ok ok, ive been trying to avoid becoming engaged, but here goes...
It is a challenge to find the balance between 'let be what is' and speaking out ... but I've seen too much wrong to stay silent and thus began posting information on Dr Sha to inform the innocent, as well as get feed back to help sort my own way through the mess (thank you Yoda, you're posts are excellent). Yes we each need to find our own way and are on our own path - its a question about at what time we recieve the lessons. This is not about putting others down, its about informing the innocent: we and they are on a path too (your path lead you to read this...)
However I cannot share my personal information (i.e. personal story) as it involves a number of others close to me who's privacy I need to respect, and/or because there may be dissapointment to know of my postings because their sense of forgiveness doesn't allow for speaking out. Lets just say this: it involves over $200k to Dr Sha and an especially yet needlessly difficult death (all medical treatment avoided in lieu of 'downloads'....Dr Sha capitalizes on western fear of death afterall). And really, my story doesnt matter (there are lots of other stories or observations from others on the forums now anyway) as people shouldn't decide based on other's experiences, but based on what they feel within (provided they have access to all the information).
There is also some fear of backlash from Dr Sha and his business team as he has stated very strongly that he will 'protect the Mission'. For one, I dont wish apon my self any 'badspeak' Sha is known to say about those who dont support the mission. But also he has a strong legal team and the money to fund it - I dont wish to be part of some sort of Gentle Winds Project court case (as "enlightening" as that would be ;-)
Anyway, to thus maintain my anonymity, I created a separate accounts just for my postings on Dr Sha, and chose the name anonymous to make it clear I would like to remain so. I've also posted on other forums as "real servant" , which was just an 'anti' to Dr Sha's use of the term 'Universal Servant'. I have no affiliation of any kind, being an open-minded spiritual seeker who has experimented with a number of belief systems, enough to know where some pitfalls can mess with the benefits*.
(* I would highly reccommend Elizabeth Lesser's book, "A Seekers Guide" for so elequently capturing some of these issues, some of which are so rampant within Dr Sha's organization, and yet providing a balanced view on the benefits of spiritual seeking and making 'discoveries' along the way.)
I should also qualify: I feel sorry for Dr Sha and his top followers -they are not outright trying to run a scam, but their ego's have self deluded themselves to the point of really believing they have a monopoly on the Divine's direct wishes, which of course then justifies anything and everything. One day the light at the end of the tunnel is going to be an uncoming train. I hope they see the real light before then.
I hope that answers your questions.