Recommended Posts

Hmm this could make an interesting thread because can anything ever truly be said to be accidental?

 

In the process of 'getting straight' haven't we all had rather odd experiences which some might suggest are pure chance yet others say have more to do with Jung's idea of synchronicity?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm this could make an interesting thread because can anything ever truly be said to be accidental?

 

In the process of 'getting straight' haven't we all had rather odd experiences which some might suggest are pure chance yet others say have more to do with Jung's idea of synchronicity?

 

 

I say we go for it. Maybe it could answer our questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm this could make an interesting thread because can anything ever truly be said to be accidental?

 

In the process of 'getting straight' haven't we all had rather odd experiences which some might suggest are pure chance yet others say have more to do with Jung's idea of synchronicity?

True words..... let's see how this profound thread about nothing evolves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the ultimate meaning of this.... "postless post"?

 

 

:D

 

Is it Lin's quiet wisdom?

... to let other's do the talking ?

 

A chance to play ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Edited form my foolishness

Edited by shontonga

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So is this thread a car crash of events or a flow?

 

There's the question.

 

I'd chip in and suggest how this rings true with beloved 2nd Patriarch of Chan Hui Neng stated:

Ahh, the true awakening of the actual muteness of truth in spontaneous action

 

Can there really be such a profound teacher as accidents?

 

h

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When nothingness is viewed,

there is form.

It is thus the mind acting upon mind.

 

Without distinguishing that which is seeing,

there is still seeing.

Where does the see-er reside?

 

Behind the eyes, within the eyes,

this organ of sight is just the organ of sight.

A direction marked, defiled is the mind.

 

Seeing is just seeing.

Without relying on the organ of seeing,

there is thus, pervasive sight.

Edited by 林愛偉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Obama for president !

 

 

Was that.. Ron Paul you meant? :P

Edited by 林愛偉

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

wow this is wonderful, where else could a thread like this be well appreciated? (and by a thread like this I mean a "postless post" type thread) , everything about this forum makes me happy (except con-people).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites