voidisyinyang

Yeah I'm sure that's what YOU want to think. haha. Read Master Nan, Huai-chin - he was a best seller in China and considered a "living Buddha" He says that Buddhism easily gets morphed too easily into "dead tree" Buddhism - too mental and not the necessary body transformations. I already posted the Buddhist quote about the Wind element and the body energy channels. master Nan, Huai-chin makes fun of Buddhists - so how many of you monks can even sit in full lotus for one day nonstop? Huh? So you can post all the fancy b.s. you want. But you can't fake the full lotus. haha. Hilarious. We've had this conversation on this website forever. People fight with their mind all they want. It doesn't matter. I'm not gonna post more Master Nan, Huai-chin quotes. This is a thread on the difference between Buddhism and Daoism - and he bridged that difference, as a Ch'an Master. So if you are interested in the topic of this thread - then read his books. Otherwise practice willful ignorance and live with your self. It's your choice - feel free to do whatever you want.

The form of the formless is the Tai Chi as noncommutative phase harmonics - complementary opposites. My free pdf gives the details with plenty of citations, etc. and lots of images. So the mind fights against the full lotus - so be it. Sure it is not necessary but full lotus demonstrates the channels are open. As http://springforestqigong.com stated if you want to see if someone is a real spiritual master just see how long they can sit in full lotus in ease - no pain, etc. So no it's not "necessary" yet all the people claiming they don't need full lotus are fakes. haha.

Here's your pure Nordic Aryan b.s. debunked in a nice image for you. White skin in Europe is from monocultural wheat farming. http://www.sgr.fi/sust/sust266/sust266_kroonen.pdf Non-Indo-European Root Nouns in Germanic: Agricultural Substrate Hypothesis. pdf. Guus Kroonen. https://forums.skadi.info/showthread.php?t=152087 Kongming: Tell us more B.S. lies!! haha. Hilarious. Now back to the truth: Yep - I just posted the genetics that corroborates this argument of Guus Kroonen!! Checkmate: So your "fascination" with the white Latin roman farmers? haha - that's from Non-Indo-European origins!!

Caucasoid Steppe Aryanoid? Hilarious! https://www.thoughtco.com/dairy-farming-ancient-history-171199 Just as I stated. https://www.worldfamilies.net/forum/index.php?topic=9491.25;wap2 So much for your Nordic R1a claim. Early Neolithic Southern Caucasus - NOT Indo-European as the source of most common chromosome lineage in Europe. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4249771/ So you have Caucasoid Neolithic farming migration as the most common chromosome in Europe - No Indo-Aryan source. Hilarious. So you have white lebanese, white caucosoids in armenia, white europeans - all from wheat monocultural farming spread from the Near East/West Asia into the Southern Caucus.

So now you want to claim some Latin purity - IndoEuropean is a language terminology. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2007/06/lydians-etruscans/#.WVvZBlGQwqQ Your fascination is just your ignorance being projected onto reality: Stop using the word "Caucasian" to mean white Hilarious!! dang - that nails it. White people are from farming - not your "Aryan caucasoid" fantasy. Hilarious! White skin is malnutrition - lack of vitamin D in the diet. White skin does not mean "pure" as in Aryan. The root word Aryan is from semitic-African language, when farming first started. Those people became white due to malnutrition. WRONG. http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/01/stop-using-the-word-caucasian-to-mean-white/#.WVvbVVGQwqQ Later they migrated to the Steppes - to escape the ecological destruction of the early farming. The steppe culture later migrated into Europe - and then into India. Yes those people were white - but they were not the origin of white skin. The people you are referring to are called "Late-PIE" or Late Proto-Indo-European. Do you get it yet? Volker Heyd, Kossinna's smile, Antiquity, Volume 91, Issue 356, April 2017, pp. 348-359, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2017.17 So the farmers were already white. The herders were white from the white farmers - the herders were "semi-nomadic" and also had wheat farming. Do you get it yet? So because the Etruscans were not white farmers - they had darker skin. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-06/esoh-aew061307.php The Etruscans had Mongol ethnicity - which means they were not farmer white yet. Etruscans were a cattle culture - as pastoralists. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055519 So your white skin fetish is from the older neolithic culture - while Etruscan is from the later "indo-European" cattle migration. Hilarious! https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=2Ofa_0Y5Iu8C&oi=fnd&pg=PA56&ots=U4hWezauF6&sig=luieLACBHlrkqVUozAATDRRl1kw#v=onepage&q=pastoral&f=false The Etruscan World Jean MacIntosh Turfa Routledge, Nov 13, 2014 so this book notes that the Etruscans had a better diet than the Romans and less cavities - since the Etruscans relied on cattle pastoralism more than on grain, like the romans. Hilarious - your Indo-European Cattle migrants were LESS WHITE than the Roman wheat farmers.

There's no such thing as a 'pure' European—or anyone else By Ann GibbonsMay. 15, 2017 , 3:00 PM So you want to claim that northern Europeans are white because of a later Yamnaya migration but that is not true. http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/theres-no-such-thing-pure-european-or-anyone-else

You seem fixated on using the term "Aryan" and then claim that it is not because the Nazis used it. haha. Hilarious. You first state "linguistic" evidence - but the Wiki link I showed you already points out that only the Indian and Iranian cultures identified their people as a whole as Aryans - while the other linguistic links use Aryan to refer to an elite caste of people. The Nazi use of the term Aryan also referred to an elite caste of people. Therefore Aryan only applies to a particular region of people at a particular time and any other use of it is aligned with the Nazi use of the term - that is why academics don't use the term Aryan. http://new-indology.blogspot.gr/2017/01/the-term-aryan-and-its-semitic-cognates.html So even linguistically - the term Aryan has nothing to do with certain "phenotypes." You want to connect the word Aryan to phenotype and then even connect that to European "phenotypes" - again this is just Neo-Nazi rhetoric. That's Aryan to you? Hilarious - that is the standard Nazi definition of Aryan. O.K. so the use of the word Aryan is very limited and has a particular cultural origin. Now you want to talk about Northern European phenotypes? haha. Basically the genetics are primarily from the farmers - who again got white skin from wheat malnutrition - lack of vitamin D in the diet. This farming culture started around 11,000 BCE. So what happened is that it created ecological disaster - since the forest was cut down so people could water proof their houses from the ash. Hilarious since no forest, then no rain anyway. So then from this ecological disaster of early wheat monoculture - two things happened - you had white skin farmers escape as refugee immigrants into Europe - where the people were dark skin Africans as hunter-gatherers. That was around 9,000 BCE. Also you had pastoralism develop as an escape method to the wheat monocultural farming. So then the pastoralist Yamnaya culture is Indo-European - but NOT Aryan - and the Yamnaya culture then spread into Europe around when.... http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/02/thousands-horsemen-may-have-swept-bronze-age-europe-transforming-local-population So this is much later - Europe already had white skin people primarily from the farmers. Northern European blue eyes - like in Sweden - is also from dark skin albino eye-Africans. But the primary source of white skin in Europe is from the early wheat farmers - lack of vitamin D in the diet. So as I have pointed out - the white skin of Europe primarily came from the farmers of the near east-West Asia: http://sciencevibe.com/2017/05/25/most-modern-europeans-white-skin-did-not-evolve-in-europe-at-all/ And so Northern Europeans have more blue eyes from the African albinos. Blue eyes is an albino gene. https://www.livescience.com/42838-european-hunter-gatherer-genome-sequenced.html So now the term Aryan is not valid to describe European phenotypes. haha. Time to lose the Nazi terminology. http://new-indology.blogspot.gr/ Kongming read this: THEREFORE WRONG: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/24/science/agriculture-linked-to-dna-changes-in-ancient-europe.html?mcubz=1 Genomic Diversity and Admixture Differs for Stone-Age Scandinavian Foragers and Farmer, Pontus Skoglund, Helena Malmström, Ayça Omrak, Maanasa Raghavan, Cristina Valdiosera, Torsten Günther, Per Hall, Kristiina Tambets, Jüri Parik, Karl-Göran Sjögren, Jan Apel, Eske Willerslev, Jan Storå, Anders Götherström, and Mattias Jakobsson, Science, DOI:10.1126/science.1253448 http://www.unz.com/gnxp/plows-of-the-gods/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=plows-of-the-gods

http://forum.alchemyforums.com/archive/index.php/t-2215.html Crocs are also the number one killer animal in Africa.

http://cameronfreeman.com/socio-cultural/anthropology-religion-asian-traditions/theocratic-stage-emerging-chinese-religious-thought-practice/ Sorry - no mention of Aryan in this great overview of Shang Oracle Bone divination and Taoist philosophy. http://donlehmanjr.com/China/china chapters/china book2/china26.htm

the process is the aim. You always have a spirit in you. Westernized materialists don't realize this except for biophoton science. I have seen ghosts. We all have a spirit, shaped like a human, inside us. spiritual masters can create spirits to heal people. I have seen this done.

So that's your Aryan Empire? (quotes meaning a collection of nations?). haha. It's not very old is it? Maybe 700 BCE. So the Oracle Bones you cite are from around 700 BCe. The Tarim Basim mummies go back much older. The Tocharian language in China is one of the oldest Indo-European languages - the 2nd oldest. So the Chariot-Horse Indo-European culture is looking more like this. http://www.eupedia.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-29705.html Edwin Bryant - The Quest for the Origins of Vedic Culture (Oxford Uni. press / 2003) http://penn.museum/documents/publications/expedition/PDFs/52-3/mallory.pdf So your map refers to the "Iranian" language group - not the 'Indo-Aryan" language group.

http://www.forumbiodiversity.com/showthread.php/24396-Aryan-theories/page22

So you say Aryran was an "old empire" - and then you say that "caucasian" looking Chinese mummies are "not defined by race" - and then you say that an Aryan king has Chinese looking robes - yet you don't think that the Aryans created Chinese culture? Your claim is hilarious - it is full of confusion and self-circular tautologies. So take your first claim: Google search it. First hit: https://books.google.com/books?id=FOnsCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT284&lpg=PT284&dq="old+aryan+empire"&source=bl&ots=uQtVQt4brZ&sig=8DWn6a1I7n9_vMQtW043pB8goQQ&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjnys_31O7UAhXDwVQKHSoEAxgQ6AEIKDAA#v=onepage&q="old aryan empire"&f=false

That's a blatant racist phrase you are using. In other words, most Europeans have Crô-Magnon mitochondrial DNA because Neolithic farmers took the land and women of the hunter-gatherers. NOTE: ISOGG changed the name of HG R1b1b2 (R-M269) to HG R1b1a2 (R-M269). If you do not agree with the above quote about the Fertile Crescent origins of the Aryan race, and refuse to read or believe any of the scientific articles that support the theory that the ancestors of all Eurasian races lived in the African Sahel http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahel before they immigrated into the Fertile Crescent, why waste your time by reading any further? So http://whitebiocentrism.com/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=2517 What's so hilarious about this stupid Aryan Empire Neo-nazi b.s. is that the racists cite the genetic research of "farmers" and say that the Aryan genetics if from the culture of farming. Yep - white skin is from Malnutrition from wheat monocultural farming lacking vitamin D. Hilarious! The rest of that article is hilarious! Aryan Europeans. A racist term if there ever was one.

https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-actual-Aryans-Europeans-Iranians-or-Indians

So we have a self-circular racist logical tautology. https://www.quora.com/Who-are-the-actual-Aryans-Europeans-Iranians-or-Indians

I mentioned this to the qigong master who befriended me - I said, "so and so" says their "body type" does not allow them to get into full lotus. He said that is not true. I said, "another so and so" says they lift weights too much so they can't get into full lotus - he said also not true. When you build up the qi then the body becomes pliable. Full lotus on its own can just be flexibility - whereas full lotus meditation then cycles the energy on its own alchemically to open up the energy channels. You can read my free pdf for other training secrets to open up the energy channels. https://www.pdf-archive.com/2017/04/10/idiot-s-guide-to-taoist-alchemy/ Also someone who read my posts on this forum - "forced" themselves into full lotus and injured themselves. So you obviously don't want to hurt yourself.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans So I think you wanting to claim Aryan for Proto-Indo-Europeans is blatantly racist.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Indo-Europeans So I think you wanting to claim Aryan for Proto-Indo-Europeans is blatantly racist.

yes yet maybe Hawking has not read E.O. Wilson's book "The Social Conquest of Earth." People confuse culture with ecology - so Hawking thinks the last 10,000 years apparently is human biology but modern humans have existed for over 100,000 years. haha. Oh well. I mean people can be geniuses in their own field but interdisciplinary analysis is not favored in our culture. Yeah and reading takes times - it takes a big investment. Even E.O. Wilson is good but does not know enough about modern culture. My undergrad was in sustainable development - a brand new "option" in International Relations. So I took a third biology, a third economics and a third political science to all be integrated. What did I discover? Those three disciplines all lied about each other to prop up their own propaganda. But who could I turn to about my discovery? No one. haha. You know that Stephen Hawking shared his office in "mathematical physics" with the great Peter Wadhams? But no one has heard of Peter Wadhams! Did you know that Peter Wadhams got fired from being the director of Arctic Ice Research at Cambridge!! He is the world's top expert on Arctic Ice - he led 50 expeditions to study the Arctic ice melting - and why did he get fired? Because he said the Arctic will be ice free for the first time in 3 million years - probably in one year or two years at the latest. No one wants to hear that!! Because if it is true - it also means a 50 gigaton burst of methane is going to let loose. So Wadhams is at a college in Ireland now. He got demoted for telling the truth. haha.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=4&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwinkKbTtOzUAhXmgVQKHTjLCGEQFggvMAM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.quest-journal.net%2FPresocratics_summary.pdf&usg=AFQjCNEaBSFaJNk8vAb1k5a71082LbYSdQ pdf link - Before the Presocratics: Cyclicity, Transformation, and Element Cosmology : the Case of Transcontinental Pre- Or Protohistoric Cosmological Substrates Linking Africa, Eurasia and North America http://www.quest-journal.net/shikanda/topicalities/20122014.htm

https://books.google.com/books?id=Vo7TmTbE-t0C&pg=PA29&lpg=PA29&dq=andronovo+shang&source=bl&ots=jVcWlhlBCi&sig=gx1SBfF--nwLkJDKHsB8keEy9xU&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjoyNjGnOzUAhUqxVQKHdPxCBIQ6AEIQjAH#v=onepage&q=andronovo shang&f=false Ancient China and Its Enemies: The Rise of Nomadic Power in East Asian History By Nicola Di Cosmo So the chariots from the near east - and in central asia were first used for prestige - for aristocratic burials - and this was the case for the Shang as well.

https://books.google.com/books?id=iyvBvYoIZmsC&pg=PA273&lpg=PA273&dq=liangzhu+to+Shang&source=bl&ots=LSKreo-WZT&sig=8o7sjnT0fUNNifLzxQ2iwkxtxs4&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiwisCtoezUAhXJr1QKHS07Cj4Q6AEIRzAF#v=onepage&q=liangzhu to Shang&f=false The Sinister Way: The Divine and the Demonic in Chinese Religious Culture By Richard von Glahn

https://books.google.com/books?id=pA1-3KfkpuwC&pg=PA238&lpg=PA238&dq=andronovo+shang&source=bl&ots=hTC4hYJFa_&sig=dwmDMcTIcmbjKqFRtr4XhMFGCm8&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjoyNjGnOzUAhUqxVQKHdPxCBIQ6AEISDAJ#v=onepage&q=andronovo shang&f=false The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia By Philip L. Kohl