

     

    • Like 1

  14. Posted

    On 7/6/2017 at 9:09 PM, shaq420 said:

     

     

     

    This is very interesting and I would like to offer some speculation or insight. If you watch the first video and go to the third clip. You will see John Tsai's teacher doing a demonstration. He is able to move his dan tien from his lower abdomen to his upper abdomen. It almost looks like a big cancerous lump or disease.

     

    As soon as I saw this I was shocked because this looks to me like very high level energy work. If you remember Kosta's book, Kosta mentioned a guy doing demonstrations in the USA (obviously he is not referring to John Tsai's teacher, but another man). This man from Kosta's book had similar abilities to move his dan tien around his body which doctors thought was a cancerous lump. Kosta told John Chang about this man and Chang said he had obtained an equivalency of Mo Pai Level 3! So it makes me wonder if John Tsai's master is at least level 3 for mo pai equivalency. The only reason I mention mo pai here is because this system John Tsai is teaching has the potential to go very far and your seeing possible proof in that demo.

     

    Only people that get confused form Kosta's teachings actually believe that lump is the lower dan tien. 

  18. Posted

    14 minutes ago, voidisyinyang said:

    I'm listening to her right now. Hot Springs is where he retired.

     

    So this is very fascinating. His lineage is called 17th Generation Shaolin Mei Hua Qigong Grand Master John Tsai .

     

    Yeah I'm just amazed that no one on this website has mentioned him before.

     

    There's several posters here from Chicago. His son still teaches in chicago....

     

     

    I found the website for the lady's school. Is there a website for his son in Chicago?

  25. Posted

    Just now, Apech said:

     

    You define the limits of the application of terms.

     

    I don't get your last point at all - I am probably being dense :)

     

    "Well the whole point for me is that I don't have one because I think the flaw is basically trying to divide people in this way."

     

    You're saying it is flawed to divide people by historical locality and physical characteristics.